Social parasitism behavior between two species of edible wasps in China

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Cheng-Ye Wang, Hao-Yu Chen, Bing-Qing Fang, Pan-Li Yang, Zhao He, Long Sun, Jin Gan, Min Zhao, Ying Feng
{"title":"Social parasitism behavior between two species of edible wasps in China","authors":"Cheng-Ye Wang, Hao-Yu Chen, Bing-Qing Fang, Pan-Li Yang, Zhao He, Long Sun, Jin Gan, Min Zhao, Ying Feng","doi":"10.1007/s10164-024-00809-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We reported the social parasitism behavior between <i>Vespula structor</i> and <i>Vl. flaviceps</i> for the first time. These two <i>Vespula</i> species are both popular edible wasps in southwest China. Such a nest with these two mixed <i>Vespula</i> species in their natural state was found in the field, and observations both in situ and in doors were performed. Workers of the two <i>Vespula</i> species have distinct different looking but possess similar antennal sensilla. Mitochondrial DNA analysis proved these two <i>Vespula</i> were indeed two different species, with genetic difference of 14%. The queen observed in the nest belongs to <i>Vl. structor</i> which was supported both from morphology and DNA. The larvae collected during nest dissecting could not be distinguished which species they belong to, but DNA analysis proved that they were all <i>Vl. structor</i> individuals. Combined the behavior observation with the DNA data, we concluded that it was the queen of <i>Vl. structor</i> encroached on the nest of <i>Vl. flaviceps</i>, killed the queen of <i>Vl. flaviceps</i>, enslaved the workers in the nest, laid its own eggs, and gradually established the population of <i>Vl. structor</i>. Phylogenetic analysis based on complete mitochondrial genomes showed that they are close, and the <i>Vl. structors</i> was the more ancient species in evolution. In this case of wasp parasitism, the relatively ancient species <i>Vl. structors</i> parasitized the younger species <i>Vl. flaviceps</i>, suggesting that the social parasites (<i>Vl. structor</i>) were not evolved from their host (<i>Vl. flaviceps</i>), which rejected the Emery’s rule in its strict sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":54837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-024-00809-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reported the social parasitism behavior between Vespula structor and Vl. flaviceps for the first time. These two Vespula species are both popular edible wasps in southwest China. Such a nest with these two mixed Vespula species in their natural state was found in the field, and observations both in situ and in doors were performed. Workers of the two Vespula species have distinct different looking but possess similar antennal sensilla. Mitochondrial DNA analysis proved these two Vespula were indeed two different species, with genetic difference of 14%. The queen observed in the nest belongs to Vl. structor which was supported both from morphology and DNA. The larvae collected during nest dissecting could not be distinguished which species they belong to, but DNA analysis proved that they were all Vl. structor individuals. Combined the behavior observation with the DNA data, we concluded that it was the queen of Vl. structor encroached on the nest of Vl. flaviceps, killed the queen of Vl. flaviceps, enslaved the workers in the nest, laid its own eggs, and gradually established the population of Vl. structor. Phylogenetic analysis based on complete mitochondrial genomes showed that they are close, and the Vl. structors was the more ancient species in evolution. In this case of wasp parasitism, the relatively ancient species Vl. structors parasitized the younger species Vl. flaviceps, suggesting that the social parasites (Vl. structor) were not evolved from their host (Vl. flaviceps), which rejected the Emery’s rule in its strict sense.

Abstract Image

中国两种食蜂的社会寄生行为
我们首次报道了结构蜂和黄蜂之间的社会寄生行为。这两种黄蜂都是中国西南地区常见的食用蜂。我们在野外发现了这两个混合蜂种在自然状态下的巢穴,并进行了现场和室内观察。这两种黄蜂的工蜂具有明显不同的外观,但具有相似的触角感觉器。线粒体 DNA 分析证明这两种 Vespula 确实是两个不同的物种,基因差异为 14%。在巢中观察到的蚁后属于Vl.解剖巢穴时采集到的幼虫无法区分属于哪个物种,但DNA分析证明它们都是Vl.结合行为观察和DNA数据,我们得出结论:是Vl.structor的蚁后侵占了Vl.flaviceps的巢穴,杀死了Vl.flaviceps的蚁后,奴役了巢穴中的工蜂,产下了自己的卵,并逐渐建立了Vl.structor的种群。基于完整线粒体基因组的系统进化分析表明,它们之间的关系很接近,结构体蜂是进化过程中更古老的物种。在这一黄蜂寄生案例中,相对古老的物种Vl.structors寄生于较年轻的物种Vl.flaviceps,这表明社会寄生虫(Vl.structor)并非从其宿主(Vl.flaviceps)进化而来,这否定了严格意义上的埃默里法则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ethology
Journal of Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethology features reviews and original papers relating to all aspects of animal behavior, including traditional ethology. Papers on field, laboratory, or theoretical studies are welcomed. In contrast to many other ethological journals that prefer studies testing explicit hypotheses, the Journal of Ethology is interested both in observational studies and in experimental studies. However, the authors of observational studies are always requested to provide background information about behaviors in their study and an appropriate context to establish the scientific importance of their observation, which in turn produces fascinating hypotheses to explain the behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信