Climate change science is evolving toward adaptation and mitigation solutions

Danial Khojasteh, Milad Haghani, Abbas Shamsipour, Clara C. Zwack, William Glamore, Robert J. Nicholls, Matthew H. England
{"title":"Climate change science is evolving toward adaptation and mitigation solutions","authors":"Danial Khojasteh, Milad Haghani, Abbas Shamsipour, Clara C. Zwack, William Glamore, Robert J. Nicholls, Matthew H. England","doi":"10.1002/wcc.884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synthesizing the extensive and ever-growing climate change literature is becoming increasingly challenging using conventional review processes, yet is crucial to understand key trends, including knowledge and policy related gaps, managing widespread impacts, and prioritizing future efforts. Here, we employ a systematic approach to interrogate ~130,000 international peer-reviewed climate change articles published between 1990 and 2021. We examine the time–space evolution of research topics and international collaborations, providing insights into broad scale climate change research themes, how they are developed and/or are interconnected. Our analyses indicate that significant thematic adjustments have occurred over the past three decades. Whilst all major areas of climate research have grown in output metrics, there has been a relative shift from understanding the physical science basis toward evaluating climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. There has also been a significant internationalization of climate research with the ratio of international over domestic research increasing from 0.05 in 1990 to nearly 0.60 in 2021. These findings reveal a growing need for collective and coupled adaptation-mitigation actions to address climate change. The repeatable method and overall results presented herein can help to complement existing large-scale literature assessments, such as future IPCC reports.","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synthesizing the extensive and ever-growing climate change literature is becoming increasingly challenging using conventional review processes, yet is crucial to understand key trends, including knowledge and policy related gaps, managing widespread impacts, and prioritizing future efforts. Here, we employ a systematic approach to interrogate ~130,000 international peer-reviewed climate change articles published between 1990 and 2021. We examine the time–space evolution of research topics and international collaborations, providing insights into broad scale climate change research themes, how they are developed and/or are interconnected. Our analyses indicate that significant thematic adjustments have occurred over the past three decades. Whilst all major areas of climate research have grown in output metrics, there has been a relative shift from understanding the physical science basis toward evaluating climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. There has also been a significant internationalization of climate research with the ratio of international over domestic research increasing from 0.05 in 1990 to nearly 0.60 in 2021. These findings reveal a growing need for collective and coupled adaptation-mitigation actions to address climate change. The repeatable method and overall results presented herein can help to complement existing large-scale literature assessments, such as future IPCC reports.

Abstract Image

气候变化科学正朝着适应和减缓解决方案的方向发展
综合广泛且不断增长的气候变化文献越来越具有挑战性,使用传统的审查程序,但对于了解关键趋势,包括与知识和政策相关的差距、管理广泛的影响以及确定未来工作的优先次序至关重要。在此,我们采用了一种系统方法,对 1990 年至 2021 年间发表的约 13 万篇国际同行评审气候变化文章进行了分析。我们研究了研究课题和国际合作的时空演变,深入了解了广泛的气候变化研究课题,以及它们是如何发展和/或相互联系的。我们的分析表明,在过去三十年中,主题发生了重大调整。虽然所有主要气候研究领域的产出指标都有所增长,但相对而言,研究重点已从了解物理科学基础转向评估气候变化的影响、适应和减缓。气候研究也出现了显著的国际化趋势,国际研究与国内研究的比例从 1990 年的 0.05 上升到 2021 年的近 0.60。这些研究结果表明,越来越需要采取集体的、适应与减缓相结合的行动来应对气候变化。本文介绍的可重复方法和总体结果有助于补充现有的大规模文献评估,如未来的 IPCC 报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信