Enhancing root coverage and esthetic outcomes in isolated gingival recession using orthodontic intervention and lateral closed tunnel technique: An interdisciplinary prospective case series.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Neelima Katti, Rimsha Kp, Ashish Kumar Barik, Surya Kanta Das, Srivani Peri, Devapratim Mohanty
{"title":"Enhancing root coverage and esthetic outcomes in isolated gingival recession using orthodontic intervention and lateral closed tunnel technique: An interdisciplinary prospective case series.","authors":"Neelima Katti, Rimsha Kp, Ashish Kumar Barik, Surya Kanta Das, Srivani Peri, Devapratim Mohanty","doi":"10.1002/cap.10285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gingival recession (GR) in malposed tooth in association with bone dehiscence and/or fenestration poses a challenge for successful root coverage treatment. Lateral closed tunnel (LCT) technique is particularly useful in isolated GR in mandibular anterior region, where the shallow vestibular depth prevents tension-free coronal mobilization of tissues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with GR associated with tooth malposition were treated using a combined orthodontic-periodontic approach with a torquing auxiliary spring followed by LCT technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two techniques resulted in a combined recession depth reduction from 3.75 ± 1.14 mm to 0.40 ± 0.50 mm at the end of 6-month study period. The orthodontic intervention led to an increase in labial marginal bone levels, as assessed through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), while the LCT achieved closure of residual recession defect. Also, an increase of keratinized tissue width from 0.81 ± 0.88 mm at baseline to 3.30 ± 0.67 mm at 6 months was achieved. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) of 91.40% + 10.25% was seen, with 11 out of 20 sites (55%) showing complete root coverage (CRC).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single tooth orthodontic repositioning followed by LCT technique proved effective in successfully managing isolated recession defects in the mandibular anterior gingival region, which often presents challenging mucogingival conditions. The precise single tooth repositioning resulted in labial marginal bone augmentation, while the LCT surgical approach allowed residual defect closure.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Why are these cases new information? Correction of single tooth malposition is achieved before recession coverage treatment to achieve a favorable environment for graft uptake. The reduction in denuded root surface along with the bone remodeling results in increasing the ratio of vascular to avascular region, thus improving the overall prognosis of the treatment. What are the keys to successful management of these cases? The lateral closed tunnel technique involves creating a mucoperiosteal tunnel to close the recession site. Precision is crucial to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. The recipient site should be wider than the width of recession to improve graft vascularity. What are the primary limitations to success in these cases? Limitations may arise when dealing with complex cases, such as multiple teeth involvement or teeth with significant vertical or horizontal bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gingival recession (GR) in malposed tooth in association with bone dehiscence and/or fenestration poses a challenge for successful root coverage treatment. Lateral closed tunnel (LCT) technique is particularly useful in isolated GR in mandibular anterior region, where the shallow vestibular depth prevents tension-free coronal mobilization of tissues.

Methods: Twenty patients with GR associated with tooth malposition were treated using a combined orthodontic-periodontic approach with a torquing auxiliary spring followed by LCT technique.

Results: The two techniques resulted in a combined recession depth reduction from 3.75 ± 1.14 mm to 0.40 ± 0.50 mm at the end of 6-month study period. The orthodontic intervention led to an increase in labial marginal bone levels, as assessed through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), while the LCT achieved closure of residual recession defect. Also, an increase of keratinized tissue width from 0.81 ± 0.88 mm at baseline to 3.30 ± 0.67 mm at 6 months was achieved. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) of 91.40% + 10.25% was seen, with 11 out of 20 sites (55%) showing complete root coverage (CRC).

Conclusions: Single tooth orthodontic repositioning followed by LCT technique proved effective in successfully managing isolated recession defects in the mandibular anterior gingival region, which often presents challenging mucogingival conditions. The precise single tooth repositioning resulted in labial marginal bone augmentation, while the LCT surgical approach allowed residual defect closure.

Key findings: Why are these cases new information? Correction of single tooth malposition is achieved before recession coverage treatment to achieve a favorable environment for graft uptake. The reduction in denuded root surface along with the bone remodeling results in increasing the ratio of vascular to avascular region, thus improving the overall prognosis of the treatment. What are the keys to successful management of these cases? The lateral closed tunnel technique involves creating a mucoperiosteal tunnel to close the recession site. Precision is crucial to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. The recipient site should be wider than the width of recession to improve graft vascularity. What are the primary limitations to success in these cases? Limitations may arise when dealing with complex cases, such as multiple teeth involvement or teeth with significant vertical or horizontal bone loss.

利用正畸干预和侧向封闭隧道技术提高孤立性牙龈退缩的牙根覆盖率和美学效果:跨学科前瞻性病例系列。
背景:畸形牙牙龈退缩(GR)伴有牙槽骨开裂和/或瘘管,给成功的根覆盖治疗带来了挑战。侧方封闭隧道(LCT)技术尤其适用于下颌前牙区的孤立性牙龈退缩,因为那里的前庭深度较浅,无法无张力地调动冠状组织:方法:对 20 名伴有牙齿错位的 GR 患者采用正畸-牙周治疗联合方法,使用扭转辅助弹簧,然后使用 LCT 技术进行治疗:结果:在为期 6 个月的研究结束时,这两种技术的综合退缩深度从 3.75 ± 1.14 毫米减少到 0.40 ± 0.50 毫米。通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估,正畸干预导致了唇缘骨水平的增加,而 LCT 则实现了残余退缩缺损的闭合。此外,角化组织宽度也从基线时的 0.81 ± 0.88 mm 增加到 6 个月时的 3.30 ± 0.67 mm。平均牙根覆盖率(MRC%)为 91.40% + 10.25%,20 个部位中有 11 个(55%)显示出完全的牙根覆盖(CRC):事实证明,单牙正畸复位后的 LCT 技术能有效地成功治疗下颌前牙龈区域的孤立性退缩缺损,而该区域的粘膜牙龈条件往往具有挑战性。精确的单牙复位实现了唇缘骨增量,而 LCT 手术方法则实现了残余缺损的闭合:为什么这些病例是新信息?在衰退覆盖治疗前对单牙错位进行矫正,为移植物的吸收创造有利环境。变性牙根表面的减少以及骨重塑可增加血管区与无血管区的比例,从而改善治疗的整体预后。成功治疗这些病例的关键是什么?侧方封闭隧道技术包括创建一个粘骨膜隧道来封闭退缩部位。为避免损伤周围组织,精确性至关重要。受术部位的宽度应大于退缩的宽度,以改善移植物的血管。这些病例成功的主要限制因素是什么?在处理复杂病例时,如多颗牙齿受累或牙齿有明显的垂直或水平骨质流失时,可能会出现局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信