CAN MUSCLE POWER TRAINING AID THE BIOMECHANICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS IN ENDURANCE RUNNERS?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Danilo Fonseca Leonel , Jonatas Ferreira Silva Santos , Alysson Afonso Nadalin Enes , Gustavo Oneda , Walter Luiz Arcanjo Júnior , Fernando Joaquim Gripp Lopes
{"title":"CAN MUSCLE POWER TRAINING AID THE BIOMECHANICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS IN ENDURANCE RUNNERS?","authors":"Danilo Fonseca Leonel ,&nbsp;Jonatas Ferreira Silva Santos ,&nbsp;Alysson Afonso Nadalin Enes ,&nbsp;Gustavo Oneda ,&nbsp;Walter Luiz Arcanjo Júnior ,&nbsp;Fernando Joaquim Gripp Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The performance of long-distance runners is predicted by the interaction between physical variables, and plyometric and endurance training can change the interaction between these variables. In this way, it becomes necessary to investigate these promoted adaptations and how their transfer to performance occurs.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to verify the combined effect of plyometric and endurance training on performance variables in long-distance runners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The sample consisted of 23 male runners between 18 and 50 years old, athletes of 10km races and divided into two experimental groups: combined training (CT; Plyometric + endurance training; n = 11) and isolated training (ET; endurance training only; n = 12). The volunteers were submitted to two moments of evaluation, performed before and after the experimental protocol, consisting of anthropometric evaluations, muscle power, running economy, biomechanical test, maximum progressive test, and 10-km performance. For the experimental protocol, the volunteers were divided into pairs into the ET or CT groups according to the result obtained in the 10-kilometer test performed before the start of training. At the end of the experimental protocol (8 weeks), the athletes were reassessed, and the tests used were the same as those used in the initial assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In muscle power tests, a significant increase in jumps (CMJ and SJ) was reported at the end of training, regardless of the evaluated group. In the biomechanical variables, an increase in contact time with the ground and vertical oscillation was found, in addition to a decrease in stride frequency and leg stiffness at the end of the training protocol, in both analyzed groups. Regarding the physiological variables, an increase in running economy, respiratory compensation points and peak velocity on treadmill was found, but VO<sub>2</sub>max remained stable after the experimental protocol. Finally, the final performance in the 10km did not show a significant effect, but the race strategy (initial phase) and peak velocity increased in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CT (endurance + plyometrics) elicited similar changes in muscle power, biomechanical, physiological and performance variables, when compared to runners who performed ET.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Even with the lowest volume of running in the CT group, the effects were similar to the group that only performed ET, a relevant finding when considering that a high volume of running training can lead to injuries due to stress or repetition. Based on our findings, it is recommended to include neuromuscular training in weekly training routines, with the insertion of activities aimed at improving contact with the ground, technical efficiency and energy use of the muscle stretching-shortening cycle. It is also suggested that the neuromuscular training load is established according to the periodization and is frequently controlled from the optimal height of the vertical jump. Finally, plyometric activities should be included in specific periods of the training routine, in which the main objective is to improve muscular power.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524001059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The performance of long-distance runners is predicted by the interaction between physical variables, and plyometric and endurance training can change the interaction between these variables. In this way, it becomes necessary to investigate these promoted adaptations and how their transfer to performance occurs.

Objectives

The study aimed to verify the combined effect of plyometric and endurance training on performance variables in long-distance runners.

Methods

The sample consisted of 23 male runners between 18 and 50 years old, athletes of 10km races and divided into two experimental groups: combined training (CT; Plyometric + endurance training; n = 11) and isolated training (ET; endurance training only; n = 12). The volunteers were submitted to two moments of evaluation, performed before and after the experimental protocol, consisting of anthropometric evaluations, muscle power, running economy, biomechanical test, maximum progressive test, and 10-km performance. For the experimental protocol, the volunteers were divided into pairs into the ET or CT groups according to the result obtained in the 10-kilometer test performed before the start of training. At the end of the experimental protocol (8 weeks), the athletes were reassessed, and the tests used were the same as those used in the initial assessment.

Results

In muscle power tests, a significant increase in jumps (CMJ and SJ) was reported at the end of training, regardless of the evaluated group. In the biomechanical variables, an increase in contact time with the ground and vertical oscillation was found, in addition to a decrease in stride frequency and leg stiffness at the end of the training protocol, in both analyzed groups. Regarding the physiological variables, an increase in running economy, respiratory compensation points and peak velocity on treadmill was found, but VO2max remained stable after the experimental protocol. Finally, the final performance in the 10km did not show a significant effect, but the race strategy (initial phase) and peak velocity increased in both groups.

Conclusion

CT (endurance + plyometrics) elicited similar changes in muscle power, biomechanical, physiological and performance variables, when compared to runners who performed ET.

Implications

Even with the lowest volume of running in the CT group, the effects were similar to the group that only performed ET, a relevant finding when considering that a high volume of running training can lead to injuries due to stress or repetition. Based on our findings, it is recommended to include neuromuscular training in weekly training routines, with the insertion of activities aimed at improving contact with the ground, technical efficiency and energy use of the muscle stretching-shortening cycle. It is also suggested that the neuromuscular training load is established according to the periodization and is frequently controlled from the optimal height of the vertical jump. Finally, plyometric activities should be included in specific periods of the training routine, in which the main objective is to improve muscular power.

肌肉力量训练是否有助于耐力跑运动员的生物力学和生理适应?
背景长跑运动员的成绩是通过身体变量之间的相互作用来预测的,而负重和耐力训练可以改变这些变量之间的相互作用。方法样本由 23 名年龄在 18 至 50 岁之间的男性长跑运动员组成,他们都是 10 公里比赛的运动员,分为两个实验组:联合训练组(CT;负重负重训练+耐力训练;n = 11)和孤立训练组(ET;仅耐力训练;n = 12)。志愿者在实验方案前后接受了两次评估,包括人体测量评估、肌肉力量、跑步经济性、生物力学测试、最大进步测试和 10 公里成绩。在实验方案中,根据训练开始前进行的 10 公里测试结果,志愿者被分成两对,一组为 ET 组,另一组为 CT 组。在实验方案结束时(8 周),对运动员进行了重新评估,所使用的测试与最初评估时使用的测试相同。在生物力学变量方面,两个分析组都发现,训练结束时,除了步频和腿部僵硬度下降外,与地面的接触时间和垂直摆动也增加了。在生理变量方面,发现跑步经济性、呼吸补偿点和跑步机上的峰值速度都有所增加,但最大氧饱和度在实验方案结束后保持稳定。结论与进行 ET 的跑步者相比,CT(耐力 + 负重)在肌肉力量、生物力学、生理和成绩变量方面引起了相似的变化。意义即使 CT 组的跑步量最小,其效果也与只进行 ET 的组相似,考虑到大运动量的跑步训练可能会因压力或重复而导致受伤,这是一个相关的发现。根据我们的研究结果,建议将神经肌肉训练纳入每周的例行训练中,并加入旨在改善与地面接触、技术效率和肌肉拉伸-缩短周期能量利用的活动。此外,还建议根据周期确定神经肌肉训练负荷,并经常从纵跳的最佳高度进行控制。最后,应在日常训练的特定时段进行负重活动,其主要目的是提高肌肉力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信