Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy in low-risk elderly males with breast cancer

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kim Vo, Colton Ladbury, Stephanie Yoon, Jose Bazan, Scott Glaser, Arya Amini
{"title":"Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy in low-risk elderly males with breast cancer","authors":"Kim Vo, Colton Ladbury, Stephanie Yoon, Jose Bazan, Scott Glaser, Arya Amini","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01560-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Randomized clinical trials demonstrate that lumpectomy + hormone therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) yields equivalent survival and acceptable local–regional outcomes in elderly women with early-stage, node-negative, hormone-receptor positive (HR +) breast cancer. Whether these data apply to men with the same inclusion criteria remains unknown.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The National Cancer Database was queried for male patients ≥ 65 years with pathologic T1-2N0 (≤ 3 cm) HR + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery with negative margins from 2004 to 2019. Adjuvant treatment was classified as HT alone, RT alone, or HT + RT. Male patients were matched with female patients for OS comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and Kaplan − Meier method. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 523 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 24.4% receiving HT, 16.3% receiving RT, and 59.2% receiving HT + RT. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR: 5.0–9.4 years). IPTW-adjusted 5-yr OS rates in the HT, RT, and HT + RT cohorts were 84.0% (95% CI 77.1–91.5%), 81.1% (95% CI 71.1–92.5%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.0–96.2%), respectively. On IPTW-adjusted MVA, relative to HT, receipt of HT + RT was associated with improvements in OS (HR: 0.641; <i>p</i> = 0.042). RT alone was not associated with improved OS (HR: 1.264; <i>p</i> = 0.420).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Among men ≥ 65 years old with T1-2N0 HR + breast cancer, RT alone did not confer an OS benefit over HT alone. Combination of RT + HT demonstrated significant improvements in OS. De-escalation of treatment through omission of either RT or HT at this point should be done with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01560-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Randomized clinical trials demonstrate that lumpectomy + hormone therapy (HT) without radiation therapy (RT) yields equivalent survival and acceptable local–regional outcomes in elderly women with early-stage, node-negative, hormone-receptor positive (HR +) breast cancer. Whether these data apply to men with the same inclusion criteria remains unknown.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for male patients ≥ 65 years with pathologic T1-2N0 (≤ 3 cm) HR + breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery with negative margins from 2004 to 2019. Adjuvant treatment was classified as HT alone, RT alone, or HT + RT. Male patients were matched with female patients for OS comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression and Kaplan − Meier method. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding.

Results

A total of 523 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 24.4% receiving HT, 16.3% receiving RT, and 59.2% receiving HT + RT. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (IQR: 5.0–9.4 years). IPTW-adjusted 5-yr OS rates in the HT, RT, and HT + RT cohorts were 84.0% (95% CI 77.1–91.5%), 81.1% (95% CI 71.1–92.5%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.0–96.2%), respectively. On IPTW-adjusted MVA, relative to HT, receipt of HT + RT was associated with improvements in OS (HR: 0.641; p = 0.042). RT alone was not associated with improved OS (HR: 1.264; p = 0.420).

Conclusion

Among men ≥ 65 years old with T1-2N0 HR + breast cancer, RT alone did not confer an OS benefit over HT alone. Combination of RT + HT demonstrated significant improvements in OS. De-escalation of treatment through omission of either RT or HT at this point should be done with caution.

Abstract Image

低风险老年男性乳腺癌患者放弃辅助放射治疗
目的随机临床试验表明,对于患有早期、结节阴性、激素受体阳性(HR +)乳腺癌的老年妇女,肿块切除+激素治疗(HT)而不进行放射治疗(RT)可获得同等的生存率和可接受的局部区域疗效。这些数据是否适用于具有相同纳入标准的男性患者仍是未知数。方法查询了美国国家癌症数据库(National Cancer Database),以了解 2004 年至 2019 年期间病理 T1-2N0(≤ 3 厘米)HR + 乳腺癌并接受保乳手术治疗且边缘阴性的≥ 65 岁男性患者的情况。辅助治疗分为单纯热疗、单纯热疗或热疗+热疗。男性患者与女性患者进行配对,以进行OS比较。采用 Cox 回归和 Kaplan - Meier 法进行生存分析。结果 共有523名患者符合纳入标准,其中24.4%接受HT治疗,16.3%接受RT治疗,59.2%接受HT+RT治疗。中位随访时间为 6.9 年(IQR:5.0-9.4 年)。经IPTW调整后,HT、RT和HT + RT队列的5年OS率分别为84.0%(95% CI 77.1-91.5%)、81.1%(95% CI 71.1-92.5%)和93.0%(95% CI 90.0-96.2%)。根据IPTW调整后的MVA,相对于HT,接受HT+RT与OS的改善相关(HR:0.641;P = 0.042)。结论在≥65岁的T1-2N0 HR +乳腺癌男性患者中,单独接受RT治疗并不比单独接受HT治疗更能改善OS。RT+HT联合治疗可显著改善患者的生存期。此时应慎重通过放弃 RT 或 HT 来降低治疗等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信