Long-term persistence to onabotulinumtoxinA to prevent chronic migraine: results from 11 years of patient data from a tertiary headache center.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae020
Leon S Moskatel, Anna Graber-Naidich, Zihuai He, Niushen Zhang
{"title":"Long-term persistence to onabotulinumtoxinA to prevent chronic migraine: results from 11 years of patient data from a tertiary headache center.","authors":"Leon S Moskatel, Anna Graber-Naidich, Zihuai He, Niushen Zhang","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if patients with chronic migraine continue onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) long-term.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using aggregated, de-identified patient data from the Stanford Headache Center. We included patients in California who received at least one prescription for onabotA during the years of 2011-2021. The primary outcome was the number of onabotA treatments each patient received. Secondary outcomes included sex, age, race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), distance to the treatment facility, and zip code income quartile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1551 patients received a mean of 7.60 ± 7.26 treatments and a median of 5 treatments, with 16.2% of patients receiving only one treatment and 10.6% receiving at least 19. Time-to-event survival analysis suggested 26.0% of patients would complete at least 29 treatments if able. Younger age and female sex were associated with statistically significant differences between quartile groups of number of onabotA treatments (P = .007, P = .015). BMI, distance to treatment facility, and zip code income quartile were not statistically significantly different between quartile groups (P > .500 for all). Prescriptions of both triptans and non-onabotA preventive medications showed a statistically significant increase with each higher quartile of number of onabotA treatments (P < .001; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We show long-term persistence to onabotA is high and that distance to treatment facility and income are not factors in continuation. Our work also demonstrates that as patients continue onabotA over time, there may be an increased need for adjunctive or alternative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if patients with chronic migraine continue onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) long-term.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using aggregated, de-identified patient data from the Stanford Headache Center. We included patients in California who received at least one prescription for onabotA during the years of 2011-2021. The primary outcome was the number of onabotA treatments each patient received. Secondary outcomes included sex, age, race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), distance to the treatment facility, and zip code income quartile.

Results: A total of 1551 patients received a mean of 7.60 ± 7.26 treatments and a median of 5 treatments, with 16.2% of patients receiving only one treatment and 10.6% receiving at least 19. Time-to-event survival analysis suggested 26.0% of patients would complete at least 29 treatments if able. Younger age and female sex were associated with statistically significant differences between quartile groups of number of onabotA treatments (P = .007, P = .015). BMI, distance to treatment facility, and zip code income quartile were not statistically significantly different between quartile groups (P > .500 for all). Prescriptions of both triptans and non-onabotA preventive medications showed a statistically significant increase with each higher quartile of number of onabotA treatments (P < .001; P < .001).

Discussion: We show long-term persistence to onabotA is high and that distance to treatment facility and income are not factors in continuation. Our work also demonstrates that as patients continue onabotA over time, there may be an increased need for adjunctive or alternative treatments.

长期坚持使用 OnabotulinumtoxinA 预防慢性偏头痛:一家三级头痛中心 11 年来的患者数据结果。
目的确定慢性偏头痛患者是否会长期服用阿博毒素(onabotulinumtoxinA,onabotA):我们使用斯坦福大学头痛中心汇总的、去标识化的患者数据进行了一项回顾性队列分析。我们纳入了 2011-2021 年间至少接受过一次奥那博特处方治疗的加州患者。主要结果是每位患者接受的奥那博特治疗次数。次要结果包括性别、年龄、种族、民族、体重指数 (BMI)、到治疗机构的距离以及邮政编码收入四分位数:共有 1551 名患者接受了平均 7.60 ± 7.26 次治疗,中位数为 5 次,其中 16.2% 的患者只接受了一次治疗,10.6% 的患者接受了至少 19 次治疗。从时间到事件的生存分析表明,26.0%的患者如果能够完成至少29次治疗。年龄较轻和女性性别与onabotA治疗次数四分位组之间的差异有显著统计学意义(p = 0.007,p = 0.015)。体重指数、到治疗机构的距离和邮政编码收入四分位数在四分位数组之间没有明显的统计学差异(均 p > 0.500)。随着奥那博特治疗次数四分位数的增加,三苯氧胺和非奥那博特预防性药物的处方量也出现了统计学意义上的显著增加(p 讨论):我们的研究结果表明,长期坚持使用奥那博特治疗的患者比例很高,而距离治疗机构的远近和收入并不是影响患者继续治疗的因素。我们的研究还表明,随着患者长期服用奥那博特,对辅助或替代治疗的需求可能会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信