Addressing the generalization of 3D registration methods with a featureless baseline and an unbiased benchmark

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
David Bojanić, Kristijan Bartol, Josep Forest, Tomislav Petković, Tomislav Pribanić
{"title":"Addressing the generalization of 3D registration methods with a featureless baseline and an unbiased benchmark","authors":"David Bojanić, Kristijan Bartol, Josep Forest, Tomislav Petković, Tomislav Pribanić","doi":"10.1007/s00138-024-01510-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent 3D registration methods are mostly learning-based that either find correspondences in feature space and match them, or directly estimate the registration transformation from the given point cloud features. Therefore, these feature-based methods have difficulties with generalizing onto point clouds that differ substantially from their training data. This issue is not so apparent because of the problematic benchmark definitions that cannot provide any in-depth analysis and contain a bias toward similar data. Therefore, we propose a methodology to create a 3D registration benchmark, given a point cloud dataset, that provides a more informative evaluation of a method w.r.t. other benchmarks. Using this methodology, we create a novel FAUST-partial (FP) benchmark, based on the FAUST dataset, with several difficulty levels. The FP benchmark addresses the limitations of the current benchmarks: lack of data and parameter range variability, and allows to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a 3D registration method w.r.t. a single registration parameter. Using the new FP benchmark, we provide a thorough analysis of the current state-of-the-art methods and observe that the current method still struggle to generalize onto severely different out-of-sample data. Therefore, we propose a simple featureless traditional 3D registration baseline method based on the weighted cross-correlation between two given point clouds. Our method achieves strong results on current benchmarking datasets, outperforming most deep learning methods. Our source code is available on github.com/DavidBoja/exhaustive-grid-search.</p>","PeriodicalId":51116,"journal":{"name":"Machine Vision and Applications","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Vision and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-024-01510-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent 3D registration methods are mostly learning-based that either find correspondences in feature space and match them, or directly estimate the registration transformation from the given point cloud features. Therefore, these feature-based methods have difficulties with generalizing onto point clouds that differ substantially from their training data. This issue is not so apparent because of the problematic benchmark definitions that cannot provide any in-depth analysis and contain a bias toward similar data. Therefore, we propose a methodology to create a 3D registration benchmark, given a point cloud dataset, that provides a more informative evaluation of a method w.r.t. other benchmarks. Using this methodology, we create a novel FAUST-partial (FP) benchmark, based on the FAUST dataset, with several difficulty levels. The FP benchmark addresses the limitations of the current benchmarks: lack of data and parameter range variability, and allows to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a 3D registration method w.r.t. a single registration parameter. Using the new FP benchmark, we provide a thorough analysis of the current state-of-the-art methods and observe that the current method still struggle to generalize onto severely different out-of-sample data. Therefore, we propose a simple featureless traditional 3D registration baseline method based on the weighted cross-correlation between two given point clouds. Our method achieves strong results on current benchmarking datasets, outperforming most deep learning methods. Our source code is available on github.com/DavidBoja/exhaustive-grid-search.

Abstract Image

利用无特征基线和无偏基准解决三维注册方法的通用性问题
最新的三维配准方法大多基于学习,要么在特征空间中找到对应点并进行匹配,要么直接从给定的点云特征中估算配准变换。因此,这些基于特征的方法很难推广到与其训练数据有很大差异的点云上。由于基准定义存在问题,无法提供任何深入分析,且偏向于类似数据,因此这一问题并不明显。因此,我们提出了一种创建三维注册基准的方法,给定一个点云数据集,该数据集可提供一种方法相对于其他基准的更翔实的评估。利用这种方法,我们在 FAUST 数据集的基础上创建了一个具有多个难度级别的新型 FAUST-partial(FP)基准。FP 基准解决了当前基准的局限性:缺乏数据和参数范围的可变性,并允许在单一注册参数方面评估三维注册方法的优缺点。通过使用新的 FP 基准,我们对当前最先进的方法进行了全面分析,发现当前的方法仍难以推广到严重不同的样本外数据上。因此,我们基于两个给定点云之间的加权交叉相关性,提出了一种简单的无特征传统三维注册基线方法。我们的方法在当前的基准数据集上取得了很好的效果,优于大多数深度学习方法。我们的源代码可在 github.com/DavidBoja/exhaustive-grid-search 上获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Machine Vision and Applications
Machine Vision and Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Machine Vision and Applications publishes high-quality technical contributions in machine vision research and development. Specifically, the editors encourage submittals in all applications and engineering aspects of image-related computing. In particular, original contributions dealing with scientific, commercial, industrial, military, and biomedical applications of machine vision, are all within the scope of the journal. Particular emphasis is placed on engineering and technology aspects of image processing and computer vision. The following aspects of machine vision applications are of interest: algorithms, architectures, VLSI implementations, AI techniques and expert systems for machine vision, front-end sensing, multidimensional and multisensor machine vision, real-time techniques, image databases, virtual reality and visualization. Papers must include a significant experimental validation component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信