Differential Post-Fire Vegetation Recovery of Boreal Plains Bogs and Margins

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Kristyn M. Mayner, Paul A. Moore, Sophie L. Wilkinson, Henry J. M. Gage, James Michael Waddington
{"title":"Differential Post-Fire Vegetation Recovery of Boreal Plains Bogs and Margins","authors":"Kristyn M. Mayner, Paul A. Moore, Sophie L. Wilkinson, Henry J. M. Gage, James Michael Waddington","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01794-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peatland margins are a distinct ecotone especially vulnerable to deep smouldering in the Boreal Plains because they can experience greater water table drawdown during dry periods compared to peatland middles. Margin recovery trajectories have potentially important implications for wildfire behaviour as both the rate of vegetation recovery and community composition control fuel load and flammability. We compared peatland margin and middle vegetation trajectories using a chronosequence of time-since-fire in boreal Alberta, Canada. Margins had unique post-fire indicator species, with a higher broadleaf cover and limited <i>Sphagnum</i> moss colonization. Middles and margins became less distinct with greater time-since-fire, where both were dominated by feathermoss as canopy closure increased. High burn severity in margins can expose the seedbank in the underlying mineral soil to favourable conditions, causing rapid accumulation of broadleaf aboveground biomass and limiting <i>Sphagnum</i> establishment. The rapid accumulation of aboveground biomass increases potential fuel load, while exclusion of <i>Sphagnum</i> increases future smouldering potential given the dense peat in the margin ecotone. However, the dominance of deciduous vegetation for several decades post fire would serve to limit wildfire compared to a conifer-dominated system, particularly post leaf-out. Thus, peatland margins could represent a positive feedback to peat carbon loss for early season fires and a negative feedback for post leaf-out fires due to the interplay between fuel load, fire seasonality, and species flammability. Characterization of margins as distinct ecotones with a separate vegetation structure and species composition from peatland middles provides critical insight about wildfire vulnerability and carbon storage in the Boreal Plains.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01794-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peatland margins are a distinct ecotone especially vulnerable to deep smouldering in the Boreal Plains because they can experience greater water table drawdown during dry periods compared to peatland middles. Margin recovery trajectories have potentially important implications for wildfire behaviour as both the rate of vegetation recovery and community composition control fuel load and flammability. We compared peatland margin and middle vegetation trajectories using a chronosequence of time-since-fire in boreal Alberta, Canada. Margins had unique post-fire indicator species, with a higher broadleaf cover and limited Sphagnum moss colonization. Middles and margins became less distinct with greater time-since-fire, where both were dominated by feathermoss as canopy closure increased. High burn severity in margins can expose the seedbank in the underlying mineral soil to favourable conditions, causing rapid accumulation of broadleaf aboveground biomass and limiting Sphagnum establishment. The rapid accumulation of aboveground biomass increases potential fuel load, while exclusion of Sphagnum increases future smouldering potential given the dense peat in the margin ecotone. However, the dominance of deciduous vegetation for several decades post fire would serve to limit wildfire compared to a conifer-dominated system, particularly post leaf-out. Thus, peatland margins could represent a positive feedback to peat carbon loss for early season fires and a negative feedback for post leaf-out fires due to the interplay between fuel load, fire seasonality, and species flammability. Characterization of margins as distinct ecotones with a separate vegetation structure and species composition from peatland middles provides critical insight about wildfire vulnerability and carbon storage in the Boreal Plains.

Abstract Image

北方平原沼泽和边缘地带火灾后植被恢复的差异
泥炭地边缘是一个独特的生态区,在北方平原特别容易受到深层烟熏的影响,因为与泥炭地中部相比,泥炭地边缘在干旱时期的地下水位下降幅度更大。边缘的恢复轨迹对野火行为具有潜在的重要影响,因为植被恢复速度和群落组成都控制着燃料负荷和可燃性。我们利用加拿大阿尔伯塔省北方地区自火灾以来的时间序列,比较了泥炭地边缘和中部的植被恢复轨迹。边缘具有独特的火后指示物种,阔叶植物覆盖率较高,泥炭藓定植有限。随着火后时间的延长,中层和边缘的区别越来越小,随着冠层闭合程度的增加,中层和边缘都以羽毛苔为主。边缘地区的高烧伤强度会使下层矿质土壤中的种子库暴露在有利条件下,导致阔叶植物地上生物量的快速积累,并限制斯氏藓的建立。地上生物量的快速积累增加了潜在的燃料负荷,同时,由于边缘生态区的泥炭较厚,泥炭藓的排除增加了未来烟熏的可能性。不过,与针叶林为主的系统相比,落叶植被在火灾后的几十年中一直占主导地位,这将有助于限制野火,尤其是落叶后的野火。因此,由于燃料负荷、火灾季节性和物种易燃性之间的相互作用,泥炭地边缘可能是泥炭碳损失的正反馈,也是落叶后火灾的负反馈。将泥炭地边缘描述为不同的生态区,其植被结构和物种组成与泥炭地中部不同,这为了解北方平原的野火脆弱性和碳储存提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信