Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Partial Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Patryk Eisler, Stephan Zimmermann, Ragnar Henningsson
{"title":"Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Partial Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial","authors":"Patryk Eisler, Stephan Zimmermann, Ragnar Henningsson","doi":"10.1155/2024/9989997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. Patients undergoing breast surgery are at risk of severe postoperative pain. Several opioid-sparing strategies exist to alleviate this condition. Regional anesthesia has long been a part of perioperative pain management for these patients. <i>Aim</i>. This randomized study examined the benefits of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block (IPP/PSP), also known as pectoralis nerve plain block, compared with advanced local anesthetic infiltration. <i>Methods</i>. We analyzed 57 patients undergoing partial mastectomy with sentinel node dissection. They received either an ultrasound-guided IPP/PSP block performed preoperatively by an anesthetist or local anesthetic infiltration performed by the surgeon before and during the surgery. <i>Results</i>. Pain measured with the numerical rating scale (NRS) indicated no statistically significant difference between the groups (IPP/PSP 1.67 vs. infiltration 1.97; <svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g></svg> value 0.578). Intraoperative use of fentanyl was significantly lower in the IPP/PSP group (0.18 mg vs 0.21 mg; <svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-113\"></use></g></svg> value 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of stay in the PACU (166 min vs 175 min; <svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-113\"></use></g></svg> value 0.51). There were no differences in reported postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the groups. The difference in postoperative use of oxycodone in the PACU (<svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-113\"></use></g></svg> value 0.7) and the use of oxycodone within 24 hours postoperatively (<svg height=\"10.2124pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-3.42943pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124\" width=\"7.83752pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-113\"></use></g></svg> value 0.87) was not statistically significant. <i>Conclusions</i>. Our study showed decreased intraoperative opioid use in the IPP/PSP group and no difference in postoperative pain scores up to 24 hours. Both groups reported low postoperative pain scores. This trial is registered with NCT04824599.","PeriodicalId":501829,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research and Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9989997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Patients undergoing breast surgery are at risk of severe postoperative pain. Several opioid-sparing strategies exist to alleviate this condition. Regional anesthesia has long been a part of perioperative pain management for these patients. Aim. This randomized study examined the benefits of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block (IPP/PSP), also known as pectoralis nerve plain block, compared with advanced local anesthetic infiltration. Methods. We analyzed 57 patients undergoing partial mastectomy with sentinel node dissection. They received either an ultrasound-guided IPP/PSP block performed preoperatively by an anesthetist or local anesthetic infiltration performed by the surgeon before and during the surgery. Results. Pain measured with the numerical rating scale (NRS) indicated no statistically significant difference between the groups (IPP/PSP 1.67 vs. infiltration 1.97; value 0.578). Intraoperative use of fentanyl was significantly lower in the IPP/PSP group (0.18 mg vs 0.21 mg; value 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of stay in the PACU (166 min vs 175 min; value 0.51). There were no differences in reported postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the groups. The difference in postoperative use of oxycodone in the PACU ( value 0.7) and the use of oxycodone within 24 hours postoperatively ( value 0.87) was not statistically significant. Conclusions. Our study showed decreased intraoperative opioid use in the IPP/PSP group and no difference in postoperative pain scores up to 24 hours. Both groups reported low postoperative pain scores. This trial is registered with NCT04824599.
乳房部分切除术中的胸骨间和胸肌平面阻滞与局部麻醉浸润:前瞻性随机试验
背景。接受乳腺手术的患者有可能出现严重的术后疼痛。有几种阿片类药物节省策略可以缓解这种情况。区域麻醉长期以来一直是这些患者围手术期疼痛治疗的一部分。研究目的这项随机研究考察了胸肌间和栉状肌平面阻滞(IPP/PSP)(也称胸神经平块)与高级局麻药浸润相比的益处。方法。我们分析了 57 名接受乳房部分切除术和前哨节点切除术的患者。他们在术前接受了由麻醉师在超声引导下进行的 IPP/PSP 阻滞,或由外科医生在手术前和手术中进行的局麻药浸润。结果用数字评分量表(NRS)测量的疼痛感显示,两组之间没有显著的统计学差异(IPP/PSP 1.67 vs. 浸润 1.97;数值 0.578)。IPP/PSP 组的术中芬太尼用量明显较低(0.18 毫克 vs 0.21 毫克;数值 0.041)。在 PACU 的住院时间差异无统计学意义(166 分钟 vs 175 分钟;数值 0.51)。两组在术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)方面没有差异。术后在 PACU 使用羟考酮(值 0.7)和术后 24 小时内使用羟考酮(值 0.87)的差异无统计学意义。结论。我们的研究表明,IPP/PSP 组术中阿片类药物用量减少,术后 24 小时内疼痛评分无差异。两组术后疼痛评分均较低。该试验已在 NCT04824599 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信