Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty results in decreased incidence of anterior femoral notching compared to posterior referenced instrumented total knee arthroplasty.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
MingYang Li, YongTao Zhang, ZhenShuai Shao, HaoXiang Zhu
{"title":"Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty results in decreased incidence of anterior femoral notching compared to posterior referenced instrumented total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"MingYang Li, YongTao Zhang, ZhenShuai Shao, HaoXiang Zhu","doi":"10.1177/10225536241241122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is an uncommon but devastating complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anterior femoral notching (AFN) is one of a perioperative risk factor for PPF. The main purpose of this study was to compare between the rates of anterior femoral notching (AFN) and supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture (sPPF) of manual TKA and robotic arm-assisted TKA (RATKA). Meanwhile, blood loss, transfusion rates, inflammatory responses, complications, early clinical and radiological outcomes were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 330 patients (133 RATKA and 197 manual TKA). Differences in risks of inflammatory, blood loss, complications (periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection), pre-operative and post-operative distal lateral femoral angle (LDFA), distal femoral width (DFW), prosthesis-distal femoral width (PDFW) ratio, AFN, femoral component flexion angle (FCFA), peri-operative and post-operative functional outcomes between the RATKA and manual TKA groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time and postoperative CRP level in the RATKA group was significantly longer and higher than that in the manual TKA group (<i>p</i> < .001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative WBC level (<i>p</i> = .217), hemoglobin loss (<i>p</i> = .362), postoperative drainage (<i>p</i> = .836), and periprosthetic fracture (<i>p</i> = 1.000). There was no significant difference in LDFA (<i>p</i> > .05), DFW(<i>p</i> = .834), PDFW ratio (<i>p</i> = .089) and FCFA (<i>p</i> = .315) between the two groups, but the rate of AFN in the RATKA group was significantly lower than that in the manual TKA group (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups on POD3, POD 90 and 1 year (<i>p</i> < .05), but the FJS-12 score in the RATKA group was higher than that in the manual TKA group on 1 year (<i>p</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty can decrease the incidence of anterior femoral notching compared to posterior referenced instrumented total knee arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":"10225536241241122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241241122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is an uncommon but devastating complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anterior femoral notching (AFN) is one of a perioperative risk factor for PPF. The main purpose of this study was to compare between the rates of anterior femoral notching (AFN) and supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fracture (sPPF) of manual TKA and robotic arm-assisted TKA (RATKA). Meanwhile, blood loss, transfusion rates, inflammatory responses, complications, early clinical and radiological outcomes were also assessed.

Methods: This retrospective study included 330 patients (133 RATKA and 197 manual TKA). Differences in risks of inflammatory, blood loss, complications (periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection), pre-operative and post-operative distal lateral femoral angle (LDFA), distal femoral width (DFW), prosthesis-distal femoral width (PDFW) ratio, AFN, femoral component flexion angle (FCFA), peri-operative and post-operative functional outcomes between the RATKA and manual TKA groups were compared.

Results: The operation time and postoperative CRP level in the RATKA group was significantly longer and higher than that in the manual TKA group (p < .001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative WBC level (p = .217), hemoglobin loss (p = .362), postoperative drainage (p = .836), and periprosthetic fracture (p = 1.000). There was no significant difference in LDFA (p > .05), DFW(p = .834), PDFW ratio (p = .089) and FCFA (p = .315) between the two groups, but the rate of AFN in the RATKA group was significantly lower than that in the manual TKA group (p < .05). There was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups on POD3, POD 90 and 1 year (p < .05), but the FJS-12 score in the RATKA group was higher than that in the manual TKA group on 1 year (p = .001).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty can decrease the incidence of anterior femoral notching compared to posterior referenced instrumented total knee arthroplasty.

与后参照器械全膝关节置换术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术降低了股骨前切迹的发生率。
目的:假体周围骨折(PPF)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后一种不常见但具有破坏性的并发症。股骨前切迹(AFN)是 PPF 的围手术期风险因素之一。本研究的主要目的是比较人工膝关节置换术(TKA)和机械臂辅助膝关节置换术(RATKA)的股骨前切迹(AFN)和股骨髁上假体周围骨折(sPPF)的发生率。同时,还对失血量、输血率、炎症反应、并发症、早期临床和放射学结果进行了评估:这项回顾性研究纳入了 330 名患者(133 名 RATKA 和 197 名手动 TKA)。比较了RATKA组和人工TKA组的炎症风险、失血量、并发症(假体周围骨折和假体周围关节感染)、术前和术后股骨远端外侧角(LDFA)、股骨远端宽度(DFW)、假体-股骨远端宽度(PDFW)比率、AFN、股骨组件屈曲角(FCFA)、围手术期和术后功能结果的差异:结果:RATKA组的手术时间和术后CRP水平明显长于人工TKA组,且高于人工TKA组(P < .001)。然而,术后白细胞水平(p = .217)、血红蛋白损失(p = .362)、术后引流(p = .836)和假体周围骨折(p = 1.000)均无明显差异。两组间的LDFA(p > .05)、DFW(p = .834)、PDFW比值(p = .089)和FCFA(p = .315)无明显差异,但RATKA组的AFN率明显低于手动TKA组(p < .05)。两组在POD3、POD90和1年后的ROM无明显差异(P < .05),但RATKA组在1年后的FJS-12评分高于徒手TKA组(P = .001):结论:与后参照器械全膝关节置换术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术可降低股骨前切迹的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信