Evaluation of Febrile Seizure Risk Following Ancestral Monovalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Among U.S. Children Aged 2-5 Years

Richard A Forshee, Elizabeth R Smith, Zhiruo Wan, Kandace L Amend, Alex Secora, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Kamran Kazemi, Jennifer Song, Lauren E Parlett, John D Seeger, Nandini Selvam, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Mao Hu, Yoganand Chillarige, Steven A Anderson
{"title":"Evaluation of Febrile Seizure Risk Following Ancestral Monovalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Among U.S. Children Aged 2-5 Years","authors":"Richard A Forshee, Elizabeth R Smith, Zhiruo Wan, Kandace L Amend, Alex Secora, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Kamran Kazemi, Jennifer Song, Lauren E Parlett, John D Seeger, Nandini Selvam, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Mao Hu, Yoganand Chillarige, Steven A Anderson","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.12.24304127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nThe United States Food and Drug Administration noted a potential safety concern for seizure in children aged 2-5 years receiving the ancestral monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.\nObjective\nTo evaluate febrile seizure risk following monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination among children aged 2-5 years. Design, Setting, and Participants\nThe primary analysis evaluated children who had a febrile seizure outcome in the 0-1 days following COVID-19 vaccination. A self-controlled case series analysis was performed in three commercial insurance databases to compare the risk of seizure in the risk interval (0-1 days) to a control interval (8-63 days).\nExposure\nReceipt of dose 1 and/or dose 2 of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations.\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nThe primary outcome was febrile seizure (0-1 day risk interval). Analysis\nA conditional Poisson regression model was used to compare outcome rates in risk and control intervals and estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analyses were used to pool results across databases.\nResults\nThe primary meta-analysis found a statistically significant increased incidence of febrile seizure, in the 0-1 days following mRNA-1273 vaccination compared to the control interval (IRR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.69, risk difference (RD)/100,000 doses = 3.22 (95%CI -0.31 to 6.75)). For the BNT162b2 vaccination, the IRR was elevated but not statistically significant (IRR: 1.41, 95%CI: 0.48 to 4.11, RD/100,000 doses = -0.25 (95%CI -2.75 to 2.24). Conclusions and Relevance\nAmong children aged 2-5 years, the analysis showed a small elevated incidence rate ratio of febrile seizures in the 0-1 days following the mRNA-1273 vaccination. Based on the current body of scientific evidence, the safety profile of the monovalent mRNA vaccines remains favorable for use in young children.","PeriodicalId":501549,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.12.24304127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The United States Food and Drug Administration noted a potential safety concern for seizure in children aged 2-5 years receiving the ancestral monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Objective To evaluate febrile seizure risk following monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination among children aged 2-5 years. Design, Setting, and Participants The primary analysis evaluated children who had a febrile seizure outcome in the 0-1 days following COVID-19 vaccination. A self-controlled case series analysis was performed in three commercial insurance databases to compare the risk of seizure in the risk interval (0-1 days) to a control interval (8-63 days). Exposure Receipt of dose 1 and/or dose 2 of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was febrile seizure (0-1 day risk interval). Analysis A conditional Poisson regression model was used to compare outcome rates in risk and control intervals and estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analyses were used to pool results across databases. Results The primary meta-analysis found a statistically significant increased incidence of febrile seizure, in the 0-1 days following mRNA-1273 vaccination compared to the control interval (IRR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.69, risk difference (RD)/100,000 doses = 3.22 (95%CI -0.31 to 6.75)). For the BNT162b2 vaccination, the IRR was elevated but not statistically significant (IRR: 1.41, 95%CI: 0.48 to 4.11, RD/100,000 doses = -0.25 (95%CI -2.75 to 2.24). Conclusions and Relevance Among children aged 2-5 years, the analysis showed a small elevated incidence rate ratio of febrile seizures in the 0-1 days following the mRNA-1273 vaccination. Based on the current body of scientific evidence, the safety profile of the monovalent mRNA vaccines remains favorable for use in young children.
美国 2-5 岁儿童接种祖传单价 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗后的热性惊厥风险评估
重要性美国食品和药物管理局指出,接种祖传单价 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗的 2-5 岁儿童可能存在癫痫发作的安全隐患。目的评估 2-5 岁儿童接种单价 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗后发热性癫痫发作的风险。主要分析评估接种 COVID-19 疫苗后 0-1 天内出现发热性癫痫发作的儿童。在三个商业保险数据库中进行了自我对照病例系列分析,以比较风险区间(0-1 天)与对照区间(8-63 天)的癫痫发作风险。主要结果和测量主要结果是发热性癫痫发作(0-1 天风险区间)。分析采用条件泊松回归模型比较风险区间和对照区间的结果发生率,并估算发病率比(IRR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果主要荟萃分析发现,与对照区间相比,接种 mRNA-1273 疫苗后 0-1 天内发热性癫痫发作的发生率有统计学意义的显著增加(IRR:2.52,95% CI:1.35 至 4.69,风险差异 (RD)/100,000 剂 = 3.22 (95%CI -0.31 至 6.75))。对于 BNT162b2 疫苗接种,IRR 升高但无统计学意义(IRR:1.41,95%CI:0.48 至 4.11,RD/100,000 剂 = -0.25 (95%CI -2.75 至 2.24))。结论和相关性分析表明,在接种 mRNA-1273 疫苗后的 0-1 天内,2-5 岁儿童发热性惊厥的发病率比略有升高。根据目前的科学证据,单价 mRNA 疫苗的安全性仍然适合幼儿使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信