“Winner” versus “loser” streets? Pedestrianisation and intra-neighbourhood equity

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Samuel Nello-Deakin
{"title":"“Winner” versus “loser” streets? Pedestrianisation and intra-neighbourhood equity","authors":"Samuel Nello-Deakin","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study provides a qualitative exploration of the spatial equity implications of Barcelona's superblocks strategy, focusing on the newly pedestrianised “green axes” implemented in 2023. By examining the extent to which pedestrianisation may contribute to the creation of “winner” and “loser” streets in the same neighbourhood, the study complements previous literature in this area, which has mainly focused on assessing spatial equity between different neighbourhoods. The study is based on 11 qualitative interviews and a focus group with key stakeholders involved in the design and implementation of the superblocks plan. In the findings, I review the main spatial equity implications of the new green axes, identify trade-offs between equity and viability of implementation, and examine the measures taken by the municipality to minimise inequities between streets. My findings show that the spatial equity implications of pedestrianisation are complex and multidimensional. Although pedestrianisation may strengthen inequities between streets, the gains experienced by pedestrianised streets are not limited to residents living on those streets. However, pedestrianised streets risk becoming a victim of their success, experiencing significant public space and gentrification pressures. Transforming more streets simultaneously might contribute to spread these pressures more evenly, but risks creating greater political and social backlash.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000049/pdfft?md5=f11e00e31edc2d5e673b4e90dc820c57&pid=1-s2.0-S2667091724000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides a qualitative exploration of the spatial equity implications of Barcelona's superblocks strategy, focusing on the newly pedestrianised “green axes” implemented in 2023. By examining the extent to which pedestrianisation may contribute to the creation of “winner” and “loser” streets in the same neighbourhood, the study complements previous literature in this area, which has mainly focused on assessing spatial equity between different neighbourhoods. The study is based on 11 qualitative interviews and a focus group with key stakeholders involved in the design and implementation of the superblocks plan. In the findings, I review the main spatial equity implications of the new green axes, identify trade-offs between equity and viability of implementation, and examine the measures taken by the municipality to minimise inequities between streets. My findings show that the spatial equity implications of pedestrianisation are complex and multidimensional. Although pedestrianisation may strengthen inequities between streets, the gains experienced by pedestrianised streets are not limited to residents living on those streets. However, pedestrianised streets risk becoming a victim of their success, experiencing significant public space and gentrification pressures. Transforming more streets simultaneously might contribute to spread these pressures more evenly, but risks creating greater political and social backlash.

"赢家 "街道与 "输家 "街道?步行化与街区内的公平性
本研究从定性角度探讨了巴塞罗那超级街区战略对空间公平的影响,重点关注2023年新实施的步行化 "绿轴"。通过研究步行化在多大程度上会导致同一街区出现 "赢家 "和 "输家 "街道,本研究对该领域以往的文献进行了补充,这些文献主要侧重于评估不同街区之间的空间公平性。本研究基于 11 个定性访谈和一个焦点小组,访谈对象是参与超级街区计划设计和实施的主要利益相关者。在研究结果中,我回顾了新绿轴对空间公平的主要影响,确定了公平与实施可行性之间的权衡,并研究了市政当局为尽量减少街道之间的不公平而采取的措施。我的研究结果表明,步行街化对空间公平的影响是复杂和多方面的。虽然步行街可能会加剧街道之间的不平等,但步行街所带来的收益并不局限于居住在这些街道上的居民。然而,步行街有可能成为其成功的牺牲品,承受巨大的公共空间和绅士化压力。同时改造更多的街道可能有助于更均匀地分散这些压力,但也有可能造成更大的政治和社会反弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信