Post-operative Pain Control: A Comparison between Bupivacaine and Tramadol Local Wound Infiltration in Children Undergoing Herniotomy and Orchidopexy.

Efosa Aisien, Chukwuemeka Ndubuisi Chibuzom, David Osarumwense Osifo, Iyekeoretin Evbuomwan
{"title":"Post-operative Pain Control: A Comparison between Bupivacaine and Tramadol Local Wound Infiltration in Children Undergoing Herniotomy and Orchidopexy.","authors":"Efosa Aisien, Chukwuemeka Ndubuisi Chibuzom, David Osarumwense Osifo, Iyekeoretin Evbuomwan","doi":"10.4103/ajps.ajps_172_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-operative pain control improves patient's satisfaction and affects the period of admission. Local wound infiltration following hernia surgery using xylocaine or bupivacaine has been a common practice. The use of tramadol for such infiltration is relatively new and has not been studied in our environment. This study compared the efficacy of post-operative pain control between Bupivacaine and Tramadol wound infiltration in children who underwent herniotomy and orchidopexy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a prospective randomised study involving 104 patients. A simple random method was used to allocate the study group into two equal groups (A, n = 52 and B, n = 52) using sealed envelopes with contents labelled A or B. Pre- and post-operative respiratory rate, heart rate, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were all recorded. Time to first and subsequent analgesia was determined using face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients in Group A and 18 patients in Group B received each two doses of supplemental analgesia within the first 24 h, ( P = 0.527). Time to first analgesia was significantly different between the two groups, (6.93 ± 0.80 h and 6.11 ± 1.08 h, P = 0.020). The mean FLACC pain score at the time of first analgesia in hours was 4.93 ± 0.59 and 4.72 ± 0.67 for Group A and B, respectively, P = 0.350. The changes in CRP were not different in the two groups, ( P = 0.665). Four patients in Group A, but none in Group B had an episode each of post-operative vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tramadol showed comparable efficacy with bupivacaine in post-operative pain control by wound infiltration in children who had unilateral herniotomy or orchidopexy. Tramadol, however, achieves a longer duration of action before rescue analgesic is required. Caution is necessary to avoid post-operative vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72123,"journal":{"name":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","volume":" ","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_172_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-operative pain control improves patient's satisfaction and affects the period of admission. Local wound infiltration following hernia surgery using xylocaine or bupivacaine has been a common practice. The use of tramadol for such infiltration is relatively new and has not been studied in our environment. This study compared the efficacy of post-operative pain control between Bupivacaine and Tramadol wound infiltration in children who underwent herniotomy and orchidopexy.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective randomised study involving 104 patients. A simple random method was used to allocate the study group into two equal groups (A, n = 52 and B, n = 52) using sealed envelopes with contents labelled A or B. Pre- and post-operative respiratory rate, heart rate, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were all recorded. Time to first and subsequent analgesia was determined using face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain score.

Results: Fifteen patients in Group A and 18 patients in Group B received each two doses of supplemental analgesia within the first 24 h, ( P = 0.527). Time to first analgesia was significantly different between the two groups, (6.93 ± 0.80 h and 6.11 ± 1.08 h, P = 0.020). The mean FLACC pain score at the time of first analgesia in hours was 4.93 ± 0.59 and 4.72 ± 0.67 for Group A and B, respectively, P = 0.350. The changes in CRP were not different in the two groups, ( P = 0.665). Four patients in Group A, but none in Group B had an episode each of post-operative vomiting.

Conclusion: Tramadol showed comparable efficacy with bupivacaine in post-operative pain control by wound infiltration in children who had unilateral herniotomy or orchidopexy. Tramadol, however, achieves a longer duration of action before rescue analgesic is required. Caution is necessary to avoid post-operative vomiting.

术后疼痛控制:布比卡因与曲马多局部伤口浸润在儿童疝气切除术和睾丸切除术中的应用比较
导言:术后疼痛控制可提高病人的满意度,并影响入院时间。疝气手术后使用木托卡因或布比卡因进行局部伤口浸润是一种常见的做法。使用曲马多进行这种浸润相对较新,在我们的环境中尚未进行过研究。本研究比较了布比卡因和曲马多伤口浸润对接受疝气和睾丸切除术的儿童术后疼痛控制的效果:这是一项前瞻性随机研究,共有 104 名患者参与。采用简单的随机方法将研究组分为两个相等的小组(A 组,52 人;B 组,52 人),使用密封的信封,信封上标有 A 或 B 的内容。使用脸部、腿部、活动、哭泣、可安慰性(FLACC)疼痛评分来确定首次镇痛和后续镇痛的时间:结果:A 组 15 名患者和 B 组 18 名患者在最初 24 小时内分别接受了两次补充镇痛(P = 0.527)。两组患者首次镇痛的时间明显不同(6.93 ± 0.80 小时和 6.11 ± 1.08 小时,P = 0.020)。首次镇痛时的平均 FLACC 疼痛评分(小时)在 A 组和 B 组分别为 4.93 ± 0.59 和 4.72 ± 0.67,P = 0.350。两组的 CRP 变化无差异(P = 0.665)。A 组有四名患者出现术后呕吐,而 B 组没有:在单侧疝气切除术或睾丸切除术的儿童中,曲马多与布比卡因通过伤口浸润控制术后疼痛的效果相当。不过,曲马多在需要使用镇痛抢救药之前的作用时间更长。必须注意避免术后呕吐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信