Intraoperative lateral wall breach simulation in the cadaveric spine and the impact of thread designs of screws on pullout strength in the osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae: A biomechanical study in human cadavers.

Ozcan Kaya, Okan Ozkunt, Mustafa Sungur, Mehmet Semih Cakir, Murat Baydogan, Kerim Sariyilmaz
{"title":"Intraoperative lateral wall breach simulation in the cadaveric spine and the impact of thread designs of screws on pullout strength in the osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae: A biomechanical study in human cadavers.","authors":"Ozcan Kaya, Okan Ozkunt, Mustafa Sungur, Mehmet Semih Cakir, Murat Baydogan, Kerim Sariyilmaz","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.22067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed (1) to simulate pedicle screw pullout after intraoperative external wall perforation and (2) to assess restoration strength with different thread designs in the pedicle screw instrumentation for osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebra bodies were prepared and divided into 4 groups: group 1, 5.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial single thread pedicle screws (PASTS); group 2, after wall injury 5.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS; group 3, 6.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS after wall injury; and group 4: 6.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial mixed-threaded screws after wall injury. While group 1 was the control group, groups 2, 3, and 4 were used as study groups after the lateral wall breach. All prepared screw units were placed on a universal pullout measurement testing device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean bone mineral density for 20 thoracic vertebrae was 0.57 ± 0.12 g/cm2 (range 0.53-0.6 g/cm2 ). The mean pullout strength was 474.90 Newtons (N) for group 1, 412.85 N for group 2, 475.4 N for group 3, and 630.74N for group 4. The lateral wall breach caused a 14.1 % decrease in average pullout strength compared with the initial screw pullout. Mixed (double)-threaded screws increased pullout strength compared to 6.5 mm screws (P=.036) Conclusion: Using a 1 mm thicker polyaxial pedicle screw or mixed (double)-threaded pedicle screw seems to increase pullout strength; however, this was statistically significant only for group 4. In the thoracic spine, the redirection possibility of the pedicle screw is limited, and augmentation with cement will not be appropriate due to the risk of wall injury-related leakage. Therefore, care should be taken to avoid violating the lateral cortex by using appropriate pedicle entry points and trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"58 1","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.22067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed (1) to simulate pedicle screw pullout after intraoperative external wall perforation and (2) to assess restoration strength with different thread designs in the pedicle screw instrumentation for osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.

Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebra bodies were prepared and divided into 4 groups: group 1, 5.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial single thread pedicle screws (PASTS); group 2, after wall injury 5.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS; group 3, 6.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS after wall injury; and group 4: 6.5 mm × 45 mm polyaxial mixed-threaded screws after wall injury. While group 1 was the control group, groups 2, 3, and 4 were used as study groups after the lateral wall breach. All prepared screw units were placed on a universal pullout measurement testing device.

Results: The mean bone mineral density for 20 thoracic vertebrae was 0.57 ± 0.12 g/cm2 (range 0.53-0.6 g/cm2 ). The mean pullout strength was 474.90 Newtons (N) for group 1, 412.85 N for group 2, 475.4 N for group 3, and 630.74N for group 4. The lateral wall breach caused a 14.1 % decrease in average pullout strength compared with the initial screw pullout. Mixed (double)-threaded screws increased pullout strength compared to 6.5 mm screws (P=.036) Conclusion: Using a 1 mm thicker polyaxial pedicle screw or mixed (double)-threaded pedicle screw seems to increase pullout strength; however, this was statistically significant only for group 4. In the thoracic spine, the redirection possibility of the pedicle screw is limited, and augmentation with cement will not be appropriate due to the risk of wall injury-related leakage. Therefore, care should be taken to avoid violating the lateral cortex by using appropriate pedicle entry points and trajectories.

尸体脊柱术中侧壁破损模拟以及螺钉螺纹设计对骨质疏松胸椎拔出强度的影响:人体尸体生物力学研究。
研究目的本研究旨在(1)模拟术中外壁穿孔后椎弓根螺钉的拔出;(2)评估骨质疏松胸椎椎弓根螺钉器械中不同螺纹设计的修复强度:制备 20 个新鲜冷冻的人体胸椎椎体并将其分为 4 组:第 1 组,5.5 mm × 45 mm 多轴单螺纹椎弓根螺钉(PASTS);第 2 组,椎壁损伤后 5.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS;第 3 组,椎壁损伤后 6.5 mm × 45 mm PASTS;第 4 组,椎壁损伤后 6.5 mm × 45 mm 多轴混合螺纹螺钉。第 1 组为对照组,第 2、3 和 4 组为侧壁破损后的研究组。所有准备好的螺钉单元都被放置在通用拉力测量测试装置上:20 个胸椎的平均骨质密度为 0.57 ± 0.12 g/cm2(范围为 0.53-0.6 g/cm2)。第 1 组的平均拔出强度为 474.90 牛顿(N),第 2 组为 412.85 牛顿,第 3 组为 475.4 牛顿,第 4 组为 630.74 牛顿。与初始螺钉拔出相比,侧壁破损导致平均拔出强度下降 14.1%。与 6.5 毫米螺钉相比,混合(双)螺纹螺钉增加了拉拔强度(P=.036) 结论:使用1毫米粗的多轴椎弓根螺钉或混合(双)螺纹椎弓根螺钉似乎能增加拔出强度;但只有第4组的拔出强度具有统计学意义。在胸椎,椎弓根螺钉重新定向的可能性有限,而且由于与壁损伤相关的渗漏风险,不适合使用骨水泥增强。因此,应注意通过使用适当的椎弓根进入点和轨迹来避免侵犯侧皮质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信