Facilitating Effects of Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Soil Health and Physiological Properties of Panax ginseng.

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Yu Zhan, Ergang Wang, Yi Zhou, Guixiang He, Pengyuan Lv, Lixiang Wang, Tingting Zhou, Xinyue Miao, Changbao Chen, Qiong Li
{"title":"Facilitating Effects of Reductive Soil Disinfestation on Soil Health and Physiological Properties of Panax ginseng.","authors":"Yu Zhan, Ergang Wang, Yi Zhou, Guixiang He, Pengyuan Lv, Lixiang Wang, Tingting Zhou, Xinyue Miao, Changbao Chen, Qiong Li","doi":"10.1007/s00248-024-02349-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical soil fumigation (CSF) and reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) have been proven to be effective agricultural strategies to improve soil quality, restructure microbial communities, and promote plant growth in soil degradation remediation. However, it is still unclear how RSD and CSF ensure soil and plant health by altering fungal communities. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of CSF with chloropicrin, and RSD with animal feces on soil properties, fungal communities and functional composition, and plant physiological characteristics were evaluated. Results showed that RSD and CSF treatment improved soil properties, restructured fungal community composition and structure, enhanced fungal interactions and functions, and facilitated plant growth. There was a significant increase in OM, AN, and AP contents in the soil with both CSF and RSD treatments compared to CK. Meanwhile, compared with CK and CSF, RSD treatment significantly increased biocontrol Chaetomium relative abundance while reducing pathogenic Neonectria relative abundance, indicating that RSD has strong inhibition potential. Furthermore, the microbial network of RSD treatment was more complex and interconnected, and the functions of plant pathogens, and animal pathogen were decreased. Importantly, RSD treatment significantly increased plant SOD, CAT, POD activity, SP, Ca, Zn content, and decreased MDA, ABA, Mg, K, and Fe content. In summary, RSD treatment is more effective than CSF treatment, by stimulating the proliferation of probiotic communities to further enhance soil health and plant disease resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18708,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology","volume":"87 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10957680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02349-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical soil fumigation (CSF) and reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) have been proven to be effective agricultural strategies to improve soil quality, restructure microbial communities, and promote plant growth in soil degradation remediation. However, it is still unclear how RSD and CSF ensure soil and plant health by altering fungal communities. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of CSF with chloropicrin, and RSD with animal feces on soil properties, fungal communities and functional composition, and plant physiological characteristics were evaluated. Results showed that RSD and CSF treatment improved soil properties, restructured fungal community composition and structure, enhanced fungal interactions and functions, and facilitated plant growth. There was a significant increase in OM, AN, and AP contents in the soil with both CSF and RSD treatments compared to CK. Meanwhile, compared with CK and CSF, RSD treatment significantly increased biocontrol Chaetomium relative abundance while reducing pathogenic Neonectria relative abundance, indicating that RSD has strong inhibition potential. Furthermore, the microbial network of RSD treatment was more complex and interconnected, and the functions of plant pathogens, and animal pathogen were decreased. Importantly, RSD treatment significantly increased plant SOD, CAT, POD activity, SP, Ca, Zn content, and decreased MDA, ABA, Mg, K, and Fe content. In summary, RSD treatment is more effective than CSF treatment, by stimulating the proliferation of probiotic communities to further enhance soil health and plant disease resistance.

Abstract Image

还原性土壤污染对三七土壤健康和生理特性的促进作用
化学土壤熏蒸(CSF)和还原性土壤消毒(RSD)已被证明是在土壤退化修复中改善土壤质量、重组微生物群落和促进植物生长的有效农业策略。然而,目前还不清楚 RSD 和 CSF 如何通过改变真菌群落来确保土壤和植物健康。研究人员进行了田间试验,研究含氯化苦的 CSF 和含动物粪便的 RSD 对土壤性质、真菌群落和功能组成的影响,并评估了植物的生理特征。结果表明,RSD 和 CSF 处理改善了土壤性质,重组了真菌群落组成和结构,增强了真菌的相互作用和功能,促进了植物生长。与 CK 相比,CSF 和 RSD 处理土壤中的 OM、AN 和 AP 含量都有明显增加。同时,与 CK 和 CSF 相比,RSD 处理显著提高了生防 Chaetomium 的相对丰度,同时降低了病原 Neonectria 的相对丰度,表明 RSD 具有很强的抑制潜力。此外,RSD 处理的微生物网络更加复杂和相互关联,植物病原菌和动物病原菌的功能降低。重要的是,RSD 处理明显提高了植物的 SOD、CAT、POD 活性、SP、Ca、Zn 含量,降低了 MDA、ABA、Mg、K 和 Fe 含量。总之,RSD 处理比 CSF 处理更有效,它能刺激益生菌群的增殖,进一步增强土壤健康和植物抗病性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Ecology
Microbial Ecology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Ecology was founded more than 50 years ago by Dr. Ralph Mitchell, Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Biology at Harvard University in Cambridge, MA. The journal has evolved to become a premier location for the presentation of manuscripts that represent advances in the field of microbial ecology. The journal has become a dedicated international forum for the presentation of high-quality scientific investigations of how microorganisms interact with their environment, with each other and with their hosts. Microbial Ecology offers articles of original research in full paper and note formats, as well as brief reviews and topical position papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信