Exploring the changes of individuals’ travel behavior in response to COVID-19 and their influencing factors based on mobile phone data

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shuli Zhou , Suhong Zhou , Fengrui Jing , Luhui Qi , Jianjun Li
{"title":"Exploring the changes of individuals’ travel behavior in response to COVID-19 and their influencing factors based on mobile phone data","authors":"Shuli Zhou ,&nbsp;Suhong Zhou ,&nbsp;Fengrui Jing ,&nbsp;Luhui Qi ,&nbsp;Jianjun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has produced a profound impact on travel behavior. Yet, few studies explored how individuals resist such impact to maintain their daily life from the perspective of people's responses. A comprehensive theoretical framework to elucidate individual travel behavior changes and a quantitative analysis of the pivotal factors driving these changes was lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study constructed a framework for individuals' travel behavior in response to COVID-19 and utilized anonymized mobile phone trajectory data before and during COVID-19 in Guangzhou to explore the changes of individuals’ travel behavior on workdays. Gradient boosting decision trees was used to quantify the degree of the factors driving travel changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the pandemic workdays, non-essential trips experienced a reduction of 51.4%, while essential trips decreased by 30.94%; Subway trips decreased by 1.63%, whereas motorized trips increased by 8.75%. The most significant decrease was observed in travel duration (50.92%), followed by travel frequency (41.28%), and travel distance (39.19%). The three travel indices displayed significant social disparities and spatial disparities. However, the relative relationships among these three travel indices did not vary with groups and spaces. Risk perception and intervention measures, emerged as primary drivers of individuals’ travel changes, contributing to 27%–35% of the total impact, while individual socio-economic characteristics and built environment accounting for less than 10%.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The results indicated that individuals curtailed both their essential and non-essential trips and adjusted their travel mode in response to the epidemic. These changes in travel purpose and mode led to differing reduction rates in travel frequency, duration, and distance. These findings contribute to individual travel changes prediction and fine-grained epidemic modelling during other public health emergencies like COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has produced a profound impact on travel behavior. Yet, few studies explored how individuals resist such impact to maintain their daily life from the perspective of people's responses. A comprehensive theoretical framework to elucidate individual travel behavior changes and a quantitative analysis of the pivotal factors driving these changes was lacking.

Methods

This study constructed a framework for individuals' travel behavior in response to COVID-19 and utilized anonymized mobile phone trajectory data before and during COVID-19 in Guangzhou to explore the changes of individuals’ travel behavior on workdays. Gradient boosting decision trees was used to quantify the degree of the factors driving travel changes.

Results

During the pandemic workdays, non-essential trips experienced a reduction of 51.4%, while essential trips decreased by 30.94%; Subway trips decreased by 1.63%, whereas motorized trips increased by 8.75%. The most significant decrease was observed in travel duration (50.92%), followed by travel frequency (41.28%), and travel distance (39.19%). The three travel indices displayed significant social disparities and spatial disparities. However, the relative relationships among these three travel indices did not vary with groups and spaces. Risk perception and intervention measures, emerged as primary drivers of individuals’ travel changes, contributing to 27%–35% of the total impact, while individual socio-economic characteristics and built environment accounting for less than 10%.

Implications

The results indicated that individuals curtailed both their essential and non-essential trips and adjusted their travel mode in response to the epidemic. These changes in travel purpose and mode led to differing reduction rates in travel frequency, duration, and distance. These findings contribute to individual travel changes prediction and fine-grained epidemic modelling during other public health emergencies like COVID-19.

基于手机数据的 COVID-19 个人出行行为变化及其影响因素探究
导言 COVID-19 大流行对旅行行为产生了深远的影响。然而,很少有研究从人们的反应角度探讨个人如何抵御这种影响以维持日常生活。本研究构建了个人应对 COVID-19 的出行行为框架,并利用广州 COVID-19 之前和期间的匿名手机轨迹数据,探讨个人工作日出行行为的变化。结果在大流行工作日,非必要出行减少了 51.4%,必要出行减少了 30.94%;地铁出行减少了 1.63%,而机动车出行增加了 8.75%。减少最明显的是旅行时间(50.92%),其次是旅行频率(41.28%)和旅行距离(39.19%)。这三个旅行指数显示出明显的社会差异和空间差异。然而,这三个出行指数之间的相对关系并不因群体和空间而异。风险认知和干预措施是个人出行变化的主要驱动因素,占总影响的 27%-35% ,而个人社会经济特征和建筑环境所占比例不到 10%。这些旅行目的和方式的改变导致了旅行频率、持续时间和距离的不同减少率。这些研究结果有助于预测个人的旅行变化,以及在其他公共卫生突发事件(如 COVID-19)期间建立精细的疫情模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信