Discontinuation of long-term GH treatment in adults with GH deficiency: a survey of UK practice

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sherwin Criseno, Helena Gleeson, Andrew A Toogood, Neil J Gittoes, Annie Topping, Niki Karavitaki
{"title":"Discontinuation of long-term GH treatment in adults with GH deficiency: a survey of UK practice","authors":"Sherwin Criseno, Helena Gleeson, Andrew A Toogood, Neil J Gittoes, Annie Topping, Niki Karavitaki","doi":"10.1530/ec-23-0533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective: We conducted a survey of UK endocrine clinicians between 06/2022 and 08/2022 to understand current practices regarding GH treatment discontinuation in adults with GH deficiency (GHD). </p>\n<p>Design and Methods: Using Survey Monkey®, a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire was disseminated to the UK Society for Endocrinology membership. It consisted of 15 questions on demographics, number of patients receiving GH and current practice on GH treatment discontinuation. </p>\n<p>Results: 102 endocrine clinicians completed the survey; 65 respondents (33 endocrinologists and 32 specialist nurses) indicated active involvement in managing patients with GHD. 27.7% of clinicians were routinely offering a trial of GH discontinuation to adults receiving long-term GH therapy. Only 6% had a clinical guideline to direct such practice. 29.2% stated that GH discontinuation should be routinely offered as an option to patients on long-term treatment; 60% were not clearly in favour or against this approach but stated that it should probably be considered, whilst 9.2% were against. During the GH withdrawal period, most clinicians monitor signs/symptoms (75.4%), measure IGF-1 (84.6%) and complete a quality of life assessment (89.2%). </p>\n<p>Conclusions: The practice of offering a trial of GH discontinuation in GHD adults on long-term GH therapy is highly variable reflecting the lack of high quality evidence. Around a quarter of clinicians offer GH withdrawal for a number of reasons, but only a few have a local clinical guidance. A further 60% of clinicians stated they would probably consider such an approach. Methodologically sound studies underpinning the development of safe and cost-effective guidance are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11634,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Connections","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Connections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ec-23-0533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a survey of UK endocrine clinicians between 06/2022 and 08/2022 to understand current practices regarding GH treatment discontinuation in adults with GH deficiency (GHD).

Design and Methods: Using Survey Monkey®, a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire was disseminated to the UK Society for Endocrinology membership. It consisted of 15 questions on demographics, number of patients receiving GH and current practice on GH treatment discontinuation.

Results: 102 endocrine clinicians completed the survey; 65 respondents (33 endocrinologists and 32 specialist nurses) indicated active involvement in managing patients with GHD. 27.7% of clinicians were routinely offering a trial of GH discontinuation to adults receiving long-term GH therapy. Only 6% had a clinical guideline to direct such practice. 29.2% stated that GH discontinuation should be routinely offered as an option to patients on long-term treatment; 60% were not clearly in favour or against this approach but stated that it should probably be considered, whilst 9.2% were against. During the GH withdrawal period, most clinicians monitor signs/symptoms (75.4%), measure IGF-1 (84.6%) and complete a quality of life assessment (89.2%).

Conclusions: The practice of offering a trial of GH discontinuation in GHD adults on long-term GH therapy is highly variable reflecting the lack of high quality evidence. Around a quarter of clinicians offer GH withdrawal for a number of reasons, but only a few have a local clinical guidance. A further 60% of clinicians stated they would probably consider such an approach. Methodologically sound studies underpinning the development of safe and cost-effective guidance are needed.

成人 GH 缺乏症患者停止长期 GH 治疗:英国实践调查
目的:我们在 2022 年 6 月至 2022 年 8 月期间对英国的内分泌临床医生进行了一项调查,以了解目前对 GH 缺乏症(GHD)成人停止 GH 治疗的做法。设计与方法:使用 Survey Monkey® 向英国内分泌学会会员分发了一份基于网络的多项选择问卷。该问卷包括 15 个问题,涉及人口统计学、接受 GH 治疗的患者人数以及当前停止 GH 治疗的做法。结果:102名内分泌临床医生完成了调查;65名受访者(33名内分泌科医生和32名专科护士)表示积极参与管理GHD患者。27.7%的临床医生例行为长期接受GH治疗的成人提供GH停药试验。只有 6% 的临床医生有指导这种做法的临床指南。29.2%的临床医生表示,应将停用 GH 作为长期接受治疗的患者的一项常规选择;60%的临床医生没有明确表示赞成或反对这种方法,但表示可能应考虑停用 GH,而 9.2%的临床医生表示反对。在停用 GH 期间,大多数临床医生会监测体征/症状(75.4%)、测量 IGF-1(84.6%)并完成生活质量评估(89.2%)。结论由于缺乏高质量的证据,为长期接受 GH 治疗的 GHD 成人提供 GH 中止试验的做法存在很大差异。约有四分之一的临床医生出于多种原因停用 GH,但只有少数医生制定了当地临床指南。另有 60% 的临床医生表示他们可能会考虑这种方法。在制定安全且具有成本效益的指导意见时,需要进行方法可靠的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Connections
Endocrine Connections Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Connections publishes original quality research and reviews in all areas of endocrinology, including papers that deal with non-classical tissues as source or targets of hormones and endocrine papers that have relevance to endocrine-related and intersecting disciplines and the wider biomedical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信