‘Play’ of Meanings: Avivakṣitavācyadhvani, Vivakṣitavācyadhvani and Différance: Concordance or Conflict?

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Ashima Shrawan
{"title":"‘Play’ of Meanings: Avivakṣitavācyadhvani, Vivakṣitavācyadhvani and Différance: Concordance or Conflict?","authors":"Ashima Shrawan","doi":"10.1007/s10781-024-09559-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> The paper attempts to answer a very obstinate fundamental problem—is literary meaning determinable at all? Would it be determinable if it were constructed by the language of the text? Or is this meaning open-ended, constantly deferred or shifted as a result of the very nature of signification? In this paper, I argue that the levels of <i>dhvani-ṣ Avivakṣitavācya dhvani </i> and<i> Vivakṣitavācya dhvani</i> and their sub-levels are far more comprehensive than the concept of ‘<i>differance</i>’, both based on the play of meanings. Ānandvardhana seems to anticipate Derrida in postulating the infinite suggested meaning over and above the expressed literal meaning in the levels of <i>dhvani</i>, though the admission of any definite literal meaning itself goes against the deconstructive approach of ‘<i>differance</i>’. The paper also deals with the analysing a few literary works with the levels of <i>dhvani</i> and also how meaning of a text is revealed to the <i>sahrdaya</i> (reader).</p>","PeriodicalId":51854,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-024-09559-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper attempts to answer a very obstinate fundamental problem—is literary meaning determinable at all? Would it be determinable if it were constructed by the language of the text? Or is this meaning open-ended, constantly deferred or shifted as a result of the very nature of signification? In this paper, I argue that the levels of dhvani-ṣ Avivakṣitavācya dhvani  and Vivakṣitavācya dhvani and their sub-levels are far more comprehensive than the concept of ‘differance’, both based on the play of meanings. Ānandvardhana seems to anticipate Derrida in postulating the infinite suggested meaning over and above the expressed literal meaning in the levels of dhvani, though the admission of any definite literal meaning itself goes against the deconstructive approach of ‘differance’. The paper also deals with the analysing a few literary works with the levels of dhvani and also how meaning of a text is revealed to the sahrdaya (reader).

意义的'游戏':Avivakṣitavācyadhvani, Vivakṣitavācyadhvani 和 Différance:一致还是冲突?
本文试图回答一个非常顽固的基本问题--文学意义到底能否确定?如果它是由文本语言建构的,那么它是可确定的吗?或者说,这种意义是开放式的,由于符号的本质而不断推迟或改变?在本文中,我认为 "阿维瓦尼"(dhvani-ṣ Avivakṣitavācya dhvani)和 "维瓦克"(Vivakṣitavācya dhvani)这两个层次及其子层次远比 "差异"(differance)概念更为全面,二者都以意义的游戏为基础。尽管承认任何明确的字面意义本身就违背了 "差异 "的解构方法,但阿南达瓦德哈纳似乎预示了德里达的观点,即在 "达瓦尼 "的层次中,在所表达的字面意义之外,还有无限的暗示意义。本文还用 dhvani 层次分析了几部文学作品,以及如何向 sahrdaya(读者)揭示文本的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Philosophy publishes articles on various aspects of Indian thought, classical and modern. Articles range from close analysis of individual philosophical texts to detailed annotated translations of texts. The journal also publishes more speculative discussions of philosophical issues based on a close reading of primary sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信