Attitudes and knowledge about weight management among primary care physicians in Israel: a cross-sectional study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Keren Or Unger Freinkel, Ilan Yehoshua, Bar Cohen, Roni Peleg, Limor Adler
{"title":"Attitudes and knowledge about weight management among primary care physicians in Israel: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Keren Or Unger Freinkel, Ilan Yehoshua, Bar Cohen, Roni Peleg, Limor Adler","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02324-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of obesity has been increasing worldwide and is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Weight management can reduce the risk of complications and improve the quality of life of patients with obesity. This study explored primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) attitudes and knowledge about weight management. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 400 PCPs between 2020 and 2021. The survey included questions on treatment approaches (pharmaceutical and surgical) and items regarding the respondents’ demographic characteristics. We compared PCPs with low or high proactivity toward weight management. We explored attitudes and knowledge with the chi-square test for categorical variables or the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A total of 145 PCPs answered our survey (a response rate of 36.25%). More than half (53.8%) of the respondents showed low proactivity toward weight management in their practice. Proactive respondents were more likely to believe that pharmaceutical treatment effectively reduces weight and offered medical and surgical treatment options more frequently to their patients. Lack of knowledge was the most predominant reason for PCPs avoiding offering treatment to their patients, especially in less proactive PCPs (33.3% vs. 5.3%, p-value < 0.001). When comparing different pharmaceutical options, 46.6% of PCPs report they tend to prescribe liraglutide to their patients compared with only 11% who prescribe orlistat and 10.3% who prescribe phentermine (p-value < 0.001). Many PCPs still do not actively provide obesity treatment despite improved awareness and therapeutic options. PCPs’ proactivity and attitudes are vital to this effort.","PeriodicalId":9019,"journal":{"name":"BMC Family Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02324-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity has been increasing worldwide and is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Weight management can reduce the risk of complications and improve the quality of life of patients with obesity. This study explored primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) attitudes and knowledge about weight management. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 400 PCPs between 2020 and 2021. The survey included questions on treatment approaches (pharmaceutical and surgical) and items regarding the respondents’ demographic characteristics. We compared PCPs with low or high proactivity toward weight management. We explored attitudes and knowledge with the chi-square test for categorical variables or the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A total of 145 PCPs answered our survey (a response rate of 36.25%). More than half (53.8%) of the respondents showed low proactivity toward weight management in their practice. Proactive respondents were more likely to believe that pharmaceutical treatment effectively reduces weight and offered medical and surgical treatment options more frequently to their patients. Lack of knowledge was the most predominant reason for PCPs avoiding offering treatment to their patients, especially in less proactive PCPs (33.3% vs. 5.3%, p-value < 0.001). When comparing different pharmaceutical options, 46.6% of PCPs report they tend to prescribe liraglutide to their patients compared with only 11% who prescribe orlistat and 10.3% who prescribe phentermine (p-value < 0.001). Many PCPs still do not actively provide obesity treatment despite improved awareness and therapeutic options. PCPs’ proactivity and attitudes are vital to this effort.
以色列初级保健医生对体重管理的态度和知识:一项横断面研究
肥胖症的发病率在全球范围内不断上升,并与发病和死亡风险的增加有关。体重管理可以降低并发症风险,改善肥胖症患者的生活质量。本研究探讨了初级保健医生(PCPs)对体重管理的态度和相关知识。我们在 2020 年至 2021 年期间向 400 名初级保健医生发放了匿名问卷。调查内容包括有关治疗方法(药物和手术)的问题以及有关受访者人口统计学特征的项目。我们对体重管理积极性较低或较高的初级保健医生进行了比较。对于分类变量,我们采用卡方检验(chi-square test)对态度和知识进行探讨;对于连续变量,我们采用曼-惠特尼检验(Mann-Whitney test)对态度和知识进行探讨。共有 145 名初级保健医生回答了我们的调查(回复率为 36.25%)。半数以上(53.8%)的受访者在工作中对体重管理的积极性不高。积极的受访者更倾向于认为药物治疗能有效减轻体重,并更多地向患者提供药物和手术治疗方案。缺乏知识是初级保健医生避免向患者提供治疗的最主要原因,尤其是在不太积极主动的初级保健医生中(33.3% 对 5.3%,P 值小于 0.001)。在比较不同的药物选择时,46.6% 的初级保健医生表示他们倾向于为患者开立拉鲁肽处方,而只有 11% 的初级保健医生开立奥利司他处方,10.3% 的初级保健医生开立芬特明处方(P 值 < 0.001)。尽管人们对肥胖症的认识和治疗方案有所提高,但许多初级保健医生仍不积极提供肥胖症治疗。初级保健医生的积极性和态度对这项工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Family Practice
BMC Family Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Family Practice is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of primary health care research. The journal has a special focus on clinical decision making and management, continuing professional education, service utilization, needs and demand, and the organization and delivery of primary care and care in the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信