Expression- and splicing-based multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies identified multiple genes for breast cancer by estrogen-receptor status.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Julian C McClellan, James L Li, Guimin Gao, Dezheng Huo
{"title":"Expression- and splicing-based multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies identified multiple genes for breast cancer by estrogen-receptor status.","authors":"Julian C McClellan, James L Li, Guimin Gao, Dezheng Huo","doi":"10.1186/s13058-024-01809-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although several transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been performed to identify genes associated with overall breast cancer (BC) risk, only a few TWAS have explored the differences in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer. Additionally, these studies were based on gene expression prediction models trained primarily in breast tissue, and they did not account for alternative splicing of genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we utilized two approaches to perform multi-tissue TWASs of breast cancer by ER subtype: (1) an expression-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals for each gene across multiple tissues and (2) a splicing-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals of all excised introns for each gene across tissues. To perform this TWAS, we utilized summary statistics for ER + BC from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and for ER- BC from a meta-analysis of BCAC and the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, we identified 230 genes in 86 loci that were associated with ER + BC and 66 genes in 29 loci that were associated with ER- BC at a Bonferroni threshold of significance. Of these genes, 2 genes associated with ER + BC at the 1q21.1 locus were located at least 1 Mb from published GWAS hits. For several well-studied tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and CHEK2 which have historically been thought to impact BC risk through rare, penetrant mutations, we discovered that common variants, which modulate gene expression, may additionally contribute to ER + or ER- etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study comprehensively examined how differences in common variation contribute to molecular differences between ER + and ER- BC and introduces a novel, splicing-based framework that can be used in future TWAS studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01809-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although several transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs) have been performed to identify genes associated with overall breast cancer (BC) risk, only a few TWAS have explored the differences in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer. Additionally, these studies were based on gene expression prediction models trained primarily in breast tissue, and they did not account for alternative splicing of genes.

Methods: In this study, we utilized two approaches to perform multi-tissue TWASs of breast cancer by ER subtype: (1) an expression-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals for each gene across multiple tissues and (2) a splicing-based TWAS that combined TWAS signals of all excised introns for each gene across tissues. To perform this TWAS, we utilized summary statistics for ER + BC from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and for ER- BC from a meta-analysis of BCAC and the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (CIMBA).

Results: In total, we identified 230 genes in 86 loci that were associated with ER + BC and 66 genes in 29 loci that were associated with ER- BC at a Bonferroni threshold of significance. Of these genes, 2 genes associated with ER + BC at the 1q21.1 locus were located at least 1 Mb from published GWAS hits. For several well-studied tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and CHEK2 which have historically been thought to impact BC risk through rare, penetrant mutations, we discovered that common variants, which modulate gene expression, may additionally contribute to ER + or ER- etiology.

Conclusions: Our study comprehensively examined how differences in common variation contribute to molecular differences between ER + and ER- BC and introduces a novel, splicing-based framework that can be used in future TWAS studies.

基于表达和剪接的多组织全转录组关联研究发现了多个与雌激素受体状态有关的乳腺癌基因。
背景:尽管已经开展了多项转录组关联研究(TWAS)来确定与乳腺癌(BC)总体风险相关的基因,但只有少数TWAS探讨了雌激素受体阳性(ER+)和雌激素受体阴性(ER-)乳腺癌的差异。此外,这些研究主要基于在乳腺组织中训练的基因表达预测模型,而且没有考虑基因的替代剪接:在这项研究中,我们采用了两种方法对ER亚型乳腺癌进行多组织TWAS:(1) 基于表达的TWAS,它综合了多个组织中每个基因的TWAS信号;(2) 基于剪接的TWAS,它综合了各组织中每个基因所有切除内含子的TWAS信号。为了进行TWAS,我们利用了乳腺癌协会联盟(BCAC)的ER+BC汇总统计数据,以及BCAC和BRCA1和BRCA2修饰研究者联盟(CIMBA)荟萃分析的ER-BC汇总统计数据:结果:我们总共在86个基因位点上发现了230个与ER+BC相关的基因,在29个基因位点上发现了66个与ER-BC相关的基因(Bonferroni显著性阈值)。在这些基因中,1q21.1位点上与ER+BC相关的2个基因与已发表的GWAS结果至少相差1Mb。对于TP53和CHEK2等几个已被充分研究的肿瘤抑制基因,人们一直认为它们是通过罕见的穿透性突变来影响BC风险的,但我们发现,调节基因表达的常见变异也可能会导致ER+或ER-病因:我们的研究全面考察了常见变异的差异如何导致ER+和ER- BC之间的分子差异,并引入了一个新颖的、基于剪接的框架,可用于未来的TWAS研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信