Artificial Intelligence in corporate governance: a few inquiries on the (non-)compliance of directors’ duties from a Portuguese law perspective

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Igor Silva de Lima
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in corporate governance: a few inquiries on the (non-)compliance of directors’ duties from a Portuguese law perspective","authors":"Igor Silva de Lima","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that directors’ duties encompass the duty to prepare and analyse information concerning the company’s business and affairs and market conditions and the duty to monitor and oversee the company’s actual and prospective economic and financial outlook. While exercising the so-called business judgment rule, directors shall question themselves as to whether the information reasonably available at the time a decision is to be made provides sufficient grounds to support it. They also must have in due regard the underlying business rationality of the decision concerned. The issue merits particular attention in the context of companies undergoing economic or financial distress in the vicinity of insolvency. Directors usually resort to assistance from internal staff and external advisors as well as to technological tools for performing managerial activities. There are a number of options of technologies that employ artificial intelligence (AI) and that have shown a high degree of certainty in predicting scenarios of economic or financial distress. However, directors are not exempted from potential accountability for actions taken in breach of their duties by simply employing AI technology. If, how, and to which extent the use of AI in corporate governance will affect the compliance of a director’s duties are questions yet to be addressed.","PeriodicalId":42756,"journal":{"name":"Uniform Law Review","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uniform Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely accepted that directors’ duties encompass the duty to prepare and analyse information concerning the company’s business and affairs and market conditions and the duty to monitor and oversee the company’s actual and prospective economic and financial outlook. While exercising the so-called business judgment rule, directors shall question themselves as to whether the information reasonably available at the time a decision is to be made provides sufficient grounds to support it. They also must have in due regard the underlying business rationality of the decision concerned. The issue merits particular attention in the context of companies undergoing economic or financial distress in the vicinity of insolvency. Directors usually resort to assistance from internal staff and external advisors as well as to technological tools for performing managerial activities. There are a number of options of technologies that employ artificial intelligence (AI) and that have shown a high degree of certainty in predicting scenarios of economic or financial distress. However, directors are not exempted from potential accountability for actions taken in breach of their duties by simply employing AI technology. If, how, and to which extent the use of AI in corporate governance will affect the compliance of a director’s duties are questions yet to be addressed.
公司治理中的人工智能:从葡萄牙法律角度对(不)履行董事职责的几点探究
人们普遍认为,董事的职责包括编制和分析与公司业务和事务以及市场状况有关的信息的职责,以及监测和监督公司实际和预期经济和财务前景的职责。在行使所谓的商业判断规则时,董事应质疑自己在做出决定时合理获得的信息是否有足够的理由支持该决定。他们还必须适当考虑有关决定的基本商业合理性。在濒临破产的经济或财务困境中,这一问题尤其值得注意。董事通常会借助内部员工和外部顾问的帮助以及技术工具来开展管理活动。有许多采用人工智能(AI)的技术可供选择,这些技术在预测经济或财务困境方面显示出很高的确定性。然而,董事并不能仅仅因为采用了人工智能技术而免于对违反其职责的行为承担责任。在公司治理中使用人工智能会不会、如何以及在多大程度上影响董事履行职责,这些问题都有待解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信