Real-World Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) in Comparison with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4is) for Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RELATE).

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01354-2
Xi Tan, Victoria Divino, James Amamoo, Lin Xie, Katharine B Coyle, Cory L Gamble, Mico Guevarra, Yurek Paprocki, Aaron A King
{"title":"Real-World Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) in Comparison with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4is) for Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RELATE).","authors":"Xi Tan, Victoria Divino, James Amamoo, Lin Xie, Katharine B Coyle, Cory L Gamble, Mico Guevarra, Yurek Paprocki, Aaron A King","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01354-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has been established in several trials in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, real-world evidence on their effectiveness is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of OW GLP-1RA regarding glycemic and weight outcomes, and relative to DPP-4i in a comparator analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study evaluated glycated hemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) and weight outcomes in people with T2DM with two or more prescription claims for the same OW GLP-1RA using a pre-post study design (including for a semaglutide OW T2DM subgroup, hereafter referred to as semaglutide). Comparator analysis for the same outcome was performed for OW GLP-1RAs versus DPP-4i and semaglutide subgroup versus DPP-4i. A linked patient population from the IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus database and the Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (AEMR) database was analyzed using data from January 2017 to April 2022. HbA<sub>1c</sub> and weight were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month post-index period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics in the comparator analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pre-post analysis, a greater numerical reduction in HbA<sub>1c</sub> and weight was observed for the semaglutide subgroup (N = 354) relative to the OW GLP-1RA cohort (N = 921). In the semaglutide subgroup, 52.5% and 34.2% of patients achieved HbA<sub>1c</sub> of < 7.0% and ≥ 5% weight loss, respectively. For the comparator analysis, the OW GLP-1RAs (N = 651) were significantly more effective (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA<sub>1c</sub> (- 1.5% vs. -  1.0%) and weight (- 3.2 kg vs. -  1.0 kg) than the DPP-4is (N = 431). Similarly, the semaglutide cohort (N = 251) also displayed more effectiveness (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA<sub>1c</sub> (- 1.7% vs. -  0.9%) and weight (- 4.1 kg vs. -  1.3 kg) than the respective DPP-4i cohort (N = 417). Patients initiating OW GLP-1RAs, including the semaglutide cohort, were at least twice as likely to achieve HbA<sub>1c</sub> and weight outcomes as well as composite outcomes compared with those initiating DPP-4is.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reinforces that OW GLP-1RAs are more effective in glycemic control and weight reduction compared with DPP-4is in people with T2DM in the real-world setting. These findings align with the recommendation in the current guidelines for utilizing glucose-lowering treatment regimens that support weight-management goals in people with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"271-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10980663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01354-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has been established in several trials in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, real-world evidence on their effectiveness is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of OW GLP-1RA regarding glycemic and weight outcomes, and relative to DPP-4i in a comparator analysis.

Methods: This observational cohort study evaluated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight outcomes in people with T2DM with two or more prescription claims for the same OW GLP-1RA using a pre-post study design (including for a semaglutide OW T2DM subgroup, hereafter referred to as semaglutide). Comparator analysis for the same outcome was performed for OW GLP-1RAs versus DPP-4i and semaglutide subgroup versus DPP-4i. A linked patient population from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database and the Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (AEMR) database was analyzed using data from January 2017 to April 2022. HbA1c and weight were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month post-index period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics in the comparator analysis.

Results: In the pre-post analysis, a greater numerical reduction in HbA1c and weight was observed for the semaglutide subgroup (N = 354) relative to the OW GLP-1RA cohort (N = 921). In the semaglutide subgroup, 52.5% and 34.2% of patients achieved HbA1c of < 7.0% and ≥ 5% weight loss, respectively. For the comparator analysis, the OW GLP-1RAs (N = 651) were significantly more effective (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.5% vs. -  1.0%) and weight (- 3.2 kg vs. -  1.0 kg) than the DPP-4is (N = 431). Similarly, the semaglutide cohort (N = 251) also displayed more effectiveness (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.7% vs. -  0.9%) and weight (- 4.1 kg vs. -  1.3 kg) than the respective DPP-4i cohort (N = 417). Patients initiating OW GLP-1RAs, including the semaglutide cohort, were at least twice as likely to achieve HbA1c and weight outcomes as well as composite outcomes compared with those initiating DPP-4is.

Conclusion: The study reinforces that OW GLP-1RAs are more effective in glycemic control and weight reduction compared with DPP-4is in people with T2DM in the real-world setting. These findings align with the recommendation in the current guidelines for utilizing glucose-lowering treatment regimens that support weight-management goals in people with T2DM.

Abstract Image

每周一次的胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(OW GLP-1RAs)与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP-4is)对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和体重结果的实际效果比较 (RELATE)。
背景:每周一次(OW)胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的疗效已在多项试验中得到证实;然而,有关其疗效的实际证据却很有限。本研究评估了OW GLP-1RA在血糖和体重结果方面的有效性,以及在对比分析中与DPP-4i相比的有效性:这项观察性队列研究采用前-后研究设计,评估了T2DM患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和体重结果,这些患者有两次或两次以上处方申请使用同一种OW GLP-1RA(包括semaglutide OW T2DM亚组,以下简称semaglutide)。针对同一结果,还进行了OW GLP-1RA与DPP-4i以及semaglutide亚组与DPP-4i的比较分析。利用2017年1月至2022年4月的数据分析了来自IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus数据库和非住院电子病历(AEMR)数据库的关联患者群体。HbA1c和体重在基线和指数后12个月期末进行评估。在对比分析中,采用了逆概率治疗加权法(IPTW)来调整基线患者特征的不平衡:结果:在前后分析中观察到,与OW GLP-1RA队列(N = 921)相比,塞马鲁肽亚组(N = 354)的HbA1c和体重下降幅度更大。在semaglutide亚组中,分别有52.5%和34.2%的患者实现了HbA1c<7.0%和体重下降≥5%。在对比分析中,OW GLP-1RAs(N = 651)在降低 HbA1c(- 1.5% vs. - 1.0%)和减轻体重(- 3.2 kg vs. - 1.0 kg)方面的效果(p < 0.001)明显优于 DPP-4is(N = 431)。同样,在降低 HbA1c(- 1.7% vs. - 0.9%)和减轻体重(- 4.1 kg vs. - 1.3 kg)方面,semaglutide 组(N = 251)也比相应的 DPP-4i 组(N = 417)更有效(p < 0.001)。与开始使用DPP-4i的患者相比,开始使用OW GLP-1RAs(包括semaglutide队列)的患者达到HbA1c和体重结果以及综合结果的可能性至少是开始使用DPP-4i患者的两倍:结论:本研究证实,在现实环境中,OW GLP-1RA 与 DPP-4is 相比,对 T2DM 患者的血糖控制和体重减轻更有效。这些研究结果与现行指南中的建议一致,即对 T2DM 患者采用支持体重管理目标的降糖治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信