[Peripheral Regional Anesthesia Techniques - Standards in Flux?!]

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Thomas Wiesmann, Thorsten Steinfeldt, Ann-Kristin Schubert
{"title":"[Peripheral Regional Anesthesia Techniques - Standards in Flux?!]","authors":"Thomas Wiesmann, Thorsten Steinfeldt, Ann-Kristin Schubert","doi":"10.1055/a-2065-7696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review article provides an overview of current developments in peripheral regional anaesthesia (RA). The authors present a subjective compilation based on discussions at professional events and inquiries to the Working Group on Regional Anaesthesia of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). The article addresses several relevant topics, including the handling of antithrombotic medication in peripheral blockades with reference to European guidelines, the debate on the discharge timing after plexus anaesthesia, and the consideration of rebound pain as an independent pain entity following RA.Furthermore, the contentious discussion regarding the administration of peripheral nerve blockades under general anaesthesia is illuminated. The authors express no fundamental concerns in this regard but emphasize the importance of preoperative evaluation and individual patient needs. The question of mixing local anaesthetics is also addressed, with the authors critically questioning this tradition and recommending the use of individual, long-acting substances.Another focal point is the application of peripheral nerve blockades in emergency medicine, both in preclinical and emergency room settings. The authors highlight the necessity for high-quality studies and discuss the complex organizational issues associated with the preclinical application of RA techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":7789,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie","volume":"59 3","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2065-7696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review article provides an overview of current developments in peripheral regional anaesthesia (RA). The authors present a subjective compilation based on discussions at professional events and inquiries to the Working Group on Regional Anaesthesia of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). The article addresses several relevant topics, including the handling of antithrombotic medication in peripheral blockades with reference to European guidelines, the debate on the discharge timing after plexus anaesthesia, and the consideration of rebound pain as an independent pain entity following RA.Furthermore, the contentious discussion regarding the administration of peripheral nerve blockades under general anaesthesia is illuminated. The authors express no fundamental concerns in this regard but emphasize the importance of preoperative evaluation and individual patient needs. The question of mixing local anaesthetics is also addressed, with the authors critically questioning this tradition and recommending the use of individual, long-acting substances.Another focal point is the application of peripheral nerve blockades in emergency medicine, both in preclinical and emergency room settings. The authors highlight the necessity for high-quality studies and discuss the complex organizational issues associated with the preclinical application of RA techniques.

[外周区域麻醉技术--不断变化的标准?]
这篇综述文章概述了外周区域麻醉(RA)目前的发展情况。作者根据在专业活动中的讨论以及向德国麻醉学和重症监护医学会(DGAI)区域麻醉工作组的询问,对文章进行了主观汇编。文章讨论了几个相关主题,包括参照欧洲指南处理外周阻滞中的抗血栓药物、关于神经丛麻醉后出院时间的争论以及将反跳痛视为 RA 后的一种独立疼痛实体。作者对此并无根本性担忧,但强调了术前评估和患者个体需求的重要性。另一个焦点是外周神经阻滞在急诊医学中的应用,包括在临床前和急诊室环境中的应用。作者强调了高质量研究的必要性,并讨论了与临床前应用 RA 技术相关的复杂组织问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AINS ist die Fachzeitschrift für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie im Georg Thieme Verlag. Sie vermittelt aktuelles Fachwissen und bietet Fortbildung. AINS hat sich das Ziel gesteckt, den Leserinnen und Lesern – Fachärzten und Weiterbildungsassistenten in der Anästhesiologie – immer praxisbezogenen Nutzwert und größtmögliche Unterstützung zu bieten.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信