A simulation and experimentation architecture for resilient cooperative multiagent reinforcement learning models operating in contested and dynamic environments

Ishan Honhaga, Claudia Szabo
{"title":"A simulation and experimentation architecture for resilient cooperative multiagent reinforcement learning models operating in contested and dynamic environments","authors":"Ishan Honhaga, Claudia Szabo","doi":"10.1177/00375497241232432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooperative multiagent reinforcement learning approaches are increasingly being used to make decisions in contested and dynamic environments, which tend to be wildly different from the environments used to train them. As such, there is a need for a more in-depth understanding of their resilience and robustness in conditions such as network partitions, node failures, or attacks. In this article, we propose a modeling and simulation framework that explores the resilience of four c-MARL models when faced with different types of attacks, and the impact that training with different perturbations has on the effectiveness of these attacks. We show that c-MARL approaches are highly vulnerable to perturbations of observation, action reward, and communication, showing more than 80% drop in the performance from the baseline. We also show that appropriate training with perturbations can dramatically improve performance in some cases, however, can also result in overfitting, making the models less resilient against other attacks. This is a first step toward a more in-depth understanding of the resilience c-MARL models and the effect that contested environments can have on their behavior and toward resilience of complex systems in general.","PeriodicalId":501452,"journal":{"name":"SIMULATION","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIMULATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241232432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooperative multiagent reinforcement learning approaches are increasingly being used to make decisions in contested and dynamic environments, which tend to be wildly different from the environments used to train them. As such, there is a need for a more in-depth understanding of their resilience and robustness in conditions such as network partitions, node failures, or attacks. In this article, we propose a modeling and simulation framework that explores the resilience of four c-MARL models when faced with different types of attacks, and the impact that training with different perturbations has on the effectiveness of these attacks. We show that c-MARL approaches are highly vulnerable to perturbations of observation, action reward, and communication, showing more than 80% drop in the performance from the baseline. We also show that appropriate training with perturbations can dramatically improve performance in some cases, however, can also result in overfitting, making the models less resilient against other attacks. This is a first step toward a more in-depth understanding of the resilience c-MARL models and the effect that contested environments can have on their behavior and toward resilience of complex systems in general.
在有争议的动态环境中运行的弹性合作多代理强化学习模型的模拟和实验架构
合作式多代理强化学习方法越来越多地被用于在有争议的动态环境中做出决策,而这些环境往往与用于训练它们的环境大相径庭。因此,我们需要更深入地了解它们在网络分区、节点故障或攻击等情况下的弹性和鲁棒性。在本文中,我们提出了一个建模和仿真框架,探讨了四种 c-MARL 模型在面对不同类型攻击时的恢复能力,以及使用不同扰动进行训练对这些攻击的有效性产生的影响。我们的研究表明,c-MARL 方法极易受到观察、行动奖励和通信扰动的影响,其性能比基线下降了 80% 以上。我们还表明,在某些情况下,适当的扰动训练可以显著提高性能,但也会导致过度拟合,从而降低模型抵御其他攻击的能力。这是更深入地了解 c-MARL 模型的恢复能力、竞争环境对其行为的影响以及复杂系统总体恢复能力的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信