Considerations for a threatened seabird: The impact of shoreline avian predators on at-sea marbled murrelets

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 Environmental Science
Sonya A. Pastran, David B. Lank
{"title":"Considerations for a threatened seabird: The impact of shoreline avian predators on at-sea marbled murrelets","authors":"Sonya A. Pastran, David B. Lank","doi":"10.1002/wsb.1514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We tested the influence of on-shore avian predators on the at-sea distribution and abundance of marbled murrelets (<i>Brachyramphus marmoratus</i>) during their breeding season in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a field experiment using deterrent predator decoy kites that mimicked flying bald eagles (<i>Haliaeetus leucocephalus</i>). In the summers of 2018 and 2019, we conducted at-sea surveys of murrelet distributions along inshore and offshore transects with and without kites flying, and tallied real eagles along the shoreline and fish schools encountered. Kites negatively influenced overall murrelet counts (estimate = −1.19, 95% CI = −1.88 to −0.51), but we did not detect inshore to offshore movements within the study site. Our results indicate murrelet movement out of the study area in response to the kites. Overall murrelet counts were also lower when real eagle counts were higher (estimate = −0.22, 95% CI = −0.35 to −0.09). When kites were flying, a higher proportion of the murrelets remaining along inshore transects were found between rather than adjacent to kite locations (estimate = −1.61, 95% CI = −2.67 to −0.54), indicating avoidance of kites. Since avian predator populations have steadily increased in the past 30 years throughout the murrelet's breeding range, these avoidance effects could create a negative bias in long-term shoreline count trends. Our findings highlight the importance of considering non-lethal predator effects on murrelets when conducting at-sea censuses and constructing conservation plans.","PeriodicalId":23845,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We tested the influence of on-shore avian predators on the at-sea distribution and abundance of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) during their breeding season in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a field experiment using deterrent predator decoy kites that mimicked flying bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). In the summers of 2018 and 2019, we conducted at-sea surveys of murrelet distributions along inshore and offshore transects with and without kites flying, and tallied real eagles along the shoreline and fish schools encountered. Kites negatively influenced overall murrelet counts (estimate = −1.19, 95% CI = −1.88 to −0.51), but we did not detect inshore to offshore movements within the study site. Our results indicate murrelet movement out of the study area in response to the kites. Overall murrelet counts were also lower when real eagle counts were higher (estimate = −0.22, 95% CI = −0.35 to −0.09). When kites were flying, a higher proportion of the murrelets remaining along inshore transects were found between rather than adjacent to kite locations (estimate = −1.61, 95% CI = −2.67 to −0.54), indicating avoidance of kites. Since avian predator populations have steadily increased in the past 30 years throughout the murrelet's breeding range, these avoidance effects could create a negative bias in long-term shoreline count trends. Our findings highlight the importance of considering non-lethal predator effects on murrelets when conducting at-sea censuses and constructing conservation plans.

Abstract Image

对濒危海鸟的考虑:海岸线鸟类捕食者对海上大理石斑海噪鸥的影响
我们测试了在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省海达瓜伊(Haida Gwaii)的繁殖季节,岸上鸟类捕食者对大理石斑海雀(Brachyramphus marmoratus)海上分布和数量的影响。我们使用模仿飞行的秃鹰(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)的威慑性捕食诱饵风筝进行了一项野外实验。在 2018 年和 2019 年夏季,我们沿着放飞和不放飞风筝的近岸和离岸横断面对小椋鸟的分布进行了海上调查,并统计了沿海岸线的真鹰和遇到的鱼群。风筝会对小红 murrelet 的总体数量产生负面影响(估计值 = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.88 to -0.51),但我们并没有在研究地点内发现小红 murrelet 从近海向远海的移动。我们的结果表明,小红嘴鸻在风筝的影响下离开了研究区域。当真正的老鹰数量较多时,小红 murrelet 的总体数量也较低(估计值 = -0.22,95% CI = -0.35 至 -0.09)。当风筝飞舞时,沿岸横断面上的小红 murrelet 在风筝位置之间而不是相邻位置停留的比例较高(估计值 = -1.61, 95% CI = -2.67 to -0.54),这表明小红 murrelet 会躲避风筝。由于鸟类捕食者的数量在过去 30 年中在整个小红嘴雉的繁殖地稳步增加,这些回避效应可能会对长期海岸线计数趋势造成负面偏差。我们的研究结果突出表明,在进行海上普查和制定保护计划时,考虑捕食者对红嘴琵鹭的非致命性影响非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Society Bulletin BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Wildlife Society Bulletin is a journal for wildlife practitioners that effectively integrates cutting edge science with management and conservation, and also covers important policy issues, particularly those that focus on the integration of science and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin includes articles on contemporary wildlife management and conservation, education, administration, law enforcement, and review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. This includes: Reports on practices designed to achieve wildlife management or conservation goals. Presentation of new techniques or evaluation of techniques for studying or managing wildlife. Retrospective analyses of wildlife management and conservation programs, including the reasons for success or failure. Analyses or reports of wildlife policies, regulations, education, administration, law enforcement. Review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. as well as other pertinent topics that are deemed more appropriate for the Wildlife Society Bulletin than for The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews that focus on applied research, policy or wildlife management and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信