Reputation is not enough: Ensuring strong order-fairness in Byzantine consensus

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Jianhong Li , Qi Chen , Jin Li , Zihan Jiang , Guoyu Yang , Teng Huang , Hongyang Yan , Duncan S. Wong
{"title":"Reputation is not enough: Ensuring strong order-fairness in Byzantine consensus","authors":"Jianhong Li ,&nbsp;Qi Chen ,&nbsp;Jin Li ,&nbsp;Zihan Jiang ,&nbsp;Guoyu Yang ,&nbsp;Teng Huang ,&nbsp;Hongyang Yan ,&nbsp;Duncan S. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the development of blockchain technology, Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) is becoming an important research topic. The rPBFT consensus algorithm was introduced to address a range of shortcomings in the PBFT consensus algorithm, including high communication complexity, limited scalability, and a significant decline in performance when the system reaches approximately 100 nodes. Although rPBFT has been widely applied in the FISCO consortium chain, existing methods fail to ensure fairness in the power distribution among consensus member nodes and fine-grained node classification in rPBFT consensus. This work proposes a rPBFT consensus mechanism based on reputation value evaluation and supervision of consensus members. By implementing hierarchical management of nodes based on their reputation values, malicious nodes are eliminated, and supervision of consensus members is realized. The simulation experiment simulates the decision process of a variety of different nodes and consensus member jury with different proportions of 60%, 80% and 100% judges. The results show that the proposed scheme can dynamically update the node reputation value and classify various nodes. On the premise that the jury judges cast no less than 50% of the verdict votes, the malicious nodes in the consensus members can also be eliminated from the group of consensus member nodes. The scheme proposed in this paper effectively improves the fault tolerance of the rPBFT consensus mechanism, maintains the stability of the consortium chain network and ensures the security of the system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103855"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the development of blockchain technology, Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) is becoming an important research topic. The rPBFT consensus algorithm was introduced to address a range of shortcomings in the PBFT consensus algorithm, including high communication complexity, limited scalability, and a significant decline in performance when the system reaches approximately 100 nodes. Although rPBFT has been widely applied in the FISCO consortium chain, existing methods fail to ensure fairness in the power distribution among consensus member nodes and fine-grained node classification in rPBFT consensus. This work proposes a rPBFT consensus mechanism based on reputation value evaluation and supervision of consensus members. By implementing hierarchical management of nodes based on their reputation values, malicious nodes are eliminated, and supervision of consensus members is realized. The simulation experiment simulates the decision process of a variety of different nodes and consensus member jury with different proportions of 60%, 80% and 100% judges. The results show that the proposed scheme can dynamically update the node reputation value and classify various nodes. On the premise that the jury judges cast no less than 50% of the verdict votes, the malicious nodes in the consensus members can also be eliminated from the group of consensus member nodes. The scheme proposed in this paper effectively improves the fault tolerance of the rPBFT consensus mechanism, maintains the stability of the consortium chain network and ensures the security of the system.

光有声誉还不够:确保拜占庭共识中的强秩序公平性
随着区块链技术的发展,拜占庭容错(BFT)正成为一个重要的研究课题。rPBFT共识算法的提出是为了解决PBFT共识算法的一系列缺陷,包括通信复杂度高、可扩展性有限以及当系统达到约100个节点时性能显著下降等。虽然 rPBFT 已广泛应用于 FISCO 联盟链,但现有方法无法确保 rPBFT 共识中共识成员节点间功率分配的公平性和细粒度节点分类。本研究提出了一种基于信誉值评估和共识成员监督的 rPBFT 共识机制。通过对节点实施基于声誉值的分级管理,消除了恶意节点,实现了对共识成员的监督。仿真实验模拟了各种不同节点和共识成员评审团的决策过程,评审团的比例分别为 60%、80% 和 100%。结果表明,所提出的方案可以动态更新节点声誉值,并对各种节点进行分类。在评审团评委投票不低于 50%的前提下,共识成员中的恶意节点也可以从共识成员节点群中剔除。本文提出的方案有效提高了 rPBFT 共识机制的容错性,维护了联盟链网络的稳定性,保证了系统的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Computer Standards & Interfaces 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking. Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics. The journal • Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels • Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities • Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods • Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts • Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信