External handheld loads affect scapular elevation and upward rotation during shoulder elevation tasks.

Q2 Medicine
International Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1080/23335432.2024.2332212
Alan Eldridge, Everett Lohman, Skulpan Asavasopon, Lida Gharibvand, Lori Michener
{"title":"External handheld loads affect scapular elevation and upward rotation during shoulder elevation tasks.","authors":"Alan Eldridge, Everett Lohman, Skulpan Asavasopon, Lida Gharibvand, Lori Michener","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2024.2332212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Altered scapular kinematics is associated with shoulder pain. Resistance exercise is a common treatment; however, the effects of lifting an external load on scapular kinematics is limited. Understanding whether an external handheld load affects scapular kinematics in a healthy population can provide normal values utilized for comparison to individuals with shoulder pain. Currently, no studies have examined the effect of incrementally increased handheld loads. We defined the effects of varying external handheld loads on scapular kinematics during a shoulder elevation task. Healthy participants (<i>n</i> = 50) elevated their shoulder in the scapular plane over 4 trials. One trial of no loading (control) and 3 trials with incrementally increased external handheld loads. Scapular kinematic rotations and translations were measured during ascent and descent phases using 3D motion capture. Compared to no load, the highest external load during ascent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.2 degrees (95%CI: 0.9, 5.4), <i>p</i> = 0.006], and during descent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.9 degrees (95%CI: 2.8, 5.1), <i>p</i> < 0.001] and increased <b>scapular upward rotation</b> [mean difference = 4.5 degrees (95%CI: 2.4, 6.6), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. External handheld loads result in small <b>increases in scapular elevation and scapular upward rotation</b>. These results should be utilized as normal values to compare to individuals with shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2024.2332212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Altered scapular kinematics is associated with shoulder pain. Resistance exercise is a common treatment; however, the effects of lifting an external load on scapular kinematics is limited. Understanding whether an external handheld load affects scapular kinematics in a healthy population can provide normal values utilized for comparison to individuals with shoulder pain. Currently, no studies have examined the effect of incrementally increased handheld loads. We defined the effects of varying external handheld loads on scapular kinematics during a shoulder elevation task. Healthy participants (n = 50) elevated their shoulder in the scapular plane over 4 trials. One trial of no loading (control) and 3 trials with incrementally increased external handheld loads. Scapular kinematic rotations and translations were measured during ascent and descent phases using 3D motion capture. Compared to no load, the highest external load during ascent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.2 degrees (95%CI: 0.9, 5.4), p = 0.006], and during descent increased scapular elevation [mean difference = 3.9 degrees (95%CI: 2.8, 5.1), p < 0.001] and increased scapular upward rotation [mean difference = 4.5 degrees (95%CI: 2.4, 6.6), p < 0.001]. External handheld loads result in small increases in scapular elevation and scapular upward rotation. These results should be utilized as normal values to compare to individuals with shoulder pain.

在肩部抬高任务中,外部手持负荷会影响肩胛骨的抬高和上旋。
肩胛骨运动学的改变与肩痛有关。抗阻力锻炼是一种常见的治疗方法;然而,举起外部负荷对肩胛骨运动学的影响却很有限。了解外部手持负重是否会影响健康人群的肩胛骨运动学,可以为肩痛患者提供用于比较的正常值。目前,还没有研究对逐渐增加的手持负荷的影响进行研究。我们确定了在肩部抬高任务中不同外部手持负荷对肩胛骨运动学的影响。健康参与者(n = 50)在肩胛平面上抬高肩膀,共进行了 4 次试验。一次试验无负荷(对照组),3 次试验外部手持负荷逐渐增加。在上升和下降阶段,使用 3D 运动捕捉测量肩胛骨运动旋转和平移。与无负荷相比,上升时的最高外部负荷增加了肩胛骨抬高[平均差异=3.2度(95%CI:0.9,5.4),p=0.006],下降时增加了肩胛骨抬高[平均差异=3.9度(95%CI:2.8,5.1),p],肩胛骨上旋[平均差异=4.5度(95%CI:2.4,6.6),p]。这些结果应作为正常值与肩痛患者进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信