From Allston to Ahmedabad: American hegemony in management education reexamined

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Keshav Krishnamurty
{"title":"From Allston to Ahmedabad: American hegemony in management education reexamined","authors":"Keshav Krishnamurty","doi":"10.1108/jmh-04-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to study the origin story of Harvard Business School’s involvement with the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad to study the reasons for the spread of American management education. It introduces both the explicit influence of Cold War politics and Indian development imaginaries to the export of American management thought in the early 1960s.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper relies on archival research for its primary source material, drawing upon rich archives of documents found at the Baker Library of Harvard Business School.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Harvard’s role in Ahmedabad was explicitly influenced by the Cold War anti-communist foreign policy of the USA, but did so opportunistically and contrary to the Ford Foundation’s (FF) original plans. Vikram Sarabhai, who was a key player in the Indian national imaginary of development, invited Harvard on his own initiative and forced the foundation to follow his interests rather than being a mere “subaltern.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This paper could additionally add to the historical debate about the scope and periodization of the Cold War and the role of non-state actors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper covers new ground in exploring the early connection between the Indian development imaginary and business education. It concludes that the export of hegemonic US management education was not successful during Cold War, and the FF was not as dominant as it was made out to be.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-04-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to study the origin story of Harvard Business School’s involvement with the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad to study the reasons for the spread of American management education. It introduces both the explicit influence of Cold War politics and Indian development imaginaries to the export of American management thought in the early 1960s.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper relies on archival research for its primary source material, drawing upon rich archives of documents found at the Baker Library of Harvard Business School.

Findings

Harvard’s role in Ahmedabad was explicitly influenced by the Cold War anti-communist foreign policy of the USA, but did so opportunistically and contrary to the Ford Foundation’s (FF) original plans. Vikram Sarabhai, who was a key player in the Indian national imaginary of development, invited Harvard on his own initiative and forced the foundation to follow his interests rather than being a mere “subaltern.”

Research limitations/implications

This paper could additionally add to the historical debate about the scope and periodization of the Cold War and the role of non-state actors.

Originality/value

This paper covers new ground in exploring the early connection between the Indian development imaginary and business education. It concludes that the export of hegemonic US management education was not successful during Cold War, and the FF was not as dominant as it was made out to be.

从阿尔斯顿到艾哈迈达巴德:重新审视美国在管理教育中的霸权地位
本文旨在研究哈佛商学院与印度艾哈迈达巴德管理学院合作的起源故事,以探讨美国管理教育传播的原因。研究结果哈佛商学院在艾哈迈达巴德的角色明显受到了美国冷战时期反共外交政策的影响,但这只是一种机会主义行为,与福特基金会(FF)最初的计划背道而驰。维克拉姆-萨拉拜(Vikram Sarabhai)是印度国家发展想象中的关键人物,他主动邀请哈佛大学,并迫使基金会遵循他的利益,而不仅仅是一个 "次等人"。"研究局限性/意义本文可为有关冷战的范围和时期以及非国家行为者的作用的历史辩论增添新的内容。它的结论是,在冷战期间,美国霸权主义管理教育的输出并不成功,FF 并不像人们想象的那样占据主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信