Óscar Álvarez-Machancoses, Eshel Faraggi, Enrique deAndrés-Galiana, Juan Fernández-Martínez, Andrzej Kloczkowski
{"title":"Prediction of Deleterious Single Amino Acid Polymorphisms with a Consensus Holdout Sampler","authors":"Óscar Álvarez-Machancoses, Eshel Faraggi, Enrique deAndrés-Galiana, Juan Fernández-Martínez, Andrzej Kloczkowski","doi":"10.2174/0113892029236347240308054538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Single Amino Acid Polymorphisms (SAPs) or nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants (nsSNVs) are the most common genetic variations. They result from missense mutations where a single base pair substitution changes the genetic code in such a way that the triplet of bases (codon) at a given position is coding a different amino acid. Since genetic mutations sometimes cause genetic diseases, it is important to comprehend and foresee which variations are harmful and which ones are neutral (not causing changes in the phenotype). This can be posed as a classification problem. Methods: Computational methods using machine intelligence are gradually replacing repetitive and exceedingly overpriced mutagenic tests. By and large, uneven quality, deficiencies, and irregularities of nsSNVs datasets debase the convenience of artificial intelligence-based methods. Subsequently, strong and more exact approaches are needed to address these problems. In the present work paper, we show a consensus classifier built on the holdout sampler, which appears strong and precise and outflanks all other popular methods. objective: Roughly a half of known disease-related mutations are due to non-synonymous variants [8-9], expressed as amino-acid mutations. Therefore, it is important to unravel the links between nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants and associated diseases to discriminate between pathogenic and neutral substitutions. It has been found that these substitutions could be directly related to pathological effects such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s diseases, or to the involvement in complex diseases, such as cancer development. Results: We produced 100 holdouts to test the structures and diverse classification variables of diverse classifiers during the training phase. The finest performing holdouts were chosen to develop a consensus classifier and tested using a k-fold (1 ≤ k ≤5) cross-validation method. We also examined which protein properties have the biggest impact on the precise prediction of the effects of nsSNVs. Conclusion: Our Consensus Holdout Sampler outflanks other popular algorithms, and gives excellent results, highly accurate with low standard deviation. The advantage of our method emerges from using a tree of holdouts, where diverse LM/AI-based programs are sampled in diverse ways.","PeriodicalId":10803,"journal":{"name":"Current Genomics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892029236347240308054538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Single Amino Acid Polymorphisms (SAPs) or nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants (nsSNVs) are the most common genetic variations. They result from missense mutations where a single base pair substitution changes the genetic code in such a way that the triplet of bases (codon) at a given position is coding a different amino acid. Since genetic mutations sometimes cause genetic diseases, it is important to comprehend and foresee which variations are harmful and which ones are neutral (not causing changes in the phenotype). This can be posed as a classification problem. Methods: Computational methods using machine intelligence are gradually replacing repetitive and exceedingly overpriced mutagenic tests. By and large, uneven quality, deficiencies, and irregularities of nsSNVs datasets debase the convenience of artificial intelligence-based methods. Subsequently, strong and more exact approaches are needed to address these problems. In the present work paper, we show a consensus classifier built on the holdout sampler, which appears strong and precise and outflanks all other popular methods. objective: Roughly a half of known disease-related mutations are due to non-synonymous variants [8-9], expressed as amino-acid mutations. Therefore, it is important to unravel the links between nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Variants and associated diseases to discriminate between pathogenic and neutral substitutions. It has been found that these substitutions could be directly related to pathological effects such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s diseases, or to the involvement in complex diseases, such as cancer development. Results: We produced 100 holdouts to test the structures and diverse classification variables of diverse classifiers during the training phase. The finest performing holdouts were chosen to develop a consensus classifier and tested using a k-fold (1 ≤ k ≤5) cross-validation method. We also examined which protein properties have the biggest impact on the precise prediction of the effects of nsSNVs. Conclusion: Our Consensus Holdout Sampler outflanks other popular algorithms, and gives excellent results, highly accurate with low standard deviation. The advantage of our method emerges from using a tree of holdouts, where diverse LM/AI-based programs are sampled in diverse ways.
期刊介绍:
Current Genomics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides essential reading about the latest and most important developments in genome science and related fields of research. Systems biology, systems modeling, machine learning, network inference, bioinformatics, computational biology, epigenetics, single cell genomics, extracellular vesicles, quantitative biology, and synthetic biology for the study of evolution, development, maintenance, aging and that of human health, human diseases, clinical genomics and precision medicine are topics of particular interest. The journal covers plant genomics. The journal will not consider articles dealing with breeding and livestock.
Current Genomics publishes three types of articles including:
i) Research papers from internationally-recognized experts reporting on new and original data generated at the genome scale level. Position papers dealing with new or challenging methodological approaches, whether experimental or mathematical, are greatly welcome in this section.
ii) Authoritative and comprehensive full-length or mini reviews from widely recognized experts, covering the latest developments in genome science and related fields of research such as systems biology, statistics and machine learning, quantitative biology, and precision medicine. Proposals for mini-hot topics (2-3 review papers) and full hot topics (6-8 review papers) guest edited by internationally-recognized experts are welcome in this section. Hot topic proposals should not contain original data and they should contain articles originating from at least 2 different countries.
iii) Opinion papers from internationally recognized experts addressing contemporary questions and issues in the field of genome science and systems biology and basic and clinical research practices.