Global paleobiogeography of Albian–Cenomanian (mid-Cretaceous) marine ostracods

Bernardo Vázquez-García , Jorge Villegas-Martín , Gerson Fauth , Leonardo Borghi , Aristóteles De Moraes Rios Netto
{"title":"Global paleobiogeography of Albian–Cenomanian (mid-Cretaceous) marine ostracods","authors":"Bernardo Vázquez-García ,&nbsp;Jorge Villegas-Martín ,&nbsp;Gerson Fauth ,&nbsp;Leonardo Borghi ,&nbsp;Aristóteles De Moraes Rios Netto","doi":"10.1016/j.jop.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite their potential for providing important information for paleobiogeography, studies using ostracod assemblages compiled from global datasets have been scarce so far. In this study, the paleogeographic implications of the relationship between different ostracod assemblages are analyzed and discussed for the Albian and Cenomanian. We compiled an ostracod dataset at the genus level, with 168 genera for the Albian and 174 for the Cenomanian, to which different multivariate statistical methods of grouping were applied. The affinity between different ostracod assemblages from different regions allowed for the delineation of 30 operational geographic units (OGUs) for the Albian, and 32 OGUs for the Cenomanian, grouped in three paleobiogeographic units (PBUs; Megatethys, Persia, and Austral) and one sub-unit (PBSU; Maghreb associated to the Megatethys). The Maghreb PBSU showed minor changes between the Albian and Cenomanian. The relationship among the OGUs grouped in each PBU is related to different factors, such as eustatic sea level events, similar climatic zones, and marine current circulation patterns. A relationship was observed between the Gabon and Nigeria OGUs with the Persia PBU, which suggests a direct east<strong>–</strong>west connection between them during the Cenomanian. The affinity observed in the Austral PBU between the South American, South African, and Australian regions during the Albian can be explained by their relative geographic isolation due to the Walvis Ridge barrier. The eventual flooding of this barrier led to the relationship observed between the SE Brazilian and Bolivian regions with the Austral PBU. Finally, the data also suggested that the separation of the Indian subcontinent from the Austral PBU took place during the Cenomanian.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeogeography","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 212-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383624000075/pdfft?md5=0da81baf40dfe530e711933cbab237d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2095383624000075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383624000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite their potential for providing important information for paleobiogeography, studies using ostracod assemblages compiled from global datasets have been scarce so far. In this study, the paleogeographic implications of the relationship between different ostracod assemblages are analyzed and discussed for the Albian and Cenomanian. We compiled an ostracod dataset at the genus level, with 168 genera for the Albian and 174 for the Cenomanian, to which different multivariate statistical methods of grouping were applied. The affinity between different ostracod assemblages from different regions allowed for the delineation of 30 operational geographic units (OGUs) for the Albian, and 32 OGUs for the Cenomanian, grouped in three paleobiogeographic units (PBUs; Megatethys, Persia, and Austral) and one sub-unit (PBSU; Maghreb associated to the Megatethys). The Maghreb PBSU showed minor changes between the Albian and Cenomanian. The relationship among the OGUs grouped in each PBU is related to different factors, such as eustatic sea level events, similar climatic zones, and marine current circulation patterns. A relationship was observed between the Gabon and Nigeria OGUs with the Persia PBU, which suggests a direct eastwest connection between them during the Cenomanian. The affinity observed in the Austral PBU between the South American, South African, and Australian regions during the Albian can be explained by their relative geographic isolation due to the Walvis Ridge barrier. The eventual flooding of this barrier led to the relationship observed between the SE Brazilian and Bolivian regions with the Austral PBU. Finally, the data also suggested that the separation of the Indian subcontinent from the Austral PBU took place during the Cenomanian.

阿尔卑斯-仙人掌纪(白垩纪中期)海洋梭形纲动物的全球古生物地理学
尽管它们有可能为古生物地理学提供重要信息,但迄今为止,利用全球数据集编制的浮游动物组合进行的研究还很少。在这项研究中,我们分析并讨论了不同的浮游动物群之间的关系对阿尔卑斯和仙人掌纪古生物地理学的影响。我们编制了一个属级的浮游动物数据集,其中阿尔比系有 168 个属,塞诺曼系有 174 个属,并采用了不同的多元统计分组方法。根据不同地区的不同梭形纲集合之间的亲缘关系,划分出了 30 个白垩纪可操作地理单元(OGUs)和 32 个仙人掌纪可操作地理单元(OGUs),分为三个古生物地理单元(PBUs;Megatethys、波斯和澳大拉西亚)和一个子单元(PBSU;与 Megatethys 相关的马格里布)。马格里布古地理单元在白垩纪和仙人掌纪之间变化不大。每个 PBU 中的 OGU 之间的关系与不同的因素有关,如震荡海平面事件、相似的气候带和海流环流模式。加蓬和尼日利亚 OGU 与波斯 PBU 之间的关系表明,在仙人掌纪,它们之间存在着直接的东西向联系。在澳大利亚 PBU 中观察到的阿尔卑斯时期南美洲、南非和澳大利亚地区之间的亲缘关系,可以用沃尔维斯海脊屏障造成的相对地理隔离来解释。这一屏障的最终淹没导致了巴西东南部和玻利维亚地区与南澳 PBU 之间的关系。最后,这些数据还表明,印度次大陆与澳大拉巴地区的分离发生在震旦纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信