An Analysis of Incident Reports Related to Electronic Medication Management: How They Change Over Time.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Madaline Kinlay, Wu Yi Zheng, Rosemary Burke, Ilona Juraskova, Lai Mun Rebecca Ho, Hannah Turton, Jason Trinh, Melissa T Baysari
{"title":"An Analysis of Incident Reports Related to Electronic Medication Management: How They Change Over Time.","authors":"Madaline Kinlay, Wu Yi Zheng, Rosemary Burke, Ilona Juraskova, Lai Mun Rebecca Ho, Hannah Turton, Jason Trinh, Melissa T Baysari","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic medication management (EMM) systems have been shown to introduce new patient safety risks that were not possible, or unlikely to occur, with the use of paper charts. Our aim was to examine the factors that contribute to EMM-related incidents and how these incidents change over time with ongoing EMM use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incidents reported at 3 hospitals between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were extracted using a keyword search and then screened to identify EMM-related reports. Data contained in EMM-related incident reports were then classified as unsafe acts made by users and the latent conditions contributing to each incident.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our sample, 444 incident reports were determined to be EMM related. Commission errors were the most frequent unsafe act reported by users (n = 298), whereas workarounds were reported in only 13 reports. User latent conditions (n = 207) were described in the highest number of incident reports, followed by conditions related to the organization (n = 200) and EMM design (n = 184). Over time, user unfamiliarity with the system remained a key contributor to reported incidents. Although fewer articles to electronic transfer errors were reported over time, incident reports related to the transfer of information between different computerized systems increased as hospitals adopted more clinical information systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Electronic medication management-related incidents continue to occur years after EMM implementation and are driven by design, user, and organizational conditions. Although factors contribute to reported incidents in varying degrees over time, some factors are persistent and highlight the importance of continuously improving the EMM system and its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electronic medication management (EMM) systems have been shown to introduce new patient safety risks that were not possible, or unlikely to occur, with the use of paper charts. Our aim was to examine the factors that contribute to EMM-related incidents and how these incidents change over time with ongoing EMM use.

Methods: Incidents reported at 3 hospitals between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were extracted using a keyword search and then screened to identify EMM-related reports. Data contained in EMM-related incident reports were then classified as unsafe acts made by users and the latent conditions contributing to each incident.

Results: In our sample, 444 incident reports were determined to be EMM related. Commission errors were the most frequent unsafe act reported by users (n = 298), whereas workarounds were reported in only 13 reports. User latent conditions (n = 207) were described in the highest number of incident reports, followed by conditions related to the organization (n = 200) and EMM design (n = 184). Over time, user unfamiliarity with the system remained a key contributor to reported incidents. Although fewer articles to electronic transfer errors were reported over time, incident reports related to the transfer of information between different computerized systems increased as hospitals adopted more clinical information systems.

Conclusions: Electronic medication management-related incidents continue to occur years after EMM implementation and are driven by design, user, and organizational conditions. Although factors contribute to reported incidents in varying degrees over time, some factors are persistent and highlight the importance of continuously improving the EMM system and its use.

分析与电子用药管理相关的事故报告:它们如何随时间而变化。
目的:电子用药管理(EMM)系统已被证明会带来新的患者安全风险,而使用纸质病历则不可能或不太可能出现这种风险。我们的目的是研究导致 EMM 相关事故的因素,以及随着 EMM 的持续使用,这些事故会发生怎样的变化:使用关键字搜索提取2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间3家医院报告的事故,然后进行筛选,以确定与EMM相关的报告。然后将 EMM 相关事故报告中包含的数据分类为用户的不安全行为和导致每起事故的潜在条件:在我们的样本中,有 444 份事故报告被确定为与 EMM 相关。操作失误是用户最常报告的不安全行为(n = 298),而变通方法仅在 13 份报告中出现。事故报告中描述最多的是用户潜在状况(n = 207),其次是与组织相关的状况(n = 200)和电子机器管理设计(n = 184)。随着时间的推移,用户对系统的不熟悉仍然是造成所报告事件的主要原因。尽管随着时间的推移,与电子传输错误有关的文章报告越来越少,但随着医院采用更多的临床信息系统,与不同计算机系统之间信息传输有关的事故报告却越来越多:结论:与电子药物管理相关的事故在电子药物管理实施多年后仍时有发生,其驱动因素包括设计、用户和组织条件。尽管随着时间的推移,导致所报告事件的因素各不相同,但有些因素是长期存在的,这就凸显了不断改进 EMM 系统及其使用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信