A Canadian survey of perceptions and practices related to ordering of blood tests in the intensive care unit.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
M Omair Rahman, Emannuel Charbonney, Ryan Vaisler, Abubaker Khalifa, Waleed Alhazzani, Kiera Gossack-Keenan, Allan Garland, Timothy Karachi, Erick Duan, Sean M Bagshaw, Maureen O Meade, Chris Hillis, Peter Kavsak, Karen Born, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Deborah Siegal, Tina Millen, Damon Scales, Andre Amaral, Shane English, Victoria A McCredie, Peter Dodek, Deborah J Cook, Bram Rochwerg
{"title":"A Canadian survey of perceptions and practices related to ordering of blood tests in the intensive care unit.","authors":"M Omair Rahman, Emannuel Charbonney, Ryan Vaisler, Abubaker Khalifa, Waleed Alhazzani, Kiera Gossack-Keenan, Allan Garland, Timothy Karachi, Erick Duan, Sean M Bagshaw, Maureen O Meade, Chris Hillis, Peter Kavsak, Karen Born, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Deborah Siegal, Tina Millen, Damon Scales, Andre Amaral, Shane English, Victoria A McCredie, Peter Dodek, Deborah J Cook, Bram Rochwerg","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02745-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ordering of routine blood test panels in advance is common in intensive care units (ICUs), with limited consideration of the pretest probability of finding abnormalities. This practice contributes to anemia, false positive results, and health care costs. We sought to understand practices and attitudes of Canadian adult intensivists regarding ordering of blood tests in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide Canadian cross-sectional survey consisting of 15 questions assessing three domains (global perceptions, test ordering, daily practice), plus 11 demographic questions. The target sample was one intensivist per adult ICU in Canada. We summarized responses using descriptive statistics and present data as mean with standard deviation (SD) or count with percentage as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over seven months, 80/131 (61%) physicians responded from 77 ICUs, 50% of which were from Ontario. Respondents had a mean (SD) clinical experience of 12 (9) years, and 61% worked in academic centres. When asked about their perceptions of how frequently unnecessary blood tests are ordered, 61% responded \"sometimes\" and 23% responded \"almost always.\" Fifty-seven percent favoured ordering complete blood counts one day in advance. Only 24% of respondents believed that advanced blood test ordering frequently led to changes in management. The most common factors perceived to influence blood test ordering in the ICU were physician preferences, institutional patterns, and order sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents to this survey perceived that unnecessary blood testing occurs in the ICU. The survey identified possible strategies to decrease the number of blood tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"1137-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02745-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The ordering of routine blood test panels in advance is common in intensive care units (ICUs), with limited consideration of the pretest probability of finding abnormalities. This practice contributes to anemia, false positive results, and health care costs. We sought to understand practices and attitudes of Canadian adult intensivists regarding ordering of blood tests in critically ill patients.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide Canadian cross-sectional survey consisting of 15 questions assessing three domains (global perceptions, test ordering, daily practice), plus 11 demographic questions. The target sample was one intensivist per adult ICU in Canada. We summarized responses using descriptive statistics and present data as mean with standard deviation (SD) or count with percentage as appropriate.

Results: Over seven months, 80/131 (61%) physicians responded from 77 ICUs, 50% of which were from Ontario. Respondents had a mean (SD) clinical experience of 12 (9) years, and 61% worked in academic centres. When asked about their perceptions of how frequently unnecessary blood tests are ordered, 61% responded "sometimes" and 23% responded "almost always." Fifty-seven percent favoured ordering complete blood counts one day in advance. Only 24% of respondents believed that advanced blood test ordering frequently led to changes in management. The most common factors perceived to influence blood test ordering in the ICU were physician preferences, institutional patterns, and order sets.

Conclusion: Most respondents to this survey perceived that unnecessary blood testing occurs in the ICU. The survey identified possible strategies to decrease the number of blood tests.

Abstract Image

加拿大关于重症监护病房血液化验订单的认知和实践调查。
目的:在重症监护病房(ICU)中,提前订购血常规全套化验单的做法很常见,但对检验前发现异常的概率考虑有限。这种做法会导致贫血、假阳性结果和医疗成本。我们试图了解加拿大成年重症监护医生在为重症患者开具血液化验单方面的做法和态度:我们在加拿大全国范围内开展了一项横断面调查,其中包括 15 个问题,评估三个领域(总体看法、化验单、日常实践),以及 11 个人口统计学问题。目标样本是加拿大每个成人重症监护病房的一名重症监护医师。我们使用描述性统计方法对回答进行了总结,并根据情况以平均值加标准差(SD)或计数加百分比的形式呈现数据:在七个月的时间里,来自 77 个重症监护室的 80/131 名(61%)医生做出了回复,其中 50%来自安大略省。受访者的平均(标清)临床经验为 12(9)年,61% 的受访者在学术中心工作。当被问及他们对不必要的血液化验单开具频率的看法时,61% 的受访者回答 "有时",23% 的受访者回答 "几乎总是"。57%的人赞成提前一天订购全血细胞计数。只有 24% 的受访者认为,提前下达血液化验单经常会导致管理上的变化。影响重症监护病房血液化验单开具的最常见因素是医生的偏好、机构模式和订单设置:结论:本次调查的大多数受访者认为,重症监护病房存在不必要的血液化验。调查确定了减少血液化验次数的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信