How quickly can sodium-ion learn? Assessing scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries

Adrian Yao, Sally M. Benson, William C. Chueh
{"title":"How quickly can sodium-ion learn? Assessing scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries","authors":"Adrian Yao, Sally M. Benson, William C. Chueh","doi":"arxiv-2403.13759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have garnered significant attention as a\npotentially low-cost alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, which have\nexperienced challenges in supply availability and volatility in pricing of key\nminerals. Here we assess their techno-economic competitiveness against\nincumbent lithium-ion batteries using a modeling framework incorporating\ncomponential learning curves constrained by minerals prices and engineering\ndesign floors. We compare projected Na-ion and Li-ion price trends across over\n5,400 scenarios while varying Na-ion technology development roadmaps, supply\nchain scenarios, market penetration, and learning rates. We show that Na-ion\nstruggles to be price advantageous against low-cost lithium-ion variants in the\nnear term and are competitive primarily when the Li-ion supply chain is\ndisrupted. Modeled outcomes suggest maximizing Na-ion energy densities via\ncost-centric development roadmaps to be the most impactful way to improve\ncompetitiveness (over that of market intervention) and highlights the value of\nenhanced supply chain security.","PeriodicalId":501304,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.13759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have garnered significant attention as a potentially low-cost alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, which have experienced challenges in supply availability and volatility in pricing of key minerals. Here we assess their techno-economic competitiveness against incumbent lithium-ion batteries using a modeling framework incorporating componential learning curves constrained by minerals prices and engineering design floors. We compare projected Na-ion and Li-ion price trends across over 5,400 scenarios while varying Na-ion technology development roadmaps, supply chain scenarios, market penetration, and learning rates. We show that Na-ion struggles to be price advantageous against low-cost lithium-ion variants in the near term and are competitive primarily when the Li-ion supply chain is disrupted. Modeled outcomes suggest maximizing Na-ion energy densities via cost-centric development roadmaps to be the most impactful way to improve competitiveness (over that of market intervention) and highlights the value of enhanced supply chain security.
钠离子电池的学习速度有多快?评估与锂离子电池相比的技术经济竞争力方案
钠离子(Na-ion)电池作为锂离子(Li-ion)电池的潜在低成本替代品备受关注。在此,我们使用一个建模框架,结合受矿产品价格和工程设计下限限制的连续学习曲线,评估其与现有锂离子电池的技术经济竞争力。我们比较了超过 5400 种情景下镍离子和锂离子电池的预计价格趋势,同时改变了镍离子电池的技术发展路线图、供应链情景、市场渗透率和学习率。我们的研究表明,与低成本的锂离子变体相比,锰酸锂在短期内难以取得价格优势,主要是在锂离子供应链中断时才具有竞争力。建模结果表明,以成本为中心的发展路线图是提高竞争力的最有效途径(超过市场干预),并强调了加强供应链安全的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信