The Association of Advanced Care Planning and Good Death in Palliative Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Thailand

Songphol Tungjitviboonkun
{"title":"The Association of Advanced Care Planning and Good Death in Palliative Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Thailand","authors":"Songphol Tungjitviboonkun","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.18.24304500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The goal of treatment for elderly AML patients is palliative care rather than curative chemotherapy. Advanced care planning (ACP) plays a crucial role in good death. However, the factors associated with ACP and good death have not been well described.\nObjective: This study aimed to characterize the association between advanced care planning and the outcome of good death in elderly AML patients.\nMethod: AML patients aged ≥60, who received less intensive treatment from August 2020 to December 2021, were interviewed and prospectively followed. All clinical data and potential factors related to ACP and good death were collected.\nResults: Seventeen AML patients were included during the study period. The median age was 73 years (range 63-88). Twenty-five patients had passed away, with a median survival of 5.5 months. Thirteen patients had undergone ACP. Among them, twelve patients with ACP had passed away, and all had achieved good death, while six out of fifteen in the non-ACP group had achieved good death (p=0.003). Two-thirds of the ACP group initially expected to live for a year when undergoing ACP but later revised their expectations downward. In the non-ACP group, only two patients who achieved a good death were aware that AML would be the cause of death, whereas five out of six in the non-good death group were not aware of it. However, it was found that prognosis understanding alone did not correlate with successful end-of-life care. No other significant factors associated with patient outcomes were identified. Factors associated with the initiation of ACP discussions included decreased platelet count and increased blast count from baseline. Palliative performance status was not predictive when assessed too late. The median time from palliative consultation to death was 3.5 months, which appeared sufficient for patient preparation.\nConclusion: The key factor associated with good death was the initiation of ACP discussions with the patient. Decreased platelet count and increased blast count from baseline could serve as warning signs.","PeriodicalId":501203,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Hematology","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.18.24304500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal of treatment for elderly AML patients is palliative care rather than curative chemotherapy. Advanced care planning (ACP) plays a crucial role in good death. However, the factors associated with ACP and good death have not been well described. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the association between advanced care planning and the outcome of good death in elderly AML patients. Method: AML patients aged ≥60, who received less intensive treatment from August 2020 to December 2021, were interviewed and prospectively followed. All clinical data and potential factors related to ACP and good death were collected. Results: Seventeen AML patients were included during the study period. The median age was 73 years (range 63-88). Twenty-five patients had passed away, with a median survival of 5.5 months. Thirteen patients had undergone ACP. Among them, twelve patients with ACP had passed away, and all had achieved good death, while six out of fifteen in the non-ACP group had achieved good death (p=0.003). Two-thirds of the ACP group initially expected to live for a year when undergoing ACP but later revised their expectations downward. In the non-ACP group, only two patients who achieved a good death were aware that AML would be the cause of death, whereas five out of six in the non-good death group were not aware of it. However, it was found that prognosis understanding alone did not correlate with successful end-of-life care. No other significant factors associated with patient outcomes were identified. Factors associated with the initiation of ACP discussions included decreased platelet count and increased blast count from baseline. Palliative performance status was not predictive when assessed too late. The median time from palliative consultation to death was 3.5 months, which appeared sufficient for patient preparation. Conclusion: The key factor associated with good death was the initiation of ACP discussions with the patient. Decreased platelet count and increased blast count from baseline could serve as warning signs.
泰国老年急性髓性白血病姑息治疗患者的晚期护理规划与良好死亡之间的关系
背景:老年急性髓细胞白血病患者的治疗目标是姑息治疗,而非治愈性化疗。晚期护理计划(ACP)在良好死亡中起着至关重要的作用。然而,与 ACP 和良好死亡相关的因素尚未得到很好的描述:本研究旨在描述老年 AML 患者的晚期护理计划与良好死亡结果之间的关系:方法:对 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受强化治疗的年龄≥60 岁的急性髓细胞白血病患者进行访谈和前瞻性随访。收集所有临床数据以及与ACP和良好死亡相关的潜在因素:研究期间共纳入 17 名急性髓细胞白血病患者。中位年龄为 73 岁(63-88 岁不等)。25名患者已经去世,中位生存期为5.5个月。13名患者接受了ACP治疗。其中,12 名接受 ACP 的患者已经去世,并且全部实现了良好死亡,而 15 名未接受 ACP 的患者中有 6 人实现了良好死亡(P=0.003)。ACP组中有三分之二的患者在接受ACP治疗时最初预计能活一年,但后来将预期下调。在非 ACP 组中,只有两名获得良好死亡的患者知道急性髓细胞性白血病将是死亡原因,而在非良好死亡组中,六名患者中有五名不知道这一点。然而,研究发现,仅仅了解预后与成功的临终关怀并不相关。没有发现与患者预后相关的其他重要因素。与启动 ACP 讨论相关的因素包括血小板计数较基线下降和血细胞计数较基线上升。如果评估太晚,姑息治疗表现状态则不具有预测性。从姑息咨询到死亡的中位时间为3.5个月,这似乎足以让患者做好准备:结论:与良好死亡相关的关键因素是与患者开始讨论姑息治疗方案。血小板计数减少和血细胞计数较基线增加可作为预警信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信