Advancing Transportation Equity and Safety Through Autonomous Vehicles.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0107
Johnathon P Ehsani, Jeffrey P Michael, Takeru Igusa, Joshua Mueller, Chia-Hsiu Chang, Gayane Yenokyan
{"title":"Advancing Transportation Equity and Safety Through Autonomous Vehicles.","authors":"Johnathon P Ehsani, Jeffrey P Michael, Takeru Igusa, Joshua Mueller, Chia-Hsiu Chang, Gayane Yenokyan","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States, and disproportionately impact communities of color. Replacing human control with automated vehicles (AVs) holds the potential to reduce crashes and save lives. The benefits of AVs, including automated shuttles, buses, or cars could extend beyond safety to include improvements in congestion, reductions in emissions, and increased access to mobility, particularly for vulnerable populations. However, AVs have not attained the level of public trust that has been expected, given their potential to save lives and increase access to mobility. Public opinion surveys have highlighted safety and security concerns as reasons for this lack of confidence. In this study, we present the findings of an experiment we conducted to actively shift mindsets on AVs toward advancing health equity. We demonstrate through a nationally representative sample of 2265 U.S. adults that the public support for AVs can be improved by expanding their scope of application to include advancing social benefit. The survey began with questions on respondent's support for AVs based on <i>a priori</i> knowledge and beliefs. Consistent with prior surveys, baseline support (strong support and some degree of support) was low at 26.4% (95% confidence interval 24.0-29.0). After introducing information about how AVs could be used to provide mobility for older adults, those with limited income, or the vision-impaired, respondents were asked to reassess their support for AVs. Support significantly increased to include the majority of respondents. By prioritizing the deployment of AVs to serve individuals and communities in greatest need of mobility, AVs would not only demonstrate compelling social value by reducing disparities but would also gain widespread public support among the U.S. public.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"143-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death in the United States, and disproportionately impact communities of color. Replacing human control with automated vehicles (AVs) holds the potential to reduce crashes and save lives. The benefits of AVs, including automated shuttles, buses, or cars could extend beyond safety to include improvements in congestion, reductions in emissions, and increased access to mobility, particularly for vulnerable populations. However, AVs have not attained the level of public trust that has been expected, given their potential to save lives and increase access to mobility. Public opinion surveys have highlighted safety and security concerns as reasons for this lack of confidence. In this study, we present the findings of an experiment we conducted to actively shift mindsets on AVs toward advancing health equity. We demonstrate through a nationally representative sample of 2265 U.S. adults that the public support for AVs can be improved by expanding their scope of application to include advancing social benefit. The survey began with questions on respondent's support for AVs based on a priori knowledge and beliefs. Consistent with prior surveys, baseline support (strong support and some degree of support) was low at 26.4% (95% confidence interval 24.0-29.0). After introducing information about how AVs could be used to provide mobility for older adults, those with limited income, or the vision-impaired, respondents were asked to reassess their support for AVs. Support significantly increased to include the majority of respondents. By prioritizing the deployment of AVs to serve individuals and communities in greatest need of mobility, AVs would not only demonstrate compelling social value by reducing disparities but would also gain widespread public support among the U.S. public.

通过自动驾驶汽车促进交通公平与安全。
机动车撞车事故是美国人死亡的主要原因,对有色人种社区的影响尤为严重。用自动驾驶汽车(AVs)取代人工控制,有可能减少车祸,挽救生命。自动驾驶汽车(包括自动驾驶班车、公共汽车或小汽车)的益处不仅限于安全,还包括改善交通拥堵、减少排放以及增加出行机会,尤其是对弱势群体而言。然而,鉴于自动驾驶汽车具有拯救生命和增加出行机会的潜力,其尚未达到预期的公众信任度。民意调查强调,安全和安保问题是公众缺乏信任的原因。在本研究中,我们介绍了一项实验的结果,该实验旨在积极转变人们对自动驾驶汽车的看法,以促进健康公平。我们通过对 2265 名美国成年人进行全国代表性抽样调查,证明可以通过扩大自动驾驶汽车的应用范围,将促进社会福利纳入其中,从而提高公众对自动驾驶汽车的支持。调查以受访者基于先验知识和信念对自动驾驶汽车的支持度为起点。与之前的调查一致,基线支持率(强烈支持和一定程度支持)较低,为 26.4%(95% 置信区间为 24.0-29.0)。在介绍了如何利用自动驾驶汽车为老年人、收入有限者或视力受损者提供出行便利的信息后,受访者被要求重新评估他们对自动驾驶汽车的支持程度。支持率明显提高,大多数受访者都表示支持。通过优先部署自动驾驶汽车,为最需要出行的个人和社区提供服务,自动驾驶汽车不仅可以通过缩小差距体现出令人信服的社会价值,还将获得美国公众的广泛支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信