Sickle cell disease.

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2016-01-22
Martin M Meremikwu, Uduak Okomo
{"title":"Sickle cell disease.","authors":"Martin M Meremikwu, Uduak Okomo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sickle cell disease causes chronic haemolytic anaemia, dactylitis, and painful acute crises. It also increases the risk of stroke, organ damage, bacterial infections, and complications of blood transfusion. In sub-Saharan Africa, up to one third of adults are carriers of the defective sickle cell gene, and 1% to 2% of babies are born with the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of pharmaceutical interventions to prevent sickle cell crisis and other acute complications in people with sickle cell disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to January 2015 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 369 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 136 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 99 studies and the further review of 37 full publications. Of the 37 full articles evaluated, three already included systematic reviews were updated, two systematic reviews, two RCTs, and one subsequent RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged under 5 years, antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged 5 years or older, hydroxyurea, malaria chemoprophylaxis, and pneumococcal vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4725622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sickle cell disease causes chronic haemolytic anaemia, dactylitis, and painful acute crises. It also increases the risk of stroke, organ damage, bacterial infections, and complications of blood transfusion. In sub-Saharan Africa, up to one third of adults are carriers of the defective sickle cell gene, and 1% to 2% of babies are born with the disease.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of pharmaceutical interventions to prevent sickle cell crisis and other acute complications in people with sickle cell disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to January 2015 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 369 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 136 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 99 studies and the further review of 37 full publications. Of the 37 full articles evaluated, three already included systematic reviews were updated, two systematic reviews, two RCTs, and one subsequent RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations.

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged under 5 years, antibiotic prophylaxis in children aged 5 years or older, hydroxyurea, malaria chemoprophylaxis, and pneumococcal vaccines.

镰状细胞病
简介镰状细胞病会导致慢性溶血性贫血、手足口炎和痛苦的急性危象。镰状细胞病还会增加中风、器官损伤、细菌感染和输血并发症的风险。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,多达三分之一的成年人是镰状细胞缺陷基因携带者,1% 到 2% 的婴儿出生时患有这种疾病:我们进行了一项系统性综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:药物干预对镰状细胞病患者预防镰状细胞危象和其他急性并发症的效果如何?我们检索了Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library和其他重要数据库(截至2015年1月,临床证据综述会定期更新;请在我们的网站上查看本综述的最新版本):在本次更新中,搜索电子数据库共检索到 369 项研究。经重复数据删除和会议摘要去除后,筛选出 136 条记录纳入本综述。通过对标题和摘要的评估,排除了 99 项研究,并进一步审查了 37 篇全文。在已评估的 37 篇完整文章中,我们更新了三篇已纳入的系统综述,并在此次更新中增加了两篇系统综述、两篇研究性试验和一篇后续研究性试验。我们对 12 个 PICO 组合进行了 GRADE 评估:在这篇系统综述中,我们根据有关 5 岁以下儿童抗生素预防、5 岁或以上儿童抗生素预防、羟基脲、疟疾化学预防和肺炎球菌疫苗有效性和安全性的信息,对五种干预措施的有效性进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信