Training Cerebrovascular and Neuroendovascular Surgery Residents: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tyler Scullen, James Milburn, Mansour Mathkour, Angela Larrota, Oluyinka Aduloju, Aaron Dumont, John Nerva, Peter Amenta, Arthur Wang
{"title":"Training Cerebrovascular and Neuroendovascular Surgery Residents: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations.","authors":"Tyler Scullen, James Milburn, Mansour Mathkour, Angela Larrota, Oluyinka Aduloju, Aaron Dumont, John Nerva, Peter Amenta, Arthur Wang","doi":"10.31486/toj.23.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rapid evolution of neuroendovascular intervention has resulted in the inclusion of endovascular techniques as a core competency in neurosurgical residency training. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a literature review of studies involving the training of neurosurgical residents in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery. We reviewed the evolution of cerebrovascular neurosurgery and the effects of these changes on residency, and we propose interventions to supplement contemporary training. <b>Results:</b> A total of 48 studies were included for full review. Studies evaluated trainee education and competency (29.2%, 14/48), neuroendovascular training models (20.8%, 10/48), and open cerebrovascular training models (52.1%, 25/48), with some overlap. We used a qualitative analysis of reviewed reports to generate a series of suggested training supplements to optimize cerebrovascular education. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cerebrovascular neurosurgery is at a crossroads where trainees must develop disparate skill sets with inverse trends in volume. Continued longitudinal exposure to both endovascular and open cerebrovascular surgical fields should be mandated in general resident education, and blended learning tactics using adjunct simulation systems and models should be incorporated with didactics to both optimize learning and alleviate restraints placed by decreased volume and autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.23.0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rapid evolution of neuroendovascular intervention has resulted in the inclusion of endovascular techniques as a core competency in neurosurgical residency training. Methods: We conducted a literature review of studies involving the training of neurosurgical residents in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery. We reviewed the evolution of cerebrovascular neurosurgery and the effects of these changes on residency, and we propose interventions to supplement contemporary training. Results: A total of 48 studies were included for full review. Studies evaluated trainee education and competency (29.2%, 14/48), neuroendovascular training models (20.8%, 10/48), and open cerebrovascular training models (52.1%, 25/48), with some overlap. We used a qualitative analysis of reviewed reports to generate a series of suggested training supplements to optimize cerebrovascular education. Conclusion: Cerebrovascular neurosurgery is at a crossroads where trainees must develop disparate skill sets with inverse trends in volume. Continued longitudinal exposure to both endovascular and open cerebrovascular surgical fields should be mandated in general resident education, and blended learning tactics using adjunct simulation systems and models should be incorporated with didactics to both optimize learning and alleviate restraints placed by decreased volume and autonomy.

培训脑血管和神经内血管外科住院医生:系统性文献综述和建议。
背景:神经血管内介入技术的快速发展促使神经外科住院医师培训将血管内介入技术列为核心能力。方法:我们对涉及神经外科住院医师脑血管和血管内神经外科培训的研究进行了文献综述。我们回顾了脑血管神经外科的演变以及这些变化对住院医师培训的影响,并提出了补充当代培训的干预措施。结果:共纳入 48 项研究进行全面审查。研究评估了学员教育和能力(29.2%,14/48)、神经内血管培训模式(20.8%,10/48)和开放式脑血管培训模式(52.1%,25/48),其中有一些重叠。我们采用定性分析的方法对所查阅的报告进行了分析,得出了一系列优化脑血管教育的培训补充建议。结论:脑血管神经外科正处于一个十字路口,受训者必须发展不同的技能组合,而数量却呈反比趋势。在普通住院医师教育中,应强制要求继续纵向接触血管内和开放式脑血管外科领域,并将使用辅助模拟系统和模型的混合学习策略与教学法相结合,以优化学习效果,并减轻因工作量和自主性减少而带来的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信