Tissue-Based Genomic Testing in Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Analysis of National Trends on the Use of Prolaris, Decipher, ProMark, and Oncotype DX.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eugenio Bologna, Francesco Ditonno, Leslie Claire Licari, Antonio Franco, Celeste Manfredi, Spencer Mossack, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giuseppe Simone, Costantino Leonardo, Giorgio Franco
{"title":"Tissue-Based Genomic Testing in Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Analysis of National Trends on the Use of Prolaris, Decipher, ProMark, and Oncotype DX.","authors":"Eugenio Bologna, Francesco Ditonno, Leslie Claire Licari, Antonio Franco, Celeste Manfredi, Spencer Mossack, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giuseppe Simone, Costantino Leonardo, Giorgio Franco","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14020039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) management is moving towards patient-tailored strategies. Advances in molecular and genetic profiling of tumor tissues, integrated with clinical risk assessments, provide deeper insights into disease aggressiveness. This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the pivotal genomic tests supporting PCa treatment decisions, analyzing-through real-world data-trends in their use and the growth of supporting literature evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using the extensive PearlDiver™ Mariner database, which contains de-identified patient records, in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify patients diagnosed with PCa during the study period-2011 to 2021. We determined the utilization of primary tissue-based genetic tests (Oncocyte DX<sup>®</sup>, Prolaris<sup>®</sup>, Decipher<sup>®</sup>, and ProMark<sup>®</sup>) across all patients diagnosed with PCa. Subsequently, within the overall PCa cohort, patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and received genetic testing postoperatively were identified. The yearly distribution of these tests and the corresponding trends were illustrated with graphs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1,561,203 patients with a PCa diagnosis were recorded. Of these, 20,748 underwent tissue-based genetic testing following diagnosis, representing 1.3% of the total cohort. An increasing trend was observed in the use of all genetic tests. Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant increase over time in the use of individual tests (all <i>p</i>-values < 0.05). Among the patients who underwent RP, 3076 received genetic analysis following surgery, representing 1.27% of this group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis indicates a growing trend in the utilization of tissue-based genomic testing for PCa. Nevertheless, they are utilized in less than 2% of PCa patients, whether at initial diagnosis or after surgical treatment. Although it is anticipated that their use may increase as more scientific evidence becomes available, their role requires further elucidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 2","pages":"508-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) management is moving towards patient-tailored strategies. Advances in molecular and genetic profiling of tumor tissues, integrated with clinical risk assessments, provide deeper insights into disease aggressiveness. This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the pivotal genomic tests supporting PCa treatment decisions, analyzing-through real-world data-trends in their use and the growth of supporting literature evidence.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the extensive PearlDiver™ Mariner database, which contains de-identified patient records, in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify patients diagnosed with PCa during the study period-2011 to 2021. We determined the utilization of primary tissue-based genetic tests (Oncocyte DX®, Prolaris®, Decipher®, and ProMark®) across all patients diagnosed with PCa. Subsequently, within the overall PCa cohort, patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and received genetic testing postoperatively were identified. The yearly distribution of these tests and the corresponding trends were illustrated with graphs.

Results: During the study period, 1,561,203 patients with a PCa diagnosis were recorded. Of these, 20,748 underwent tissue-based genetic testing following diagnosis, representing 1.3% of the total cohort. An increasing trend was observed in the use of all genetic tests. Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant increase over time in the use of individual tests (all p-values < 0.05). Among the patients who underwent RP, 3076 received genetic analysis following surgery, representing 1.27% of this group.

Conclusions: Our analysis indicates a growing trend in the utilization of tissue-based genomic testing for PCa. Nevertheless, they are utilized in less than 2% of PCa patients, whether at initial diagnosis or after surgical treatment. Although it is anticipated that their use may increase as more scientific evidence becomes available, their role requires further elucidation.

基于组织的前列腺癌基因组检测:Prolaris、Decipher、ProMark 和 Oncotype DX 十年全国使用趋势分析。
背景:前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗正朝着为患者量身定制的策略方向发展。肿瘤组织的分子和基因图谱分析与临床风险评估相结合,使人们对疾病的侵袭性有了更深入的了解。本研究旨在全面概述支持 PCa 治疗决策的关键基因组检测,通过真实世界的数据分析这些检测的使用趋势以及支持性文献证据的增长情况:根据《健康保险可携性和责任法案》(HIPAA)的规定,我们利用包含去标识化患者记录的庞大 PearlDiver™ Mariner 数据库进行了回顾性分析。我们采用国际疾病分类 (ICD) 和现行医疗程序术语 (CPT) 代码来识别研究期间(2011 年至 2021 年)确诊为 PCa 的患者。我们确定了所有确诊 PCa 患者使用基于组织的主要基因检测(Oncocyte DX®、Prolaris®、Decipher® 和 ProMark®)的情况。随后,在整个 PCa 患者队列中,确定了接受根治性前列腺切除术 (RP) 并在术后接受基因检测的患者。这些检测的年度分布情况和相应趋势用图表进行了说明:在研究期间,共记录了 1,561,203 名确诊为 PCa 的患者。其中,20748 人在确诊后接受了组织基因检测,占总人数的 1.3%。所有基因检测的使用率均呈上升趋势。线性回归分析表明,随着时间的推移,单项检测的使用率出现了统计学意义上的显著增长(所有 p 值均小于 0.05)。在接受 RP 的患者中,有 3076 人在术后接受了基因分析,占这一群体的 1.27%:我们的分析表明,基于组织的 PCa 基因组检测的应用呈增长趋势。结论:我们的分析表明,基于组织的 PCa 基因组检测的应用呈增长趋势,但无论是在初步诊断时还是在手术治疗后,只有不到 2% 的 PCa 患者接受了基因组检测。尽管随着更多科学证据的出现,预计基因组检测的使用率可能会增加,但其作用仍需进一步阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信