Development of Flood Preparedness Behavior Scale: A Methodological Validity and Reliability Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1017/S1049023X24000189
Marwa Osman, Gülşen Taşdelen Teker, Kerim Hakan Altıntaş
{"title":"Development of Flood Preparedness Behavior Scale: A Methodological Validity and Reliability Study.","authors":"Marwa Osman, Gülşen Taşdelen Teker, Kerim Hakan Altıntaş","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X24000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Floods are the most frequent natural disasters with a significant share of their mortality. Preparedness is capable of decreasing the mortality of floods by at least 50%. This paper aims to present the psychometric properties of a scale developed to evaluate the behavior of preparedness to floods in Sudan and similar settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this methodological scale development study, experts assessed the content validity of the items of the developed scale. Data were collected from key persons of 413 households living in neighborhoods affected by the 2018 floods in Kassala City in Sudan. A pre-tested questionnaire of sociodemographic data and the Flood Preparedness Behavior Scale (FPBS) were distributed to the participants' houses and recollected. Construct validity of the scale was checked using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency of the scale was checked using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Item analyses and tests of significance of the difference in the mean scores of the highest and lowest score groups were carried out to ensure discriminatory power of the scale items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experts agreed on the scale items. Construct validity of the scale was achieved using EFA by removing 34 items and retaining 25 items that were structured in three factors, named as: measures to be done before, during, and after a flood. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct obtained by EFA. The loadings of the items on their factors in both EFA and CFA were all > 0.3 with significant associations and acceptable fit indices obtained from CFA. The three factors were found to be reliable in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficients for all factors were > 0.7) and test-retest reliability coefficient. In item analysis, the corrected total item correlations for all the items were > 0.3, and significant differences in the means of the highest and lowest score groups indicated good item discrimination power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed 25 items scale is an instrument which produces valid and reliable measures of preparedness behavior for floods in Sudan and similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"123-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11035919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Floods are the most frequent natural disasters with a significant share of their mortality. Preparedness is capable of decreasing the mortality of floods by at least 50%. This paper aims to present the psychometric properties of a scale developed to evaluate the behavior of preparedness to floods in Sudan and similar settings.

Methods: In this methodological scale development study, experts assessed the content validity of the items of the developed scale. Data were collected from key persons of 413 households living in neighborhoods affected by the 2018 floods in Kassala City in Sudan. A pre-tested questionnaire of sociodemographic data and the Flood Preparedness Behavior Scale (FPBS) were distributed to the participants' houses and recollected. Construct validity of the scale was checked using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency of the scale was checked using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Item analyses and tests of significance of the difference in the mean scores of the highest and lowest score groups were carried out to ensure discriminatory power of the scale items.

Results: Experts agreed on the scale items. Construct validity of the scale was achieved using EFA by removing 34 items and retaining 25 items that were structured in three factors, named as: measures to be done before, during, and after a flood. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct obtained by EFA. The loadings of the items on their factors in both EFA and CFA were all > 0.3 with significant associations and acceptable fit indices obtained from CFA. The three factors were found to be reliable in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficients for all factors were > 0.7) and test-retest reliability coefficient. In item analysis, the corrected total item correlations for all the items were > 0.3, and significant differences in the means of the highest and lowest score groups indicated good item discrimination power.

Conclusion: The developed 25 items scale is an instrument which produces valid and reliable measures of preparedness behavior for floods in Sudan and similar settings.

洪水防范行为量表的编制:方法有效性和可靠性研究。
背景:洪水是最常见的自然灾害,其造成的死亡人数也占很大比例。有备无患能够将洪水造成的死亡率降低至少 50%。本文旨在介绍一个量表的心理测量特性,该量表是为评估苏丹及类似环境下的洪灾防备行为而开发的:在这项方法量表开发研究中,专家对所开发量表的项目进行了内容效度评估。从居住在苏丹卡萨拉市受 2018 年洪灾影响的居民区的 413 户家庭的关键人物处收集了数据。预先测试的社会人口学数据问卷和洪水防范行为量表(FPBS)被分发到参与者家中并进行回收。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)检验了量表的结构效度。使用 Cronbach's alpha 检验了量表的内部一致性。通过皮尔逊相关系数评估了重测可靠性。对最高分组和最低分组的平均分进行了项目分析和显著性检验,以确保量表项目的鉴别力:结果:专家们对量表项目达成了一致意见。采用 EFA 方法实现了量表的结构效度,删除了 34 个项目,保留了 25 个项目,并将其分为三个因子,分别命名为:洪灾前、洪灾中和洪灾后应采取的措施。确认性因子分析证实了 EFA 得出的结构。在 EFA 和 CFA 中,各项目在其因子上的载荷均大于 0.3,具有显著的关联性,CFA 得出的拟合指数也是可接受的。三个因子的内部一致性(所有因子的 Cronbach's alpha 系数均大于 0.7)和重测信度系数均可靠。在项目分析中,所有项目的校正总项目相关均大于 0.3,最高分组和最低分组的均值差异显著,表明项目区分能力良好:所开发的 25 个项目量表是一种能够有效、可靠地测量苏丹及类似环境下洪灾准备行为的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信