Outcomes of a mandatory non-medical switch of infliximab to a biosimilar for inflammatory bowel disease in British Columbia, Canada

T. T. Hoang, J. Reid, C. Galorport, Brian Bressler, Y. Leung, G. Rosenfeld
{"title":"Outcomes of a mandatory non-medical switch of infliximab to a biosimilar for inflammatory bowel disease in British Columbia, Canada","authors":"T. T. Hoang, J. Reid, C. Galorport, Brian Bressler, Y. Leung, G. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Despite infliximab biosimilars becoming widely used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, real-world non-medical switching is sparse. A biosimilar non-medical switch was launched in British Columbia in 2019, the first Canadian province to do so, from Remicade to an approved biosimilar (CT-P13 or SB2).\n \n \n \n This study aims to obtain real-world evidence evaluating the clinical outcomes of non-medical switching from Remicade to the infliximab biosimilars.\n \n \n \n This is a retrospective observational study of stable IBD patients from the IBD Centre of BC who underwent the non-medical infliximab switch. The primary outcome is treatment continuation at 12 ± 2 months post-switch. Secondary outcomes include frequency of loss of response, adverse events, and immunogenicity within the first 12 months post-switch. A control group of patients maintained on the originator served as a comparison.\n \n \n \n Patients in the biosimilar switch group (n = 264) and originator group (n = 99), show similar demographics and disease characteristics. There was no difference in infliximab continuation between the biosimilar group (94.9%) and the originator group (90.1%) (P = 0.18). Reasons for discontinuation of infliximab included loss of response (4.04% vs 4.91%), immunogenicity (1.01% vs 0.75%), or adverse effect (1.01% vs 2.3%) in the infliximab originator vs biosimilar switch group, respectively. Similarly, no differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients switched to CT-P13 or SB2.\n \n \n \n Non-medical biosimilar switch of infliximab demonstrates similar clinical outcomes compared to originator molecule continuation for therapy of IBD. These data support the safety and efficacy of non-medical infliximab switching in IBD patients.\n","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":" 61","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite infliximab biosimilars becoming widely used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, real-world non-medical switching is sparse. A biosimilar non-medical switch was launched in British Columbia in 2019, the first Canadian province to do so, from Remicade to an approved biosimilar (CT-P13 or SB2). This study aims to obtain real-world evidence evaluating the clinical outcomes of non-medical switching from Remicade to the infliximab biosimilars. This is a retrospective observational study of stable IBD patients from the IBD Centre of BC who underwent the non-medical infliximab switch. The primary outcome is treatment continuation at 12 ± 2 months post-switch. Secondary outcomes include frequency of loss of response, adverse events, and immunogenicity within the first 12 months post-switch. A control group of patients maintained on the originator served as a comparison. Patients in the biosimilar switch group (n = 264) and originator group (n = 99), show similar demographics and disease characteristics. There was no difference in infliximab continuation between the biosimilar group (94.9%) and the originator group (90.1%) (P = 0.18). Reasons for discontinuation of infliximab included loss of response (4.04% vs 4.91%), immunogenicity (1.01% vs 0.75%), or adverse effect (1.01% vs 2.3%) in the infliximab originator vs biosimilar switch group, respectively. Similarly, no differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients switched to CT-P13 or SB2. Non-medical biosimilar switch of infliximab demonstrates similar clinical outcomes compared to originator molecule continuation for therapy of IBD. These data support the safety and efficacy of non-medical infliximab switching in IBD patients.
加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省在炎症性肠病治疗中强制将英夫利西单抗转为生物仿制药的结果
尽管英夫利西单抗生物仿制药在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中得到了广泛应用,但现实世界中的非医疗转换却很少。不列颠哥伦比亚省于2019年启动了生物类似物非医疗转换,从Remicade转换为已获批准的生物类似物(CT-P13或SB2),这是加拿大第一个这样做的省份。 本研究旨在获得真实世界的证据,评估从 Remicade 非医疗转换到英夫利西单抗生物仿制药的临床效果。 这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象是不列颠哥伦比亚省 IBD 中心接受非药物英夫利西单抗转换治疗的稳定型 IBD 患者。主要结果是转换后 12±2 个月的持续治疗情况。次要结果包括转换后前 12 个月内的应答丧失频率、不良事件和免疫原性。由继续使用原研药的患者组成的对照组作为对比。 生物仿制药转换组(264 人)和原研药组(99 人)的患者显示出相似的人口统计学特征和疾病特征。生物仿制药组(94.9%)和原研药组(90.1%)在继续使用英夫利西单抗方面没有差异(P = 0.18)。英夫利西单抗原研药组和生物类似药转换组的停药原因分别包括反应消失(4.04% vs 4.91%)、免疫原性(1.01% vs 0.75%)或不良反应(1.01% vs 2.3%)。同样,转用 CT-P13 或 SB2 的患者在安全性或疗效方面也未发现差异。 与继续使用原研分子治疗 IBD 相比,英夫利西单抗的非医用生物仿制药转换具有相似的临床疗效。这些数据支持对IBD患者进行非医用英夫利西单抗转换治疗的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信