National pilot of entrustable professional activities in pathology residency training

IF 1.2 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Bronwyn H. Bryant MD , Scott R. Anderson MD , Mark Brissette MD , John M. Childs MD , Dita Gratzinger MD, PhD , Kristen Johnson PhD , Deborah E. Powell MD , Suzanne Zein-Eldin Powell MD , Charles F. Timmons MD, PhD , Deborah Chute MD , Thomas J. Cummings MD , Mary A. Furlong MD , Tiffany M. Hébert MD , Hollie M. Reeves DO , Demaretta Rush MD , Taisia Vitkovski DO , Cindy B. McCloskey MD
{"title":"National pilot of entrustable professional activities in pathology residency training","authors":"Bronwyn H. Bryant MD ,&nbsp;Scott R. Anderson MD ,&nbsp;Mark Brissette MD ,&nbsp;John M. Childs MD ,&nbsp;Dita Gratzinger MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kristen Johnson PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah E. Powell MD ,&nbsp;Suzanne Zein-Eldin Powell MD ,&nbsp;Charles F. Timmons MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah Chute MD ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Cummings MD ,&nbsp;Mary A. Furlong MD ,&nbsp;Tiffany M. Hébert MD ,&nbsp;Hollie M. Reeves DO ,&nbsp;Demaretta Rush MD ,&nbsp;Taisia Vitkovski DO ,&nbsp;Cindy B. McCloskey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2024.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are observable clinical skills and/or procedures that have been introduced into medical education at the student and resident levels in most specialties to determine readiness to advance into residency or independent practice, respectively. This publication describes the process and outcomes of a pilot study looking at the feasibility of using two anatomic pathology and two clinical pathology EPAs in pathology residency in 6 pathology residency programs that volunteered for the study. Faculty development on EPAs and their assessment was provided to pilot program faculty, and EPA assessment tools were developed and used by the pilot programs. Pre- and post-study surveys were given to participating residents, faculty, and program directors to gauge baseline practices and to gather feedback on the EPA implementation experience. Results demonstrated overall good feasibility in implementing EPAs. Faculty acceptance of EPAs varied and was less than that of program directors. Residents reported a significant increase in the frequency with which faculty provided formative assessments that included specific examples of performance and specific ways to improve, as well as increased frequency with which faculty provided summative assessments that included specific ways to improve. EPAs offered the most benefit in setting clear expectations for performance of each task, for providing more specific feedback to residents, and in increasing Program director's understanding of resident strengths abilities and weaknesses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289524000046/pdfft?md5=e481ebdd8885ac0feca110c216bc107d&pid=1-s2.0-S2374289524000046-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289524000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are observable clinical skills and/or procedures that have been introduced into medical education at the student and resident levels in most specialties to determine readiness to advance into residency or independent practice, respectively. This publication describes the process and outcomes of a pilot study looking at the feasibility of using two anatomic pathology and two clinical pathology EPAs in pathology residency in 6 pathology residency programs that volunteered for the study. Faculty development on EPAs and their assessment was provided to pilot program faculty, and EPA assessment tools were developed and used by the pilot programs. Pre- and post-study surveys were given to participating residents, faculty, and program directors to gauge baseline practices and to gather feedback on the EPA implementation experience. Results demonstrated overall good feasibility in implementing EPAs. Faculty acceptance of EPAs varied and was less than that of program directors. Residents reported a significant increase in the frequency with which faculty provided formative assessments that included specific examples of performance and specific ways to improve, as well as increased frequency with which faculty provided summative assessments that included specific ways to improve. EPAs offered the most benefit in setting clear expectations for performance of each task, for providing more specific feedback to residents, and in increasing Program director's understanding of resident strengths abilities and weaknesses.

全国病理学住院医师培训委托专业活动试点
可委托专业活动(EPAs)是可观察的临床技能和/或程序,已被引入大多数专科的学生和住院医师层次的医学教育中,分别用于判断学生是否准备好进入住院医师或独立执业。本刊物介绍了一项试点研究的过程和结果,该研究探讨了在自愿参与研究的 6 个病理学住院医师培训项目中,在病理学住院医师培训中使用两种解剖病理学和两种临床病理学 EPA 的可行性。为试点项目的教师提供了有关 EPA 及其评估的师资培训,试点项目开发并使用了 EPA 评估工具。对参与研究的住院医师、教师和项目主任进行了研究前和研究后调查,以评估基线实践并收集对 EPA 实施经验的反馈意见。结果表明,实施 EPA 的总体可行性良好。教职员工对 EPA 的接受程度各不相同,且低于项目主任。住院医师报告说,教师提供包括具体表现实例和具体改进方法在内的形成性评估的频率明显增加,教师提供包括具体改进方法在内的总结性评估的频率也有所增加。EPA 的最大益处在于为每项任务的绩效设定了明确的预期,为住院医师提供了更具体的反馈,并提高了项目主任对住院医师优势能力和劣势的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pathology
Academic Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信