Travel behaviour and the 15-min City: Access intensity, sufficiency, and non-work car use in Toronto

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Anton Yu , Christopher D. Higgins
{"title":"Travel behaviour and the 15-min City: Access intensity, sufficiency, and non-work car use in Toronto","authors":"Anton Yu ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Higgins","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the key travel behavioural assumptions in the 15-min City concept is that if daily necessities are nearby, residents would be encouraged to use slower but more sustainable modes, such as walking, cycling and public transit to reach these destinations, thereby reducing car dependence. This research explores non-work car use associated with the 15-min City concept in the City of Toronto, Canada. We first calculate transportation accessibility, or what we refer to as access intensity, to five categories of daily necessities (food, commercial, health, recreation, and education establishments) using walking, cycling, public transit, and driving. Next, these results are analyzed using a set of minimum access criteria to particular amenities within the different destination types to determine a set of binary access or sufficiency scores. Spatial patterns of accessibilities by mode show expected pockets of high and low access. However, further analysis of non-work trip rates using travel survey data suggests that increases in 15-min accessibilities by walking, cycling, and transit are associated with decreases in the use of driving for 15-min trips. In particular, driving rates decrease as sufficient walking, cycling, and transit access improves with the largest decrease associated with sufficient walking access to all five categories of necessities. This work offers important implications for sustainable transportation and land use planning as it appears that residents do use alternative and more sustainable modes when they are associated with sufficient accessibility to all categories of destinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000498/pdfft?md5=267cfdb024262fc84eb0a336b60f3bc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X24000498-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key travel behavioural assumptions in the 15-min City concept is that if daily necessities are nearby, residents would be encouraged to use slower but more sustainable modes, such as walking, cycling and public transit to reach these destinations, thereby reducing car dependence. This research explores non-work car use associated with the 15-min City concept in the City of Toronto, Canada. We first calculate transportation accessibility, or what we refer to as access intensity, to five categories of daily necessities (food, commercial, health, recreation, and education establishments) using walking, cycling, public transit, and driving. Next, these results are analyzed using a set of minimum access criteria to particular amenities within the different destination types to determine a set of binary access or sufficiency scores. Spatial patterns of accessibilities by mode show expected pockets of high and low access. However, further analysis of non-work trip rates using travel survey data suggests that increases in 15-min accessibilities by walking, cycling, and transit are associated with decreases in the use of driving for 15-min trips. In particular, driving rates decrease as sufficient walking, cycling, and transit access improves with the largest decrease associated with sufficient walking access to all five categories of necessities. This work offers important implications for sustainable transportation and land use planning as it appears that residents do use alternative and more sustainable modes when they are associated with sufficient accessibility to all categories of destinations.

出行行为与 15 分钟城市:多伦多的交通强度、充足性和非工作用车情况
15 分钟城市概念中的一个关键出行行为假设是,如果附近有日常必需品,居民将被鼓励使用较慢但更可持续的方式,如步行、骑自行车和乘坐公共交通到达这些目的地,从而减少对汽车的依赖。本研究探讨了加拿大多伦多市与 "15 分钟城市 "概念相关的非工作日汽车使用情况。我们首先计算了使用步行、骑自行车、公共交通和驾车前往五类日常必需品(食品、商业、保健、娱乐和教育机构)的交通可达性,即我们所说的可达强度。接下来,我们将使用一套不同目的地类型中特定便利设施的最低访问标准对这些结果进行分析,以确定一套二元访问或充足性评分。按交通方式划分的可达性空间模式显示出预期的高可达性和低可达性区域。然而,利用出行调查数据对非工作出行率进行的进一步分析表明,步行、骑自行车和乘公交车 15 分钟可达性的提高与 15 分钟出行中驾车出行率的降低有关。特别是,随着步行、骑自行车和乘坐公交车的交通便利程度的提高,驾车出行率也随之降低,其中步行交通便利程度与所有五类必需品的交通便利程度相关的降幅最大。这项研究为可持续交通和土地利用规划提供了重要的启示,因为当居民使用可替代的、更可持续的交通方式到达所有类别的目的地时,他们确实会使用这些交通方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信