A Comprehensive Comparative Review of Various Advanced Finite Elements to Alleviate Shear, Membrane and Volumetric Locking

IF 9.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Dhiraj S. Bombarde, Lakshmi Narayan Silla, Sachin S. Gautam, Arup Nandy
{"title":"A Comprehensive Comparative Review of Various Advanced Finite Elements to Alleviate Shear, Membrane and Volumetric Locking","authors":"Dhiraj S. Bombarde,&nbsp;Lakshmi Narayan Silla,&nbsp;Sachin S. Gautam,&nbsp;Arup Nandy","doi":"10.1007/s11831-023-10050-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Finite element analysis (FEA) is an extensively exercised numerical procedure to address numerous problems in several engineering fields. However, the accuracy of conventional FEA solutions is significantly affected in specific circumstances where the problem demands near-incompressibility or incompressibility of domain or analysis of thin structural geometries. Over time, several advanced FE models are developed to improve the quality of solutions in stated situations. However, the extensive comparative aspects of these methods are spared limited attention. In the present paper, a comprehensive review and comparison of the selected FE models have been presented. The detailed implementation procedure, along with the relative efficacy of the methods, has been derived for selective reduced integration (SRI), enhanced assumed strain (EAS), assumed natural strain (ANS), and a specific class of hybrid stress elements alongside the conventional FE formulation. The quality of results is assessed by evaluating the relative error norms in displacement and stress on well-established benchmark numerical examples. Furthermore, the paper investigates the methods for several parameters that include the method’s best-suited environment, robustness, and efficiency. The findings in the paper provide an elaborate understanding of the optimal choice of the method in locking-dominated problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"31 4","pages":"1979 - 2013"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-023-10050-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is an extensively exercised numerical procedure to address numerous problems in several engineering fields. However, the accuracy of conventional FEA solutions is significantly affected in specific circumstances where the problem demands near-incompressibility or incompressibility of domain or analysis of thin structural geometries. Over time, several advanced FE models are developed to improve the quality of solutions in stated situations. However, the extensive comparative aspects of these methods are spared limited attention. In the present paper, a comprehensive review and comparison of the selected FE models have been presented. The detailed implementation procedure, along with the relative efficacy of the methods, has been derived for selective reduced integration (SRI), enhanced assumed strain (EAS), assumed natural strain (ANS), and a specific class of hybrid stress elements alongside the conventional FE formulation. The quality of results is assessed by evaluating the relative error norms in displacement and stress on well-established benchmark numerical examples. Furthermore, the paper investigates the methods for several parameters that include the method’s best-suited environment, robustness, and efficiency. The findings in the paper provide an elaborate understanding of the optimal choice of the method in locking-dominated problems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

缓解剪切、膜和体积锁定的各种先进有限元的综合比较评述
有限元分析(FEA)是一种广泛应用的数值程序,可用于解决多个工程领域的众多问题。然而,在特定情况下,如果问题要求领域接近可压缩或不可压缩,或需要分析薄结构几何形状,传统有限元分析解决方案的准确性就会受到严重影响。随着时间的推移,一些先进的有限元模型被开发出来,以提高上述情况下的求解质量。然而,人们对这些方法的广泛比较关注有限。本文对所选的 FE 模型进行了全面回顾和比较。详细的实施程序以及方法的相对功效,是针对选择性减小积分法(SRI)、增强假定应变法(EAS)、假定自然应变法(ANS)和一类特定的混合应力元素以及传统的 FE 公式得出的。通过评估在成熟的基准数值实例中位移和应力的相对误差规范,对结果的质量进行了评估。此外,论文还对方法的几个参数进行了研究,包括方法的最佳环境、鲁棒性和效率。本文的研究结果为锁定主导问题中方法的最佳选择提供了详尽的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信