A systematic review of indicators and methods used to assess coastal to offshore marine ecosystems in the western Canadian Arctic

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Miranda Bilous, Kevin Wight, Eranga K. Galappaththi, Karen M. Dunmall
{"title":"A systematic review of indicators and methods used to assess coastal to offshore marine ecosystems in the western Canadian Arctic","authors":"Miranda Bilous, Kevin Wight, Eranga K. Galappaththi, Karen M. Dunmall","doi":"10.1007/s00300-024-03237-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integration and coordination among monitoring programs are needed to better assess the impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems. The use of common indicators and methods could facilitate this comprehensive understanding. We completed a systematic review of published marine research in the western Canadian Arctic from 1962 to 2021 to identify the commonalities in methods and indicators present in assessments of coastal and offshore ecosystems. Most abundant in our sample were indicators addressing the environmental context, followed by indicators concerning trophic webs and biological organisms, and finally indicators associated with anthropogenic stressors and threats. Ship-based studies located far offshore were by far the most common and focused on indicators that characterized the physical environment and lower trophic levels. Commonalities in data collection methods suggest possibilities for standardization among programs for some parameters. Differences and data gaps highlighted areas for future coordination and the potential to integrate among indicators, especially as some indicators may span coastal to offshore ecosystems whereas individual monitoring programs may not. The results of this review could be used to identify and gather data into broad-spanning datasets. Overall, this systematic review highlights opportunities to link indicators and methods among coastal to offshore programs and will therefore facilitate connectivity and coordination of ecological research and monitoring in the western Canadian Arctic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20362,"journal":{"name":"Polar Biology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-024-03237-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration and coordination among monitoring programs are needed to better assess the impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems. The use of common indicators and methods could facilitate this comprehensive understanding. We completed a systematic review of published marine research in the western Canadian Arctic from 1962 to 2021 to identify the commonalities in methods and indicators present in assessments of coastal and offshore ecosystems. Most abundant in our sample were indicators addressing the environmental context, followed by indicators concerning trophic webs and biological organisms, and finally indicators associated with anthropogenic stressors and threats. Ship-based studies located far offshore were by far the most common and focused on indicators that characterized the physical environment and lower trophic levels. Commonalities in data collection methods suggest possibilities for standardization among programs for some parameters. Differences and data gaps highlighted areas for future coordination and the potential to integrate among indicators, especially as some indicators may span coastal to offshore ecosystems whereas individual monitoring programs may not. The results of this review could be used to identify and gather data into broad-spanning datasets. Overall, this systematic review highlights opportunities to link indicators and methods among coastal to offshore programs and will therefore facilitate connectivity and coordination of ecological research and monitoring in the western Canadian Arctic.

Abstract Image

对用于评估加拿大北极西部沿海到近海海洋生态系统的指标和方法进行系统审查
为了更好地评估气候变化对北极海洋生态系统的影响,需要对监测计划进行整合和协调。使用通用指标和方法可以促进这种全面理解。我们对 1962 年至 2021 年加拿大西部北极地区发表的海洋研究成果进行了系统回顾,以确定沿海和近海生态系统评估方法和指标的共性。在我们的样本中,涉及环境背景的指标最多,其次是有关营养网和生物有机体的指标,最后是与人为压力和威胁相关的指标。以船舶为基础、位于远海的研究最为常见,其重点是描述物理环境和低营养级的指标。数据收集方法上的共性表明,有可能在某些参数上实现项目间的标准化。这些指标包括:(1)海洋生物资源量、(2)海洋生物资源量、(3)海洋生物资源量、(4)海洋生物资源量、(5)海洋生物资源量、(6)海洋生物资源量、(7)海洋生物资源量。本次审查的结果可用于确定和收集数据,形成跨度较大的数据集。总之,本系统性综述强调了将沿岸到近海项目之间的指标和方法联系起来的机会,因此将促进加拿大西部北极地区生态研究和监测的连通性和协调性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polar Biology
Polar Biology 生物-生态学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
116
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Polar Biology publishes Original Papers, Reviews, and Short Notes and is the focal point for biologists working in polar regions. It is also of interest to scientists working in biology in general, ecology and physiology, as well as in oceanography and climatology related to polar life. Polar Biology presents results of studies in plants, animals, and micro-organisms of marine, limnic and terrestrial habitats in polar and subpolar regions of both hemispheres. Taxonomy/ Biogeography Life History Spatio-temporal Patterns in Abundance and Diversity Ecological Interactions Trophic Ecology Ecophysiology/ Biochemistry of Adaptation Biogeochemical Pathways and Cycles Ecological Models Human Impact/ Climate Change/ Conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信