Mapping social protection coverage for platform workers: A comparative analysis of Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Eleni De Becker, Hyojin Seo, Valeria Pulignano, Paul Schoukens
{"title":"Mapping social protection coverage for platform workers: A comparative analysis of Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands","authors":"Eleni De Becker, Hyojin Seo, Valeria Pulignano, Paul Schoukens","doi":"10.1177/13882627241236489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to examine if and how the reclassification of platform workers from self-employment status to employment status can provide them with adequate social security protection. Little is known about how this transition would guarantee platform workers adequate social protection within the social protection scheme for employees. National social security schemes, in particular income replacement benefit schemes, often (still) depart from the standard employment relationship, leading to lower protection for atypical work forms. Platform workers combine several of the characteristics of atypical forms of work, such as low earnings, irregular working patterns and working. Integrating platform workers into employee social security schemes faces additional challenges due to the online nature of their work, algorithmic management, high levels of unpaid labor, and employer identification difficulties. This paper focuses on unemployment protection, as EU Member States struggle to provide adequate protection for workers with irregular work patterns and income fluctuations, in the case of (short term) income replacement benefits. By constructing nine ideal work patterns reflective of diverse nature of platform work and current practices among platform work, we analyse how different types of ‘employed’ platform workers may fare within the legislation of three EU countries (Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands). This approach allows us to assess the applicability of unemployment protection to different working patterns among 'employed' platform workers, considering formal, effective, and adequate access to unemployment schemes as outlined in the Council Recommendation on access to social protection for workers and the self-employed (2019).","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627241236489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine if and how the reclassification of platform workers from self-employment status to employment status can provide them with adequate social security protection. Little is known about how this transition would guarantee platform workers adequate social protection within the social protection scheme for employees. National social security schemes, in particular income replacement benefit schemes, often (still) depart from the standard employment relationship, leading to lower protection for atypical work forms. Platform workers combine several of the characteristics of atypical forms of work, such as low earnings, irregular working patterns and working. Integrating platform workers into employee social security schemes faces additional challenges due to the online nature of their work, algorithmic management, high levels of unpaid labor, and employer identification difficulties. This paper focuses on unemployment protection, as EU Member States struggle to provide adequate protection for workers with irregular work patterns and income fluctuations, in the case of (short term) income replacement benefits. By constructing nine ideal work patterns reflective of diverse nature of platform work and current practices among platform work, we analyse how different types of ‘employed’ platform workers may fare within the legislation of three EU countries (Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands). This approach allows us to assess the applicability of unemployment protection to different working patterns among 'employed' platform workers, considering formal, effective, and adequate access to unemployment schemes as outlined in the Council Recommendation on access to social protection for workers and the self-employed (2019).
绘制平台工人的社会保护覆盖图:比利时、意大利和荷兰的比较分析
本文旨在探讨将平台工人从自雇身份重新分类为就业身份能否以及如何为他们提供充分的社会保障保护。人们对这一转变如何保证平台工人在雇员社会保障计划内获得充分的社会保障知之甚少。国家社会保障计划,特别是收入替代福利计划,往往(仍然)偏离标准雇佣关系,导致对非典型工作形式的保护较低。平台工人兼具非典型工作形式的几个特点,如收入低、工作模式不规则和工作。由于其工作的在线性质、算法管理、高水平的无偿劳动以及雇主识别困难,将平台工人纳入雇员社会保障计划面临更多挑战。本文的重点是失业保障,因为欧盟成员国在(短期)收入替代福利方面,努力为工作模式不固定、收入波动大的工人提供充分的保障。通过构建九种理想的工作模式,反映平台工作的不同性质和平台工作的现行做法,我们分析了不同类型的 "受雇 "平台工人在三个欧盟国家(比利时、意大利和荷兰)的立法中可能会受到的待遇。这种方法使我们能够评估失业保护对 "受雇 "平台工作者不同工作模式的适用性,同时考虑到《关于工人和自营职业者获得社会保护的理事会建议》(2019 年)中概述的正规、有效和充分的失业计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信