{"title":"Considerations for a threatened seabird: The impact of shoreline avian predators on at-sea marbled murrelets","authors":"Sonya A. Pastran, David B. Lank","doi":"10.1002/wsb.1514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We tested the influence of on-shore avian predators on the at-sea distribution and abundance of marbled murrelets (<i>Brachyramphus marmoratus</i>) during their breeding season in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a field experiment using deterrent predator decoy kites that mimicked flying bald eagles (<i>Haliaeetus leucocephalus</i>). In the summers of 2018 and 2019, we conducted at-sea surveys of murrelet distributions along inshore and offshore transects with and without kites flying, and tallied real eagles along the shoreline and fish schools encountered. Kites negatively influenced overall murrelet counts (estimate = −1.19, 95% CI = −1.88 to −0.51), but we did not detect inshore to offshore movements within the study site. Our results indicate murrelet movement out of the study area in response to the kites. Overall murrelet counts were also lower when real eagle counts were higher (estimate = −0.22, 95% CI = −0.35 to −0.09). When kites were flying, a higher proportion of the murrelets remaining along inshore transects were found between rather than adjacent to kite locations (estimate = −1.61, 95% CI = −2.67 to −0.54), indicating avoidance of kites. Since avian predator populations have steadily increased in the past 30 years throughout the murrelet's breeding range, these avoidance effects could create a negative bias in long-term shoreline count trends. Our findings highlight the importance of considering non-lethal predator effects on murrelets when conducting at-sea censuses and constructing conservation plans.","PeriodicalId":23845,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We tested the influence of on-shore avian predators on the at-sea distribution and abundance of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) during their breeding season in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. We conducted a field experiment using deterrent predator decoy kites that mimicked flying bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). In the summers of 2018 and 2019, we conducted at-sea surveys of murrelet distributions along inshore and offshore transects with and without kites flying, and tallied real eagles along the shoreline and fish schools encountered. Kites negatively influenced overall murrelet counts (estimate = −1.19, 95% CI = −1.88 to −0.51), but we did not detect inshore to offshore movements within the study site. Our results indicate murrelet movement out of the study area in response to the kites. Overall murrelet counts were also lower when real eagle counts were higher (estimate = −0.22, 95% CI = −0.35 to −0.09). When kites were flying, a higher proportion of the murrelets remaining along inshore transects were found between rather than adjacent to kite locations (estimate = −1.61, 95% CI = −2.67 to −0.54), indicating avoidance of kites. Since avian predator populations have steadily increased in the past 30 years throughout the murrelet's breeding range, these avoidance effects could create a negative bias in long-term shoreline count trends. Our findings highlight the importance of considering non-lethal predator effects on murrelets when conducting at-sea censuses and constructing conservation plans.
期刊介绍:
The Wildlife Society Bulletin is a journal for wildlife practitioners that effectively integrates cutting edge science with management and conservation, and also covers important policy issues, particularly those that focus on the integration of science and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin includes articles on contemporary wildlife management and conservation, education, administration, law enforcement, and review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. This includes:
Reports on practices designed to achieve wildlife management or conservation goals.
Presentation of new techniques or evaluation of techniques for studying or managing wildlife.
Retrospective analyses of wildlife management and conservation programs, including the reasons for success or failure.
Analyses or reports of wildlife policies, regulations, education, administration, law enforcement.
Review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. as well as other pertinent topics that are deemed more appropriate for the Wildlife Society Bulletin than for The Journal of Wildlife Management.
Book reviews that focus on applied research, policy or wildlife management and conservation.