[Cost-revenue aspects of endovascular treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies with respect to the introduction of a new thoracic side-branch prosthesis].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00104-024-02072-3
Moritz S Bischoff, Denis Skrypnik, Wolfgang Fiori, Oliver Schöffski, Dittmar Böckler
{"title":"[Cost-revenue aspects of endovascular treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies with respect to the introduction of a new thoracic side-branch prosthesis].","authors":"Moritz S Bischoff, Denis Skrypnik, Wolfgang Fiori, Oliver Schöffski, Dittmar Böckler","doi":"10.1007/s00104-024-02072-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard vascular surgical procedure (SV) for the treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies involves a hybrid approach using a left carotid-subclavian bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Considering the introduction of a thoracic side branch prosthesis (TBE), the aim of this study was to analyze the cost-revenue aspects of both procedures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on cases treated by SV from 2017 to 2022. To draw conclusions regarding the use of TBE, the main diagnoses and procedures of SV were recoded based on current classifications (ICD/OPS 2023) for revenue calculations and regrouped according to aG-DRG 2023. An OPS modification and regrouping were performed for modeling TBE revenues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 cases were identified (mean age 62.5 ± 13.8 years; 10 males). After regrouping, the following DRGs were obtained: F42Z in N = 5, F51A in N = 4, F08B in N = 2, and F07A and F36B each in N = 1. The total revenue after regrouping was € 666,514.13, including an additional payment (ZE) of € 132,729.14. With the modeled application of TBE, a total revenue of € 659,212.19 was achieved. Compared to SV, this represents a revenue decrease of € 16,886.71 (changed DRG), but with an increase in ZE revenue by € 65,559.78 (different ZE). The use of TBE resulted in a saving of 74 occupancy days, including 13.5 days in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A cost coverage seems probable with a change in the procedure, despite the yet to be determined pricing of TBE. This is highly dependent on the coding quality and the future development of ZE, given the annually changing DRG relative weights. Precise and transparent performance and cost documentation are essential for determining the pricing.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11096206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02072-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The standard vascular surgical procedure (SV) for the treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies involves a hybrid approach using a left carotid-subclavian bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Considering the introduction of a thoracic side branch prosthesis (TBE), the aim of this study was to analyze the cost-revenue aspects of both procedures.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on cases treated by SV from 2017 to 2022. To draw conclusions regarding the use of TBE, the main diagnoses and procedures of SV were recoded based on current classifications (ICD/OPS 2023) for revenue calculations and regrouped according to aG-DRG 2023. An OPS modification and regrouping were performed for modeling TBE revenues.

Results: A total of 13 cases were identified (mean age 62.5 ± 13.8 years; 10 males). After regrouping, the following DRGs were obtained: F42Z in N = 5, F51A in N = 4, F08B in N = 2, and F07A and F36B each in N = 1. The total revenue after regrouping was € 666,514.13, including an additional payment (ZE) of € 132,729.14. With the modeled application of TBE, a total revenue of € 659,212.19 was achieved. Compared to SV, this represents a revenue decrease of € 16,886.71 (changed DRG), but with an increase in ZE revenue by € 65,559.78 (different ZE). The use of TBE resulted in a saving of 74 occupancy days, including 13.5 days in intensive care.

Conclusion: A cost coverage seems probable with a change in the procedure, despite the yet to be determined pricing of TBE. This is highly dependent on the coding quality and the future development of ZE, given the annually changing DRG relative weights. Precise and transparent performance and cost documentation are essential for determining the pricing.

[主动脉弓远端病变血管内治疗的成本-收入方面与新型胸腔侧支假体的引入有关]。
背景:治疗主动脉弓远端病变的标准血管外科手术(SV)包括使用左颈动脉-锁骨下旁路和胸腔内主动脉血管修补术的混合方法。考虑到胸腔侧支假体(TBE)的引入,本研究旨在分析这两种手术的成本-收入方面:对2017年至2022年由SV治疗的病例进行了回顾性分析。为了得出有关使用 TBE 的结论,根据当前的分类(ICD/OPS 2023)对 SV 的主要诊断和手术进行了重新编码,以计算收入,并根据 aG-DRG 2023 重新分组。在建立 TBE 收入模型时,对 OPS 进行了修改和重新分组:共发现 13 例病例(平均年龄 62.5 ± 13.8 岁;10 例男性)。F42Z(5 例)、F51A(4 例)、F08B(2 例)、F07A 和 F36B(各 1 例)。重新分组后的总收入为 666,514.13 欧元,包括 132,729.14 欧元的额外付款(ZE)。在模拟应用 TBE 的情况下,总收入为 659,212.19 欧元。与 SV 相比,收入减少了 16,886.71 欧元(改变了 DRG),但 ZE 收入增加了 65,559.78 欧元(不同的 ZE)。使用 TBE 可节省 74 天的住院时间,其中包括 13.5 天的重症监护时间:结论:尽管 TBE 的定价尚未确定,但改变手术方式似乎有可能降低成本。这在很大程度上取决于编码质量和 ZE 的未来发展,因为 DRG 的相对权重每年都在变化。精确、透明的绩效和成本记录对于确定定价至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信