The Association of Anticoagulation Intensity with Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Q3 Medicine
Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2024-03-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8838308
Rena Zheng, Alexandra Solomon, Madeline DiLorenzo, Iniya Rajendran, Joseph Park, Vrushali Dhongade, Michael A Garcia, Robert T Eberhardt, John Mark Sloan, Janice Weinberg, Elizabeth S Klings
{"title":"The Association of Anticoagulation Intensity with Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Rena Zheng, Alexandra Solomon, Madeline DiLorenzo, Iniya Rajendran, Joseph Park, Vrushali Dhongade, Michael A Garcia, Robert T Eberhardt, John Mark Sloan, Janice Weinberg, Elizabeth S Klings","doi":"10.1155/2024/8838308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is increased in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A key question was whether increased intensity of anticoagulation would help prevent VTE and improve patient outcomes, including transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. At the start of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, our institution, Boston Medical Center, instituted a VTE risk stratification protocol based on patients' initial D-dimer levels, medical history, and presence of thrombosis to determine whether they should receive standard-dose prophylaxis, high-dose prophylaxis, or therapeutic anticoagulation. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study examining the association of degree of anticoagulation with outcomes in 915 hospitalized COVID-19 patients hospitalized initially on the general inpatient wards between March 1,<sup>,</sup> 2020, and June 1, 2020. Patients directly hospitalized in the ICU were excluded. Most, 813 patients (89%), in our cohort were on standard-dose prophylaxis; 32 patients (3.5%) received high-dose prophylaxis; 70 patients (7.7%), were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. VTE occurred in 45 patients (4.9%), and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 5.4% (49 deaths). On multivariable analysis of clinical outcomes in relation to type of anticoagulation, in the high-dose prophylaxis group, there was a trend towards increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.4 (0.8-7.5, 95% CI)) and increased ICU transfer (odds ratio 2.2 (0.9-5.7, 95% CI)). Our results suggest that patients receiving high-dose prophylaxis had more severe disease that was not mitigated by intermediate-dose anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8838308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8838308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is increased in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A key question was whether increased intensity of anticoagulation would help prevent VTE and improve patient outcomes, including transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. At the start of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, our institution, Boston Medical Center, instituted a VTE risk stratification protocol based on patients' initial D-dimer levels, medical history, and presence of thrombosis to determine whether they should receive standard-dose prophylaxis, high-dose prophylaxis, or therapeutic anticoagulation. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study examining the association of degree of anticoagulation with outcomes in 915 hospitalized COVID-19 patients hospitalized initially on the general inpatient wards between March 1,, 2020, and June 1, 2020. Patients directly hospitalized in the ICU were excluded. Most, 813 patients (89%), in our cohort were on standard-dose prophylaxis; 32 patients (3.5%) received high-dose prophylaxis; 70 patients (7.7%), were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. VTE occurred in 45 patients (4.9%), and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 5.4% (49 deaths). On multivariable analysis of clinical outcomes in relation to type of anticoagulation, in the high-dose prophylaxis group, there was a trend towards increased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.4 (0.8-7.5, 95% CI)) and increased ICU transfer (odds ratio 2.2 (0.9-5.7, 95% CI)). Our results suggest that patients receiving high-dose prophylaxis had more severe disease that was not mitigated by intermediate-dose anticoagulation.

抗凝强度与 COVID-19 住院患者预后的关系。
感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。一个关键问题是,增加抗凝强度是否有助于预防 VTE 并改善患者的预后,包括转入重症监护室(ICU)和死亡率。在冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19)大流行之初,我们所在的波士顿医疗中心就根据患者的初始 D-二聚体水平、病史和血栓形成情况制定了 VTE 风险分层方案,以确定患者是应该接受标准剂量预防、高剂量预防还是治疗性抗凝。我们对 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 1 日期间最初在普通病房住院的 915 名 COVID-19 住院患者进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,探讨了抗凝程度与预后的关系。不包括直接在重症监护室住院的患者。我们的队列中有 813 名患者(89%)接受了标准剂量的预防治疗;32 名患者(3.5%)接受了高剂量预防治疗;70 名患者(7.7%)接受了治疗性抗凝治疗。45名患者(4.9%)发生了VTE,总体院内死亡率为5.4%(49人死亡)。对与抗凝类型相关的临床结果进行多变量分析后发现,在大剂量预防组中,院内死亡率呈上升趋势(几率比 2.4(0.8-7.5,95% CI)),ICU 转院率呈上升趋势(几率比 2.2(0.9-5.7,95% CI))。我们的研究结果表明,接受大剂量预防治疗的患者病情更为严重,而中剂量抗凝治疗并不能减轻病情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信