Non-Insulin-Based Indices of Insulin Resistance for Predicting Incident Albuminuria: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

IF 1.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.23.0138
Hea Lim Choi, Juyeon Yang, Hye Sun Lee, Ji-Won Lee
{"title":"Non-Insulin-Based Indices of Insulin Resistance for Predicting Incident Albuminuria: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.","authors":"Hea Lim Choi, Juyeon Yang, Hye Sun Lee, Ji-Won Lee","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.23.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that incident albuminuria is associated with insulin resistance (IR); however, an IR marker that best predicts the prevalence of albuminuria has not yet been established. This study explored the association between IR and incident albuminuria using various IR indices, including the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), and triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, and compared their predictive abilities for the prevalence of albuminuria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,982 Korean adults from the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey were analyzed. The odds of albuminuria were determined using the quartiles of the IR indices. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the area under the ROC curve and predictability. The cutoff values for albuminuria detection were also computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in the quartiles of all three IR indices was associated with incident albuminuria, even after full adjustment for covariates (HOMA-IR: odds ratio [OR], 1.906; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.311-2.772; P=0.006; METS-IR: OR, 2.236; 95% CI, 1.353-3.694; P=0.002; TyG index: OR, 1.757; 95% CI, 1.213-2.544; P=0.003). The area under the ROC curve for incident albuminuria based on the HOMA-IR, METS-IR, and TyG indices was 0.594 (95% CI, 0.568-0.619), 0.633 (95% CI, 0.607-0.659), and 0.631 (95% CI, 0.606-0.656), respectively. The optimal cutoff values for predicting albuminuria were 2.38, 35.38, and 8.72 for the HOMA-IR, METS-IR, and TyG indices, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The METS-IR and TyG indices outperformed HOMA-IR in predicting incident albuminuria.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"324-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11605152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that incident albuminuria is associated with insulin resistance (IR); however, an IR marker that best predicts the prevalence of albuminuria has not yet been established. This study explored the association between IR and incident albuminuria using various IR indices, including the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), metabolic score for IR (METS-IR), and triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, and compared their predictive abilities for the prevalence of albuminuria.

Methods: A total of 4,982 Korean adults from the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey were analyzed. The odds of albuminuria were determined using the quartiles of the IR indices. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate the area under the ROC curve and predictability. The cutoff values for albuminuria detection were also computed.

Results: An increase in the quartiles of all three IR indices was associated with incident albuminuria, even after full adjustment for covariates (HOMA-IR: odds ratio [OR], 1.906; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.311-2.772; P=0.006; METS-IR: OR, 2.236; 95% CI, 1.353-3.694; P=0.002; TyG index: OR, 1.757; 95% CI, 1.213-2.544; P=0.003). The area under the ROC curve for incident albuminuria based on the HOMA-IR, METS-IR, and TyG indices was 0.594 (95% CI, 0.568-0.619), 0.633 (95% CI, 0.607-0.659), and 0.631 (95% CI, 0.606-0.656), respectively. The optimal cutoff values for predicting albuminuria were 2.38, 35.38, and 8.72 for the HOMA-IR, METS-IR, and TyG indices, respectively.

Conclusion: The METS-IR and TyG indices outperformed HOMA-IR in predicting incident albuminuria.

以非胰岛素为基础的胰岛素抵抗指标预测白蛋白尿的发生:一项基于全国人口的研究。
背景:研究表明,白蛋白尿的发生与胰岛素抵抗(IR)有关;然而,能最好地预测白蛋白尿发生率的 IR 标志物尚未确定。本研究使用各种胰岛素抵抗指数(包括胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、胰岛素抵抗的代谢评分(METS-IR)和甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)指数)探讨了胰岛素抵抗与白蛋白尿发病率之间的关系,并比较了它们对白蛋白尿发病率的预测能力:方法:对 2019 年韩国国民健康与营养调查中的 4982 名韩国成年人进行了分析。使用 IR 指数的四分位数确定白蛋白尿的几率。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)计算ROC曲线下面积和预测性。同时还计算了检测白蛋白尿的临界值:结果:所有三个 IR 指数四分位数的增加都与白蛋白尿的发生有关,即使在完全调整协变量后也是如此(HOMA-IR:比值比 [OR],1.906;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.311-2.772;P=0.006;METS-IR:OR,2.236;95% CI,1.353-3.694;P=0.002;TyG 指数:比值比 [OR],1.757;95% CI,1.353-3.694;P=0.002):OR,1.757;95% CI,1.213-2.544;P=0.003)。基于 HOMA-IR、METS-IR 和 TyG 指数的白蛋白尿事件 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.594(95% CI,0.568-0.619)、0.633(95% CI,0.607-0.659)和 0.631(95% CI,0.606-0.656)。HOMA-IR、METS-IR和TyG指数预测白蛋白尿的最佳临界值分别为2.38、35.38和8.72:结论:METS-IR 和 TyG 指数在预测事件性白蛋白尿方面优于 HOMA-IR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信