An exploration of low back pain beliefs held by health care professionals in Northern America.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
B Michael Ray, Leah Washington, Bronwyn Lennox Thompson, Kyle Kelleran
{"title":"An exploration of low back pain beliefs held by health care professionals in Northern America.","authors":"B Michael Ray, Leah Washington, Bronwyn Lennox Thompson, Kyle Kelleran","doi":"10.1002/msc.1877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research demonstrated that people in the United States and Canada (Northern America) hold predominantly biomedical beliefs about Low back pain (LBP); such beliefs were attributed to healthcare professionals (HCP). Further investigation is needed to understand HCP' LBP beliefs, preferred management strategies, and sources of beliefs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited via social media to complete a qualitative cross-sectional online survey. The survey was distributed to assess LBP beliefs in a U.S. and Canadian-based clinician population. Participants answered questions about the cause of LBP, reasons for recurrence or persistence, use of imaging, management strategies, and sources of beliefs. Responses were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty three participants were included, reporting multiple causes for LBP. However, many references were anchored to biological problems. When psychological variables were mentioned, it typically involved patient blaming. Like prior research studies, minimal attention was given to societal and environmental influences. Management strategies often aligned with guideline care except for the recommendation of inappropriate imaging and a reliance on passive interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings align with prior research studies on general population beliefs, demonstrating a preference for biological causes of LBP. Further updates are needed for clinical education, while future studies should seek to assess the translation of clinician beliefs into clinical practice and health system constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research demonstrated that people in the United States and Canada (Northern America) hold predominantly biomedical beliefs about Low back pain (LBP); such beliefs were attributed to healthcare professionals (HCP). Further investigation is needed to understand HCP' LBP beliefs, preferred management strategies, and sources of beliefs.

Methods: Participants were recruited via social media to complete a qualitative cross-sectional online survey. The survey was distributed to assess LBP beliefs in a U.S. and Canadian-based clinician population. Participants answered questions about the cause of LBP, reasons for recurrence or persistence, use of imaging, management strategies, and sources of beliefs. Responses were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.

Results: One hundred and sixty three participants were included, reporting multiple causes for LBP. However, many references were anchored to biological problems. When psychological variables were mentioned, it typically involved patient blaming. Like prior research studies, minimal attention was given to societal and environmental influences. Management strategies often aligned with guideline care except for the recommendation of inappropriate imaging and a reliance on passive interventions.

Conclusions: These findings align with prior research studies on general population beliefs, demonstrating a preference for biological causes of LBP. Further updates are needed for clinical education, while future studies should seek to assess the translation of clinician beliefs into clinical practice and health system constraints.

对美国北部医疗保健专业人员所持腰背痛观念的探讨。
背景:先前的研究表明,美国和加拿大(北美洲)的人们对腰背痛(LBP)主要持有生物医学信念;这种信念归因于医疗保健专业人员(HCP)。要了解医护人员的腰背痛信念、偏好的管理策略以及信念的来源,还需要进一步的调查:方法: 通过社交媒体招募参与者,让他们完成一项横断面定性在线调查。该调查旨在评估美国和加拿大临床医生的枸杞多糖症信念。参与者回答了有关枸杞多糖症的病因、复发或持续存在的原因、影像学的使用、管理策略以及信念来源的问题。我们采用归纳式主题分析法对参与者的回答进行了分析:结果:163 名参与者报告了导致腰痛的多种原因。然而,许多人提到的都是生物学问题。当提到心理变量时,通常涉及患者的自责。与之前的研究一样,对社会和环境影响的关注极少。除了推荐不适当的影像学检查和依赖被动干预外,管理策略通常与指南护理一致:结论:这些研究结果与之前关于普通人群观念的研究结果一致,表明人们更倾向于认为腰椎间盘突出症是由生物学原因引起的。临床教育需要进一步更新,而未来的研究则应寻求评估临床医生的观念转化为临床实践和医疗系统制约因素的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信