Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations.

Yong-Hwan Cho, Jaehyung Choi, Chae-Wook Huh, Chang Hyeun Kim, Chul Hoon Chang, Soon Chan Kwon, Young Woo Kim, Seung Hun Sheen, Sukh Que Park, Jun Kyeung Ko, Sung-Kon Ha, Hae Woong Jeong, Hyen Seung Kang
{"title":"Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations.","authors":"Yong-Hwan Cho, Jaehyung Choi, Chae-Wook Huh, Chang Hyeun Kim, Chul Hoon Chang, Soon Chan Kwon, Young Woo Kim, Seung Hun Sheen, Sukh Que Park, Jun Kyeung Ko, Sung-Kon Ha, Hae Woong Jeong, Hyen Seung Kang","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endovascular coil embolization is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, its long-term durability remains of concern, with a considerable proportion of cases requiring aneurysm reopening and retreatment. Therefore, establishing optimal follow-up imaging protocols is necessary to ensure a durable occlusion. This study aimed to develop guidelines for follow-up imaging strategies after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A committee comprising members of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society and other relevant societies was formed. A literature review and analyses of the major published guidelines were conducted to gather evidence. A panel of 40 experts convened to achieve a consensus on the recommendations using the modified Delphi method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel members reached the following consensus: 1. Schedule the initial follow-up imaging within 3-6 months of treatment. 2. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA, are alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during the first follow-up. 3. Schedule mid-term follow-up imaging at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after the initial treatment. 4. If noninvasive imaging reveals unstable changes in the treated aneurysms, DSA should be considered. 5. Consider late-term follow-up imaging every 3-5 years for lifelong monitoring of patients with unstable changes or at high risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The guidelines aim to provide physicians with the information to make informed decisions and provide patients with high-quality care. However, owing to a lack of specific recommendations and scientific data, these guidelines are based on expert consensus and should be considered in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10995472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular coil embolization is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, its long-term durability remains of concern, with a considerable proportion of cases requiring aneurysm reopening and retreatment. Therefore, establishing optimal follow-up imaging protocols is necessary to ensure a durable occlusion. This study aimed to develop guidelines for follow-up imaging strategies after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Methods: A committee comprising members of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society and other relevant societies was formed. A literature review and analyses of the major published guidelines were conducted to gather evidence. A panel of 40 experts convened to achieve a consensus on the recommendations using the modified Delphi method.

Results: The panel members reached the following consensus: 1. Schedule the initial follow-up imaging within 3-6 months of treatment. 2. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA, are alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during the first follow-up. 3. Schedule mid-term follow-up imaging at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after the initial treatment. 4. If noninvasive imaging reveals unstable changes in the treated aneurysms, DSA should be considered. 5. Consider late-term follow-up imaging every 3-5 years for lifelong monitoring of patients with unstable changes or at high risk of recurrence.

Conclusions: The guidelines aim to provide physicians with the information to make informed decisions and provide patients with high-quality care. However, owing to a lack of specific recommendations and scientific data, these guidelines are based on expert consensus and should be considered in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and circumstances.

颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗后的影像随访策略:文献综述和指南建议。
目的:血管内线圈栓塞术是治疗颅内动脉瘤的主要方法。然而,其长期耐久性仍然令人担忧,相当一部分病例需要动脉瘤再开刀和再治疗。因此,有必要制定最佳的随访成像方案,以确保闭塞的持久性。本研究旨在制定颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗后随访成像策略指南:方法:成立了一个由韩国神经血管内学会和其他相关学会成员组成的委员会。为收集证据,对已出版的主要指南进行了文献综述和分析。召集了一个由 40 位专家组成的小组,采用改良德尔菲法就建议达成共识:小组成员达成了以下共识:1.在治疗后 3-6 个月内安排首次随访成像。2.2. 在首次随访期间,无创成像模式,如三维飞行时间磁共振血管造影(MRA)或造影剂增强磁共振血管造影(MRA),可替代数字减影血管造影(DSA)。3.在首次治疗后的 1、2、4 和 6 年安排中期随访成像。4.4. 如果无创成像显示治疗后的动脉瘤出现不稳定变化,则应考虑进行 DSA。5.5. 考虑每 3-5 年进行一次晚期随访成像,对有不稳定变化或有高复发风险的患者进行终身监测:该指南旨在为医生提供信息,以便做出明智的决定,并为患者提供高质量的治疗。然而,由于缺乏具体建议和科学数据,这些指南是基于专家共识制定的,应结合患者的个体特征和具体情况加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信